So the TFWs get to brag about another "non-losing" season (in this case, "winning," even though the definition allows for .500 in seasons past).
But, a SIXTH straight year without a playoff win. Six. Consecutive. Just how long are we going to go, acting like "non-losing" seasons are good enough? No end in sight. Get used to it. Shades has not sniffed making the Super Bowl since he had a team stacked with Cowher players. Is 12 years long enough of a sample size? If not, how many is? 15? 20?
This is a serious question. I think only 2 teams have not won a playoff game in the same space. 2. Out of 32. But we are told Shades is an awesome head coach. Why?
But, a SIXTH straight year without a playoff win. Six. Consecutive. Just how long are we going to go, acting like "non-losing" seasons are good enough? No end in sight. Get used to it. Shades has not sniffed making the Super Bowl since he had a team stacked with Cowher players. Is 12 years long enough of a sample size? If not, how many is? 15? 20?
This is a serious question. I think only 2 teams have not won a playoff game in the same space. 2. Out of 32. But we are told Shades is an awesome head coach. Why?
Comment