It's way too early to worry about Jarvis Jones

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Slapstick
    Rookie
    • May 2008
    • 0

    #31
    Originally posted by Shoe
    He's not an "elite" pass rusher. I think that is pretty obvious. He runs 4.9. He can't beat NFL tackles by simply lining up and whipping them--too slow, too small. But as Dukes said, he does have ability. This is where the coaching and personnel come in.

    Personnel has done their job. They brought in Shazier to team with Timmons. That inside cross blitz should be back in the playbook soon. They also brought in Tuitt, who can provide pressure. Coaching has to do their job now. They've moved Heyward to Jarvis' side, thereby giving him more opportunities with lesser blockers (TEs, RBs). He better feast on those.

    It is these tweaks that are going to say how Jarvis develops, because the guy isn't Von Miller, Aldon Smith, or Clay Matthews. He is in Peezy/Greg Lloyd mold more (both of whom also couldn't beat good OTs very often).
    Running a 4.9 is meaningless when talking about pass rushing...what you need is a quick first step, which he has...

    I've stated this before and you can verify it for yourself:

    Jones' 10 yard split in that 40 time is equal to Aldon Smith's...
    Actually, my post was NOT about you...but, if the shoe fits, feel free to lace that &!+€# up and wear it.

    Comment

    • steelsnis
      Starter
      • Dec 2008
      • 980

      #32
      Originally posted by Slapstick
      Running a 4.9 is meaningless when talking about pass rushing...what you need is a quick first step, which he has...

      I've stated this before and you can verify it for yourself:

      Jones' 10 yard split in that 40 time is equal to Aldon Smith's...
      EXACTLY!

      The only time the 40 matters for a LB is when he picks off a pass or picks up a fumble and is headed the other way. Otherwise it's his short-range quickness.

      Comment

      • RuthlessBurgher
        Legend
        • May 2008
        • 33208

        #33
        Originally posted by Shoe
        They brought in Shazier to team with Timmons. That inside cross blitz should be back in the playbook soon.
        That should be really fun to watch. That inside cross blitz was effective when we used to run it with Farrior and Foote. The upgrade in speed to Shazier and Timmons could make Farrior and Foote look like Casey Hampton and Jamain Stephens trying to run the conditioning test.
        Steeler teams featuring stat-driven, me-first, fantasy-football-darling diva types such as Antonio Brown & Le'Veon Bell won no championships.

        Super Bowl winning Steeler teams were built around a dynamic, in-your-face defense plus blue-collar, hard-hitting, no-nonsense football players on offense such as Hines Ward & Jerome Bettis.

        We don't want Juju & Conner to replace what we lost in Brown & Bell.

        We are counting on Juju & Conner to return us to the glory we once had with Hines & The Bus.

        Comment

        • Oviedo
          Legend
          • May 2008
          • 23824

          #34
          Originally posted by RuthlessBurgher
          That should be really fun to watch. That inside cross blitz was effective when we used to run it with Farrior and Foote. The upgrade in speed to Shazier and Timmons could make Farrior and Foote look like Casey Hampton and Jamain Stephens trying to run the conditioning test.
          The guy on the sideline has to call the play. I've never understood why Timmons is not used more for blitzing.
          "My team, may they always be right, but right or wrong...MY TEAM!"

          Comment

          • papillon
            Legend
            • Mar 2008
            • 11340

            #35
            Originally posted by Oviedo
            The guy on the sideline has to call the play. I've never understood why Timmons is not used more for blitzing.
            Pending on where Timmons starts from don't you have to have someone at least cover his zone briefly to discourage a pass into that area? That might mean Willianms? I don't think so. Jones? Probably not. Heyward or Hood? Doubtful. Worilds? Maybe. Polamalu or Clark? Here are your best options provided the opponent isn't running 3 or 4 verticals.

            Before you start sending people after the quarterback, you need to have some cover behind it, don't you? The Steeler defense was lacking in so many places last year that blaming the play calling is like blaming a fork for being obese.

            Pappy
            sigpic

            The 2025 Pittsburgh Steeler draft

            1.21 - Derrick Harmon, DT, Oregon - Nick Emmanwori, S, S. Carolina
            3.83 - Kaleb Johnson, RB, Iowa - DJ Giddens, RB, Kans St
            3.123 - Will Howard, QB, OSU
            4.156 - JJ Pegues, DT, Ole Miss
            5.185 - Clay Webb, OG, Jack St
            7.229 - Tyrion Ingram-Dawkins, DT, Georgia

            "Football is a physical game, well, it used to be anyways" - Mel Blount

            Comment

            • Shoe
              Hall of Famer
              • May 2008
              • 4044

              #36
              Meaningless?

              Originally posted by Slapstick
              Running a 4.9 is meaningless when talking about pass rushing...what you need is a quick first step, which he has...

              I've stated this before and you can verify it for yourself:

              Jones' 10 yard split in that 40 time is equal to Aldon Smith's...
              I would agree that there isn't a direct correlation between 40 time and playing ability, but to say that it is meaningless, isn't being objective. I'm struggling to think of an OLB with 4.9 speed, let alone an OLB with 4.9 speed who became a star.
              I wasn't hired for my disposition.

              Comment

              • RuthlessBurgher
                Legend
                • May 2008
                • 33208

                #37
                Originally posted by Shoe
                I would agree that there isn't a direct correlation between 40 time and playing ability, but to say that it is meaningless, isn't being objective. I'm struggling to think of an OLB with 4.9 speed, let alone an OLB with 4.9 speed who became a star.
                I don't remember Terrell Suggs 40 time offhand, but I know it wasn't good.
                Steeler teams featuring stat-driven, me-first, fantasy-football-darling diva types such as Antonio Brown & Le'Veon Bell won no championships.

                Super Bowl winning Steeler teams were built around a dynamic, in-your-face defense plus blue-collar, hard-hitting, no-nonsense football players on offense such as Hines Ward & Jerome Bettis.

                We don't want Juju & Conner to replace what we lost in Brown & Bell.

                We are counting on Juju & Conner to return us to the glory we once had with Hines & The Bus.

                Comment

                • Slapstick
                  Rookie
                  • May 2008
                  • 0

                  #38
                  Suggs ran a 4.85, which is what Jones supposedly ran...Jones also reportedly tweaked a hamstring during his 40, but continued with the workout anyway...
                  Actually, my post was NOT about you...but, if the shoe fits, feel free to lace that &!+€# up and wear it.

                  Comment

                  • steelsnis
                    Starter
                    • Dec 2008
                    • 980

                    #39
                    Originally posted by Shoe
                    I would agree that there isn't a direct correlation between 40 time and playing ability, but to say that it is meaningless, isn't being objective. I'm struggling to think of an OLB with 4.9 speed, let alone an OLB with 4.9 speed who became a star.
                    Im not sure why the only 40-time people are using for JJ is the one from the Georgia Pro-Day when he had a bad hammy. According to the Sporting News heading into his final season at Georgia, Jones was listed as running a 4.65 40-yard dash.

                    In his first season at Georgia after transferring from USC, Jones (6-3, 241, 4.65 40-yard dash) displayed the game-changing talent to make plays behind the line—something that was expected of him when he first arrived at USC. Jones has the agility to change directions in a blur to avoid blocks, and the lightning-quick burst to finish plays, which led to his 19½ tackles for loss and 13½ sacks in 2011. With so many NFL teams playing 3-4 defenses, Jones could be a top 10 pick as an outside linebacker because there is a premium on playmakers at that position. Projection: First-round pick

                    Btw, James Harrison was timed at one point at 4.85 in the 40. So again, the 40 doesn't really equate to ability to play LB.

                    Back to Harrison and those "measurables." Can you guess what his 40-yard time was? It was 4.85. I believe he was able to make it to the quarterback over 60 times during his career in Pittsburgh.

                    Oh, and there was that 100-yard dash--he sure looked pretty fast there:

                    Comment

                    • Slapstick
                      Rookie
                      • May 2008
                      • 0

                      #40
                      Truthfully, JH did not look fast in that 100 yard dash...it was a combo of good blocking and the same indomitable will that made an undrafted player who was cut four times into a Defensive Player of the Year...
                      Actually, my post was NOT about you...but, if the shoe fits, feel free to lace that &!+€# up and wear it.

                      Comment

                      • Shawn
                        Legend
                        • Mar 2008
                        • 15131

                        #41
                        Originally posted by Slapstick
                        Truthfully, JH did not look fast in that 100 yard dash...it was a combo of good blocking and the same indomitable will that made an undrafted player who was cut four times into a Defensive Player of the Year...
                        So, what you are saying is JH played with heart. It's that special it factor that made him special. It's why I enjoy seeing it so much...when a guy hits the field and plays like he loves the game.
                        Trolls are people too.

                        Comment

                        • Slapstick
                          Rookie
                          • May 2008
                          • 0

                          #42
                          Originally posted by Shawn
                          So, what you are saying is JH played with heart. It's that special it factor that made him special. It's why I enjoy seeing it so much...when a guy hits the field and plays like he loves the game.
                          I don't think that it's even that...positive.

                          I think that Harrison, much like Lambert, was just a pissed off wrecking ball of pure, concentrated meanness on the field...
                          Actually, my post was NOT about you...but, if the shoe fits, feel free to lace that &!+€# up and wear it.

                          Comment

                          • RobinCole
                            Pro Bowler
                            • Apr 2014
                            • 1358

                            #43
                            I'm not saying Jones fits this description but some players' "game speed" is faster than their "stopwatch speed". I recall that Franco was timed at 4.8 in the 40, which wasn't considered "fast" even in 1972. But when he broke into the clear he was seldom caught if it was a straight-out foot race. They had to have the angle to catch him.

                            Comment

                            • Slapstick
                              Rookie
                              • May 2008
                              • 0

                              #44
                              Originally posted by RobinCole
                              I'm not saying Jones fits this description but some players' "game speed" is faster than their "stopwatch speed". I recall that Franco was timed at 4.8 in the 40, which wasn't considered "fast" even in 1972. But when he broke into the clear he was seldom caught if it was a straight-out foot race. They had to have the angle to catch him.
                              Possibly the most famous example of the vast difference between running in shorts and running in a helmet and pads while carrying a ball?

                              Jerry Rice
                              Actually, my post was NOT about you...but, if the shoe fits, feel free to lace that &!+€# up and wear it.

                              Comment

                              • ikestops85
                                Hall of Famer
                                • Jun 2008
                                • 3724

                                #45
                                Originally posted by Shoe
                                I would agree that there isn't a direct correlation between 40 time and playing ability, but to say that it is meaningless, isn't being objective. I'm struggling to think of an OLB with 4.9 speed, let alone an OLB with 4.9 speed who became a star.
                                Vontaze Burflict ... 5.09 and 5.1 seconds in his 40 at the combine.
                                As many on this site think ... The Rooney's suck, Colbert sucks, Tomlin sucks, the coaches suck, and the players suck.

                                but Go Steelers!!!

                                Comment

                                Working...