If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
He was a one year rental that we returned to the lot a half season early..... he's not a difference maker at age 32. Plus there were murmurs the guy wears down quickly.
He was a one year rental that we returned to the lot a half season early..... he's not a difference maker at age 32. Plus there were murmurs the guy wears down quickly.
But he was a good depth piece ... and now, our depth looks pretty iffy at the position.
Ingram is a better rusher than Highsmith we should have played him more. Don't mind trading him but NOT to the Chiefs. Why give Mahomes & Chiefs a player at their weakest position?
According to multiple sources only suitor for Ingram was KC. Not sure what options they had at this point...would you have kept him?
I think we can't know the answer to this without knowing the interpersonal stuff.
Just from an asset management perspective, I think Ingram for the remainder of the season is probably more valuable than the mid-6th we'd expect to get at this point.
But we don't know his personal situation and so we can't have much of an idea about whether or not he'd James Harrison his way through the rest of the season. Standing our ground didn't work well in that situation.
And since we don't sit in on negotiations for these mid to low level UFAs, I don't think we know if these "we want volunteers not hostages" type decisions help make deals for guys like Ingram happen. "Look, we'll take you at this lower price...and if you aren't happy with how your usage at the trade deadline we've done our best in past to help guys that feel like they don't fit move".
I will openly admit that I have a bias here because I don't follow as closely along with other teams in the NFL as I do with the Steelers. So I realize this could be just a perception flaw from where I stand. It just seems that the Steelers have this dilemma creep up with them over the past 1/2 dozen years or so, where they have a disgruntled individual that felt they were going to get more playing time.
I don't know if it's a fair statement...just a feeling.
Ingram is a better rusher than Highsmith we should have played him more. Don't mind trading him but NOT to the Chiefs. Why give Mahomes & Chiefs a player at their weakest position?
NorthCoast put up a graphic in another thread showing pass rush win% on one access and run stop win% on the other .
TJ was amazing at both. Best guy on the chart.
Ingram and Highsmith weren't on the chart so someone asked the author. Here's the response:
I think this shows that your comment "Ingram is a better rusher than Highsmith" is incorrect. At least based on how they've played this year.
Comment