No need for name calling.
If he signed for 52 with a chance to make 61 mill why can’t that number be used?
The 4 years a 52 isn’t a bad contract to begin with. He could’ve made another 14.5 but we know why he didn’t. He didn’t want to risk an injury. He didn’t risk 409 more chances to get hurt and we missed the playoffs.
It’s not like we won anything in this saga.
Most people claiming victory said Bell wouldn’t get anywhere near the 35 mill guaranteed and thought he would get 10 per year.
If he signed for 52 with a chance to make 61 mill why can’t that number be used?
The 4 years a 52 isn’t a bad contract to begin with. He could’ve made another 14.5 but we know why he didn’t. He didn’t want to risk an injury. He didn’t risk 409 more chances to get hurt and we missed the playoffs.
It’s not like we won anything in this saga.
Most people claiming victory said Bell wouldn’t get anywhere near the 35 mill guaranteed and thought he would get 10 per year.
Comment