I realize there are already threads critiquing positions, coaches. Most of them are the knee-jerk "fire this guy" type of posts. I thought I'd throw something out there with some real assessments of them.
I've graded each position on a scale of 1-10, with 10 being the best. IMO, anything graded 6 or lower should be addressed during the the offseason; obviously, cuts/contracts can influence need.
OFFENSE
QB - we're still figuring out what we have with Pickett. Mitch's contract was built to be a 1-year deal if he didn't pan out, so the team technically could replace both him and Mason after the season
Position Grade: TBD, between KP's anticipated yet unknown growth AND the uncertainty around MT and MR this is hard to grade. At the moment, this is about a 5 at best
RB - Najee doesn't quite have the speed to get the edge. If WE see that, why doesn't the guy calling plays see that? Because he's more of a throwback to power runners, he needs to have plays called between the tackles. IMO, he's an Alstott who needs a Warrick Dunn to make this a complete backfield by committee. Meanwhile, Jaylen Warren is a backup who is capable of filling in if Najee goes down.
Position Grade: 6, but could easily be a 9 with a complimentary speed back
WR - Pickens is going to be a problem for DBs for years to come. Diontae is pretty good (when he catches the ball; he just doesn't always do that). Claypool needs to use his body. All in all this is actually a good group, but a lot of contracts are coming up.
Position Grade: 8
TE - Muth is dang good, but I wouldn't be upset with a second TE with receiving skills; I was thinking this was the plan for the younger Heyward, but that hasn't panned out
Position Grade: 7
LT - Moore would be a good backup, but is no starter. I hope to see a real LT acquired next offseason; I also wouldn't be opposed to seeing Moore extended with backup $$
Position Grade: 4
LG - see LT assessment, above. Just replace Moore with Dotson
Position Grade: 4
OC - Cole is 'ok'. If not for the left side of the line, this is a potential upgrade spot.
Position Grade: 6.5
RG - Daniels is a capable RG, who got a +.5 in his reaction to the slide-hit on Pickett
Position Grade: 7.5
RT - Chuks has been mostly good. That was a good signing, although some of us didn't like it
Position Grade: 8
DEFENSE
NT - Neither Montravius Adams nor Alualu are getting the job done. I hope to see a priority put on this position, since it hasn't happened in recent years
Position Grade: 4
LDE - Larry O is "ok" when he plays, but his injury isn't helping. It may keep him around for an additional year as another "prove it" contract as a rotational guy. With Wormley and Loudermilk, there's "ok" depth
Position Grade: 7
RDE - Cam Heyward, backed up by Leal is a pretty good package here. That's exactly how you'd hope to see positions lined up for end of career time periods
Position Grade: 10
LOLB - TJ may well be the best pass rusher in the league.
Position Grade: 9.5. This should be a 10, but it's clear that depth is needed, and TJ seems to be following JJ's injury path
LILB - Bush has improved, but just isn't the guy. This team is desperately in need of another ILB
Position Grade: 4
RILB - Jack has been solid, but needs a running mate who is at least his equal, but preferably better.
Position Grade: 7
ROLB - Highsmith gets a bad rub because of the absolutely special stuff happening on the other side of the field from him; he's very Clark Haggans in that he does his job, but is very unspectacular; I wouldn't be opposed to an upgrade, but this isn't a priority
Position Grade: 7
CB - Sutton, Wallace, Witherspoon, Maulet is a big pile of "meh". This team needs a studly cover corner to move each of those guys down one slot in the pecking order
Position Grade: 6
FS - Minkah is in the discussion for best FS in the league. The depth here is solid as well
Position Grade: 10
SS - Edmunds shouldn't have been a 1st round pick, but is certainly a "good" player. Depth here is good as well
Position Grade: 7
There ya have it. You could knee jerk some guys to a 1, but I have a hard time doing that. If the guy is NFL talent, but just isn't getting it done, I can't bring myself to give a 1 - someone mentioned the elite of the elite in a thread and I agree with that. Besides, that's splitting hairs at this point - as stated above, the 6 and below should be addressed.
There - I opened myself up for bashing, but it's what I see on this team.
I've graded each position on a scale of 1-10, with 10 being the best. IMO, anything graded 6 or lower should be addressed during the the offseason; obviously, cuts/contracts can influence need.
OFFENSE
QB - we're still figuring out what we have with Pickett. Mitch's contract was built to be a 1-year deal if he didn't pan out, so the team technically could replace both him and Mason after the season
Position Grade: TBD, between KP's anticipated yet unknown growth AND the uncertainty around MT and MR this is hard to grade. At the moment, this is about a 5 at best
RB - Najee doesn't quite have the speed to get the edge. If WE see that, why doesn't the guy calling plays see that? Because he's more of a throwback to power runners, he needs to have plays called between the tackles. IMO, he's an Alstott who needs a Warrick Dunn to make this a complete backfield by committee. Meanwhile, Jaylen Warren is a backup who is capable of filling in if Najee goes down.
Position Grade: 6, but could easily be a 9 with a complimentary speed back
WR - Pickens is going to be a problem for DBs for years to come. Diontae is pretty good (when he catches the ball; he just doesn't always do that). Claypool needs to use his body. All in all this is actually a good group, but a lot of contracts are coming up.
Position Grade: 8
TE - Muth is dang good, but I wouldn't be upset with a second TE with receiving skills; I was thinking this was the plan for the younger Heyward, but that hasn't panned out
Position Grade: 7
LT - Moore would be a good backup, but is no starter. I hope to see a real LT acquired next offseason; I also wouldn't be opposed to seeing Moore extended with backup $$
Position Grade: 4
LG - see LT assessment, above. Just replace Moore with Dotson
Position Grade: 4
OC - Cole is 'ok'. If not for the left side of the line, this is a potential upgrade spot.
Position Grade: 6.5
RG - Daniels is a capable RG, who got a +.5 in his reaction to the slide-hit on Pickett
Position Grade: 7.5
RT - Chuks has been mostly good. That was a good signing, although some of us didn't like it
Position Grade: 8
DEFENSE
NT - Neither Montravius Adams nor Alualu are getting the job done. I hope to see a priority put on this position, since it hasn't happened in recent years
Position Grade: 4
LDE - Larry O is "ok" when he plays, but his injury isn't helping. It may keep him around for an additional year as another "prove it" contract as a rotational guy. With Wormley and Loudermilk, there's "ok" depth
Position Grade: 7
RDE - Cam Heyward, backed up by Leal is a pretty good package here. That's exactly how you'd hope to see positions lined up for end of career time periods
Position Grade: 10
LOLB - TJ may well be the best pass rusher in the league.
Position Grade: 9.5. This should be a 10, but it's clear that depth is needed, and TJ seems to be following JJ's injury path
LILB - Bush has improved, but just isn't the guy. This team is desperately in need of another ILB
Position Grade: 4
RILB - Jack has been solid, but needs a running mate who is at least his equal, but preferably better.
Position Grade: 7
ROLB - Highsmith gets a bad rub because of the absolutely special stuff happening on the other side of the field from him; he's very Clark Haggans in that he does his job, but is very unspectacular; I wouldn't be opposed to an upgrade, but this isn't a priority
Position Grade: 7
CB - Sutton, Wallace, Witherspoon, Maulet is a big pile of "meh". This team needs a studly cover corner to move each of those guys down one slot in the pecking order
Position Grade: 6
FS - Minkah is in the discussion for best FS in the league. The depth here is solid as well
Position Grade: 10
SS - Edmunds shouldn't have been a 1st round pick, but is certainly a "good" player. Depth here is good as well
Position Grade: 7
There ya have it. You could knee jerk some guys to a 1, but I have a hard time doing that. If the guy is NFL talent, but just isn't getting it done, I can't bring myself to give a 1 - someone mentioned the elite of the elite in a thread and I agree with that. Besides, that's splitting hairs at this point - as stated above, the 6 and below should be addressed.
There - I opened myself up for bashing, but it's what I see on this team.
Comment