Don't resign Shazier save for Tuitt

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Shoe
    Hall of Famer
    • May 2008
    • 4044

    #31
    I have a comment about the people saying we should've taken Mosely instead of Shazier. That is fallacious reasoning. Whether or not it turns out to be the right or wrong move, it was a sound decision to take the younger, faster, less beat-up guy (Mosely had a hip condition and I think a shoulder thing too). You can't be results-oriented with the draft. You just have to make the most sound decision.

    As for the Polamalu contracts, yeah he made it through his 3rd contract. That doesn't mean Shazier would. Woodley got a fat 2nd deal, and took that ("fat") literally. With an injury prone guy like Shazier, I don't think it is realistic to think he will get more durable as he gets older.
    I wasn't hired for my disposition.

    Comment

    • Captain Lemming
      Legend
      • Jun 2008
      • 16127

      #32
      Originally posted by BradshawsHairdresser
      That is an interesting question. Some of the posters on here always want to put all the blame on the players when the D doesn't perform well. But I think that the defensive changes made for the Chiefs game shows us that the scheme can also be an important factor. For whatever reason, the coaches went with a bland, no-pressure scheme the first three weeks, which led to the stinker in Philly. A more aggressive scheme definitely helped the D vs. KC.
      Actually, I don't see too great a change schematically.
      We often got pressure and sacks bringing 4, there was not suddenly a bunch of exotic blitzes.
      Heck Heyward had 3 sacks alone. He was hurt before

      Tomlin said fundamentals were the reasons for the Philly struggles.

      Just like the offense, the defense just executed better.
      Last edited by Captain Lemming; 10-07-2016, 01:59 AM.
      sigpic



      In view of the fact that Mike Tomlin has matched Cowhers record I give him the designation:

      TCFCLTC-
      The Coach Formerly Considered Less Than Cowher

      Comment

      • feltdizz
        Legend
        • May 2008
        • 27633

        #33
        How about we resign both of them? Timmons cant play forever.
        Steelers 27
        Rats 16

        Comment

        • Captain Lemming
          Legend
          • Jun 2008
          • 16127

          #34
          Originally posted by feltdizz
          How about we resign both of them? Timmons cant play forever.
          Thats the bottom line. You don't want TWO solid but slowpoke linebackers starting in a couple of years.
          sigpic



          In view of the fact that Mike Tomlin has matched Cowhers record I give him the designation:

          TCFCLTC-
          The Coach Formerly Considered Less Than Cowher

          Comment

          • Shawn
            Legend
            • Mar 2008
            • 15131

            #35
            Originally posted by Shoe
            I have a comment about the people saying we should've taken Mosely instead of Shazier. That is fallacious reasoning. Whether or not it turns out to be the right or wrong move, it was a sound decision to take the younger, faster, less beat-up guy (Mosely had a hip condition and I think a shoulder thing too). You can't be results-oriented with the draft. You just have to make the most sound decision.

            As for the Polamalu contracts, yeah he made it through his 3rd contract. That doesn't mean Shazier would. Woodley got a fat 2nd deal, and took that ("fat") literally. With an injury prone guy like Shazier, I don't think it is realistic to think he will get more durable as he gets older.
            First, Mosley isn't exactly slow and anyone with an eye looking at the tape knew he was a more sound linebacker than Shazier. He is also built for the position. Keep in mind Shazier played much of the time at 215 or below in college. Make no mistake Shazier is an athletic phenom with a massive ceiling. It was also obvious that he has trouble playing at a healthy weight for the position. It was also obvious that he was less fundamentally sound. IMO, as I said before and I will say again Mosley was the better LBr. Do I get why the Steelers aimed for the fences? Sure. I get it. Was it a mistake? Maybe in hindsight but they were not stupid for drafting Shazier. Just IMO it was never the right choice. If he could get healthy and stay healthy? We may be having a different convo.
            Trolls are people too.

            Comment

            • Shawn
              Legend
              • Mar 2008
              • 15131

              #36
              Originally posted by squidkid
              actually no.
              polamalu played in all 16 games his first 3 season and played 13 of the 16 in his fourth season. (95%)
              whereas shaxier has played in 9 out of 16 in 2014, 12 out of 16 in 2015 and 3 out of 4 (and soon to be 3 out of 5) this year.........(66%)
              so this is a HUGE difference eh?
              squid being the poster making some sense??? what has this board come to?
              Trolls are people too.

              Comment

              • NorthCoast
                Legend
                • Sep 2008
                • 26643

                #37
                Originally posted by Captain Lemming
                Actually, I don't see too great a change schematically.
                We often got pressure and sacks bringing 4, there was not suddenly a bunch of exotic blitzes.
                Heck Heyward had 3 sacks alone. He was hurt before

                Tomlin said fundamentals were the reasons for the Philly struggles.

                Just like the offense, the defense just executed better.
                The Depot disagrees with your observations. They documented some very significant changes made defensively for KC game.

                Comment

                • Slapstick
                  Rookie
                  • May 2008
                  • 0

                  #38
                  Polamalu played in all 16 games his rookie season, but started none of them...

                  IMO, that makes a difference...
                  Actually, my post was NOT about you...but, if the shoe fits, feel free to lace that &!+€# up and wear it.

                  Comment

                  • BradshawsHairdresser
                    Legend
                    • Dec 2008
                    • 7056

                    #39
                    Originally posted by NorthCoast
                    The Depot disagrees with your observations. They documented some very significant changes made defensively for KC game.
                    Yep. But that doesn't fit with the narrative some on this board want to stick with.

                    Comment

                    • squidkid
                      Legend
                      • Feb 2012
                      • 5847

                      #40
                      Originally posted by Slapstick
                      Polamalu played in all 16 games his rookie season, but started none of them...

                      IMO, that makes a difference...

                      how so?......
                      steelers = 3 ring circus with tomlin being the head clown

                      Comment

                      • squidkid
                        Legend
                        • Feb 2012
                        • 5847

                        #41
                        Originally posted by NorthCoast
                        I agree. It's the early history comparison that is relevant for Shazier. Maybe he can strengthen and beef up to avoid getting nicked up but so far he seems to be playing a style that doesn't bode well for a long term career in the NFL.
                        As others have pointed out, gotta decide what his contract is worth for playing 12 games a year. $5M/yr might be tops in my mind.

                        12 games a year is 75%. shaxier is not even at 65%
                        steelers = 3 ring circus with tomlin being the head clown

                        Comment

                        • NJ-STEELER
                          Legend
                          • May 2008
                          • 12563

                          #42
                          Mosley Isn't what we needed. He's the old guard type of ILB In a league that's CHAnging more And more with passing.
                          He was responsible for Oakland 2nd to last TD by not dropping back far enough to cut off the The tEs lane.

                          Drafting that high, I want a guy who can make a splash play and turn the game around. Like we've seen shazier do

                          Comment

                          • BradshawsHairdresser
                            Legend
                            • Dec 2008
                            • 7056

                            #43
                            Originally posted by NJ-STEELER

                            Drafting that high, I want a guy who can make a splash play and turn the game around. Like we've seen shazier do
                            Me too, but he can't make splash plays if he's not on the field (or sometimes, on the field but hampered by injury). What the Steelers need is someone who plays like Shazier but is sturdier.

                            Comment

                            • Shoe
                              Hall of Famer
                              • May 2008
                              • 4044

                              #44
                              Originally posted by Shawn
                              First, Mosley isn't exactly slow and anyone with an eye looking at the tape knew he was a more sound linebacker than Shazier. He is also built for the position. Keep in mind Shazier played much of the time at 215 or below in college. Make no mistake Shazier is an athletic phenom with a massive ceiling. It was also obvious that he has trouble playing at a healthy weight for the position. It was also obvious that he was less fundamentally sound. IMO, as I said before and I will say again Mosley was the better LBr. Do I get why the Steelers aimed for the fences? Sure. I get it. Was it a mistake? Maybe in hindsight but they were not stupid for drafting Shazier. Just IMO it was never the right choice. If he could get healthy and stay healthy? We may be having a different convo.
                              Yeah but you are ignoring the fact that Mosely had a hip condition and I think a shoulder condition that were concerning. You're probably right, in that Mosely fit the "LB" position much more, and probably still does.

                              I really love knowing a healthy, motivated Shazier is playing... because that means our short-to-intermediate is locked down. That's how much faith I have in him. BUT... if BAL said they would trade Mosely for Shazier straight up, I think I might have to take the deal. It's all about availability.
                              I wasn't hired for my disposition.

                              Comment

                              • Eddie Spaghetti
                                Hall of Famer
                                • Jul 2008
                                • 4123

                                #45
                                Mosley is making splash plays this year if you are paying attention.

                                sealed the browns game with an int and made a really nice one handed int in the raiders game

                                he's an excellent player. Saying otherwise is foolish

                                Comment

                                Working...