This Is The Freaking Worst...
Collapse
X
-
Watch the ball motion relative to the fan sitting in the background. When it first appears at the bottom of the screen the motion suggests the ball should pass over the hand of the fan in the background. But it instead passes over the fan's head, meaning somehow the path changed in mid air.
But I agree, no way they were going to overturn with that video evidence.
Of all the things we can complain about in this game. The officiating of this call isn't one of them.Comment
-
It absolutely is something we can complain about. If you can see it, then there is no reason for “professionals” to miss it...
It isn’t “barely” perceptible, it is rather easily perceptible....Actually, my post was NOT about you...but, if the shoe fits, feel free to lace that &!+€# up and wear it.Comment
-
Comment
-
Watch the ball motion relative to the fan sitting in the background. When it first appears at the bottom of the screen the motion suggests the ball should pass over the hand of the fan in the background. But it instead passes over the fan's head, meaning somehow the path changed in mid air.
But I agree, no way they were going to overturn with that video evidence.
When I watched it the first time, it looks like the angular velocity increases because the nose of the ball hit his face mask (not the part highlighted in the video). But, that might be a bit of an optical illusion because the ball comes into the frame close to horizontal. And it looks like there's some angular acceleration, but it's hard to judge because we don't have many frames before what I think is the contact.
Ultimately, I think it's inclusive (but I think it's like 90% that it hit Chubb).Comment
-
1) They realized the system was broken last year because the refs were overturning calls based on speculation instead of conclusive evidence.
and
2) They think the system will work if they use it exactly how it was meant to work (i.e. only overturn calls when they are conclusively wrong).Comment
-
Maybe it’s a little extreme, but if you trace a line through the center of the ball, you can definitely see that it changes direction. It can’t change direction spontaneously in the air. The camera is stationary. As is the hand of the fan in the background. If neither of those things moved, you can know that it isn’t some kind of optical illusion.Actually, my post was NOT about you...but, if the shoe fits, feel free to lace that &!+€# up and wear it.Comment
-
What I hope:
1) They realized the system was broken last year because the refs were overturning calls based on speculation instead of conclusive evidence.
and
2) They think the system will work if they use it exactly how it was meant to work (i.e. only overturn calls when they are conclusively wrong).Actually, my post was NOT about you...but, if the shoe fits, feel free to lace that &!+€# up and wear it.Comment
Comment