Najee Harris' Run Game

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • crushedspirit
    Pro Bowler
    • Feb 2021
    • 2214

    #76
    RBs do not usually have long careers, their rate of injury is very high, and there always is more supply than demand, (this season has tested that though).

    I read an article in April pertaining to RBs and their low rate of return when that second contract, and sometimes third contract is signed. Highest paid RBs in the last 10 years; they had a 67% chance as a top-10 rusher in year 2, and a 69% in year 3, (right before that second contract). In years 5-8 those players fall to a 40% chance, and beyond year 8 only AP has finished top-10.

    Just look at current guys like McCaffrey, Zeke, and Kamara. Top 3 in average salaries who can't stay on the field consistently this season. Those teams are not getting the value from what they paid. There's a reason why teams pay more for WRs, and even some TEs. There's not much value in paying RBs big money, even when taking in account on the odd chance that you find someone like AP. Might as well use them as much as you can.
    Last edited by crushedspirit; 12-23-2021, 02:08 PM.

    Comment

    • feltdizz
      Legend
      • May 2008
      • 27568

      #77
      Originally posted by crushedspirit
      RBs do not usually have long careers, their rate of injury is very high, and there always is more supply than demand, (this season has tested that though).

      I read an article in April pertaining to RBs and their low rate of return when that second contract, and sometimes third contract is signed. Highest paid RBs in the last 10 years; they had a 67% chance as a top-10 rusher in year 2, and a 69% in year 3, (right before that second contract). In years 5-8 those players fall to a 40% chance, and beyond year 8 only AP has finished top-10.

      Just look at current guys like McCaffrey, Zeke, and Kamara. Top 3 in average salaries who can't stay on the field consistently this season. Those teams are not getting the value from what they paid. There's a reason why teams pay more for WRs, and even some TEs. There's not much value in paying RBs big money, even when taking in account on the odd chance that you find someone like AP. Might as well use them as much as you can.
      I also think there is a bit of “business decisions” when it comes to missing games once you get that big contract.

      A lot of players these days tend to sit at any sign of injury or pain once they secure the bag.

      There are rumblings in Charlotte because McCaffrey has missed a ton of games and his injuries aren’t even contact related. I think he bulked up to prove he could run between the tackles and the extra weight has caused hammie and high ankle sprain injuries.
      Steelers 27
      Rats 16

      Comment

      • Northern_Blitz
        Legend
        • Dec 2008
        • 24382

        #78
        Originally posted by feltdizz
        I also think there is a bit of “business decisions” when it comes to missing games once you get that big contract.

        A lot of players these days tend to sit at any sign of injury or pain once they secure the bag.

        There are rumblings in Charlotte because McCaffrey has missed a ton of games and his injuries aren’t even contact related. I think he bulked up to prove he could run between the tackles and the extra weight has caused hammie and high ankle sprain injuries.
        Or just most rbs his age that get his work load miss a bunch of time because the body can't sustain it in today's NFL as the guys hitting them keep getting bigger, stronger, and faster.

        Comment

        • WindyCitySteel
          Legend
          • Nov 2011
          • 15684

          #79
          Originally posted by feltdizz
          they should play as many as possible unless they are winded..

          QB plays 100%, so do safeties, CB’s and OL..

          we are 6-1 when Watt plays at least 84% of the snaps. Why would I ever want him to play less than that when he is making $30 mill a season?
          Your lack of understanding of the physical demands of the various positions is something. Maybe the Steelers defense would be rags by the end of every season if the DL had a better rotation.

          Comment

          • WindyCitySteel
            Legend
            • Nov 2011
            • 15684

            #80
            Originally posted by "BuzzNuter"
            Najee is a punisher. He delivers force instead of taking it.
            I'm admittedly not up on the news, but when did Newton's 3rd law get repealed?

            Comment

            • "BuzzNuter"
              Pro Bowler
              • Mar 2019
              • 2166

              #81
              Originally posted by WindyCitySteel
              I'm admittedly not up on the news, but when did Newton's 3rd law get repealed?
              They didn't. F=MA. He who accelerates the fastest can overcome the more massive object. That's what I meant when I said Najee has no recoil. He accelerates through impact delivering more force than he potentially could receive if he recoiled for impact.

              Do you remember when we had Mendenhall. We drafted him in the 1st round. It was the 1st time we played the Ravens his 1st year.
              He had the ball ,I don't remember the situation. He was head to head with Ray Lewis. Mendenhall stops and awaits or recoiled from the Ray Ray hit. Lewis devastated him and blew out his shoulder. Mendenhall was soft and all his M with no A was awaiting Lewis' MA which dislocated his shoulder.

              Comment

              • NorthCoast
                Legend
                • Sep 2008
                • 26640

                #82
                Originally posted by WindyCitySteel
                Limiting touches wouldn't limit risk? Lol. Yes, you can get injured on any play, but there are injuries from overuse, too. Google the curse of 400 touches. RBs rarely make it back from that many. And if you can get hurt on any play, the more plays you are in the more chance you have to get hurt.

                Putting all the risk into one guy at the position that takes the most beating is just not smart. Balance the risk in the playcalling and the backfield. No rule saying you're only allowed to have one competent back on the roster.

                Good example with Watt. They let Dupree walk and traded away their best depth player, so when their basket of eggs fell, they all broke.
                Apparently you weren't in on this discussion; post #32 http://www.planetsteelers.com/forums...+back+injuries

                Comment

                • crushedspirit
                  Pro Bowler
                  • Feb 2021
                  • 2214

                  #83
                  The one problem I have with his current usage is that he's being forced to run behind a porous line, and has no room to operate, which means he's taking much more punishment than he has to. It's one thing to feed a RB as he adds up the yardage, it's another to ask him to run into a wall just about every time. At this rate, he won't even last up to his second contract.

                  His 1.7 yds before contact per attempt is amongst the worst. The only other RB who has over 200 attempts that has similar walls to face is Gibson from the WFT. Najee's 13.8 attempts per broken tackle doesn't help his cause as well. Javonte has 5.5 attempts per broken tackle, while Stevenson has 7.3. Those two were drafted later on.

                  Comment

                  • feltdizz
                    Legend
                    • May 2008
                    • 27568

                    #84
                    Originally posted by WindyCitySteel
                    Your lack of understanding of the physical demands of the various positions is something. Maybe the Steelers defense would be rags by the end of every season if the DL had a better rotation.
                    maybe the OL would be better if we rotated more players too?

                    I have no issue with giving a player a break when they are winded.

                    Najee doesn’t play 100% of the snaps.

                    But this idea that he needs a lighter workload to save him from injury is untrue. There is no way to limit a players chances of injury unless he is deactivated.
                    Steelers 27
                    Rats 16

                    Comment

                    • feltdizz
                      Legend
                      • May 2008
                      • 27568

                      #85
                      Originally posted by Northern_Blitz
                      Or just most rbs his age that get his work load miss a bunch of time because the body can't sustain it in today's NFL as the guys hitting them keep getting bigger, stronger, and faster.
                      or… not.

                      Northcoast provided data on touches vs injuries.

                      Not sure if there is a cut off for age vs touches vs injuries.

                      However, I definitely wonder if there is data on huge guaranteed contracts and games missed. I wouldn’t be surprised if players “gut it out” when on there first contract and “ shut it down” once they secure the bag.
                      Steelers 27
                      Rats 16

                      Comment

                      • Buzz
                        Legend
                        • Dec 2017
                        • 8409

                        #86
                        Interesting article from a few years back about correlation between heavy workload and loss of effectiveness with NFL running backs:

                        We live in the era of the disposable NFL running back. Tailbacks have never had less value in the NFL than they do now. Teams have never divvied fewer carries up between more backs...


                        Basically, studies back then showed that a running back with 370 or more carries during the regular season would usually suffer either a major injury or loss of effectiveness the following year. Even more likely if they got into the playoffs and got up to 390. Don't know if statistics in the past decade has continued to fall in line with this.
                        Last edited by Buzz; 12-24-2021, 01:06 PM.

                        Comment

                        • NJ-STEELER
                          Legend
                          • May 2008
                          • 12563

                          #87
                          Originally posted by WindyCitySteel
                          Jonathan Taylor makes me sad. 41st pick in the draft and can take over games like that. I know he has the far better line, but Najee simply doesn't have that breakaway gear in his game. His longest career run at Alabama on that stacked team with pro OLs was only 42 yards, and it came last season.
                          .
                          the bigger problem here in steeler fan land is the thought of not drafting him "because yinz got conners back there".
                          the idea that we can try to upgrade on every position on the defense but let things play out on the offensive side of the ball is nuts

                          Comment

                          • hackjam
                            Pro Bowler
                            • Sep 2021
                            • 1002

                            #88
                            Originally posted by NJ-STEELER
                            the bigger problem here in steeler fan land is the thought of not drafting him "because yinz got conners back there".
                            the idea that we can try to upgrade on every position on the defense but let things play out on the offensive side of the ball is nuts
                            Yet they've used 3 of their past 4 picks in the first three rounds (and 4 of the last 7, and 7 of the last 11) on the offensive side of the ball...

                            Comment

                            • Northern_Blitz
                              Legend
                              • Dec 2008
                              • 24382

                              #89
                              Originally posted by feltdizz
                              or… not.

                              Northcoast provided data on touches vs injuries.

                              Not sure if there is a cut off for age vs touches vs injuries.

                              However, I definitely wonder if there is data on huge guaranteed contracts and games missed. I wouldn’t be surprised if players “gut it out” when on there first contract and “ shut it down” once they secure the bag.
                              That's not what that data says IMO.

                              The comment I was responding to said that they thought Najee would have a career as long as 8 years. I wonder who the last RB was who was still in the top 5 guys in their 8th year in the league.

                              I think you said the comp was AP.

                              I think the fact that guys like Gore and AP are the last guys I can think of who were successful with long careers suggests that guys can't really do it anymore. I think it's because the impacts are getting bigger and bigger. But I could be wrong and there's another reason.

                              And before anyone points to Henry, compare his rookie usage to Najee's. After this season, I think it will be interesting to see how many years it took for Henry to get as many touches as Najee will have by the end of this year? It will be close to 2.5 years I think.

                              Henry did have massive touches in 2019 and 2020. And broke in 2021. We'll see what he looks like when he comes back.
                              Last edited by Northern_Blitz; 12-24-2021, 07:39 PM.

                              Comment

                              • crushedspirit
                                Pro Bowler
                                • Feb 2021
                                • 2214

                                #90
                                Henry was not used much until year 3, and even then he only had 215 carries. I don't see Najee with anything close to having an 8 year career at his current usage rate, and with the hits he's taking.

                                Comment

                                Working...