Only two college QBs improved in their last season

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • WindyCitySteel
    Legend
    • Nov 2011
    • 15684

    Only two college QBs improved in their last season

    Two of the top six prospects, that is. The rest took a tumble, some in Darnold-esque fashion. College QB ratings in their last two seasons:

    Pickett: 129.6, 165.3
    Ridder: 152.9, 158.7
    Strong: 160.6, 157.0
    Corral: 177.6, 155.3
    Howell: 179.1, 154.2
    Willis: 155.8, 151.1

    If you're going to cite supporting cast, allow me to retort - do you want a QB that needs to be propped up by said cast, or one that elevates it?
  • Chucktownsteeler
    Legend
    • May 2008
    • 6847

    #2
    Well, Pickett came back for his 5th year against less experienced players so I take his improvement with a grain of salt. I'm not sold on him and I think the Joe Burrow affect gets him over-drafted.
    Help me find my post proving I am a Yinzer!

    I will tip my hat to Tomlin if he has a winning record and the team makes the play-offs in the upcoming season.

    Comment

    • flippy
      Legend
      • Dec 2008
      • 17088

      #3
      Originally posted by WindyCitySteel
      Two of the top six prospects, that is. The rest took a tumble, some in Darnold-esque fashion. College QB ratings in their last two seasons:

      Pickett: 129.6, 165.3
      Ridder: 152.9, 158.7
      Strong: 160.6, 157.0
      Corral: 177.6, 155.3
      Howell: 179.1, 154.2
      Willis: 155.8, 151.1

      If you're going to cite supporting cast, allow me to retort - do you want a QB that needs to be propped up by said cast, or one that elevates it?
      I don’t know how to really feel about most of these guys.

      I’ve heard comparisons to Wentz, Smith, Baker, Hurts, etc. Most comparisons are to mediocre QBs.

      Im not even sure what I think about the improvements in performance. Picket made the biggest improvement, but I can also remember wondering doesn’t Pitt have someone better than this kid in years past.
      sigpic

      Comment

      • whisper
        Legend
        • Mar 2020
        • 9423

        #4
        When supposed blue chippers like Leaf, Shuler, JaMarcus Russell, Vince Young, Tim Coach, David Klingler, and Akili Smith end up being total bums, it's nearly impossible to guess what QB ends up doing what.

        Comment

        • Northern_Blitz
          Legend
          • Dec 2008
          • 24382

          #5
          Originally posted by whisper
          When supposed blue chippers like Leaf, Shuler, JaMarcus Russell, Vince Young, Tim Coach, David Klingler, and Akili Smith end up being total bums, it's nearly impossible to guess what QB ends up doing what.
          Unfortunately, you'll probably be right more often than not if you guess "bust".

          Comment

          • feltdizz
            Legend
            • May 2008
            • 27568

            #6
            Originally posted by flippy
            I don’t know how to really feel about most of these guys.

            I’ve heard comparisons to Wentz, Smith, Baker, Hurts, etc. Most comparisons are to mediocre QBs.

            Im not even sure what I think about the improvements in performance. Picket made the biggest improvement, but I can also remember wondering doesn’t Pitt have someone better than this kid in years past.
            Saying a kid is the next Warner, Went, Marino is lazy but we really have nothing else to use besides past QB’s.

            The reality is each of these guys will have some type of career. If Pickett last until 20 and we take him and he doesn’t pan out is that really a bust at 20? It will be disappointing but I think Bust is a label for top 5 guys or QB’s with expectations.

            Damn near every expert claims this class of QB’s is weak.

            Now if we trade up to get one or Willis goes 1st and bombs.. that is a bust.
            Steelers 27
            Rats 16

            Comment

            • NorthCoast
              Legend
              • Sep 2008
              • 26640

              #7
              If you are gonna pick a QB pick the one that is in the 93rd percentile in the last two decades;

              Howell is the youngest quarterback in this class, turning in a productive three seasons at North Carolina in which he threw for 9.2 yards per pass attempt with 92 touchdowns to 23 interceptions. For all prospects since 2000, Howell ranks in the 93rd percentile in career yards per attempt and in the 88th percentile in TD-to-INT rate. While those marks are strong, he is not squeaky clean as he ranks in the 65th percentile in career completion rate, closing his final season out in the 41st percentile.

              Howell posted an 82% on-target rate from a clean pocket this past season, in a season in which his offense lost a ton of talent to the NFL. That was the highest rate in this class. Unfortunately, Howell did not catch too many clean pockets as he was under pressure for 35.1% of his dropbacks in 2021, the second-highest rate in this class, throwing for just 5.5 yards per attempt on those dropbacks (second to last).

              All of that pressure undoubtedly played a role in seeing Howell run more than ever last year. After 181 rushing yards and six rushing through two seasons, Howell jumped up to 828 yards on the ground with 11 touchdowns, something nice to have in your back pocket should that spill over into his NFL career.

              Howell is all about pushing the rock downfield, positing the highest average depth of target (11.0 yards) in this class with 49.3% of his passes past the sticks (third in this class).

              Howell has had a wider range in preseason mocks, so if he fails to get into the first round then it can prolong his path to playing time over first-round selections.

              Comment

              • WindyCitySteel
                Legend
                • Nov 2011
                • 15684

                #8
                Howell's rushing numbers scare me. Does he bail after the first read isn't open?

                Comment

                • SteelerOfDeVille
                  Legend
                  • May 2008
                  • 9069

                  #9
                  Originally posted by WindyCitySteel
                  Two of the top six prospects, that is. The rest took a tumble, some in Darnold-esque fashion. College QB ratings in their last two seasons:

                  Pickett: 129.6, 165.3
                  Ridder: 152.9, 158.7
                  Strong: 160.6, 157.0
                  Corral: 177.6, 155.3
                  Howell: 179.1, 154.2
                  Willis: 155.8, 151.1

                  If you're going to cite supporting cast, allow me to retort - do you want a QB that needs to be propped up by said cast, or one that elevates it?
                  with Howell in particular (who i think the team likes more than they're leading on) - so, he dropped to the neighborhood that everyone else was in. It's not like that's a bad thing. In this off year, his ratings was as good as or better than Picket or Ridder's average... just sayin

                  (same is true for Corral for the most part).
                  2013 MNF Executive Champion!

                  Comment

                  • SteelerOfDeVille
                    Legend
                    • May 2008
                    • 9069

                    #10
                    Originally posted by WindyCitySteel
                    Howell's rushing numbers scare me. Does he bail after the first read isn't open?
                    he had an o-line like the Steelers last-year.... He was just able to avoid he rush and take off - but, i would also guess is why he's like Eff that, i'm not staying with this team - they'll get me killed before I get a chance to get drafted. And because he lost 2 NFL Rb the season before, I'm guessing they didn't have much in the way of RB either.

                    I personally like his fiery demeanor (reminds ME of Phillip Rivers attitude). The Mayfield comparisons are due to size and willingness to run, if you ask me. He doesn't really play like Baker. Also is quick with pre-snap reads - that and his mobility would 100% put him on the short list, whether the team leads on or not - they certainly watched enough of his games to know.
                    2013 MNF Executive Champion!

                    Comment

                    • WindyCitySteel
                      Legend
                      • Nov 2011
                      • 15684

                      #11
                      Originally posted by SteelerOfDeVille
                      with Howell in particular (who i think the team likes more than they're leading on) - so, he dropped to the neighborhood that everyone else was in. It's not like that's a bad thing. In this off year, his ratings was as good as or better than Picket or Ridder's average... just sayin

                      (same is true for Corral for the most part).
                      I'm more interested in trajectory than raw numbers. Baker's career rating was 175 in Oklahoma's system. Tua was 199 at Bama.

                      Comment

                      • SteelerOfDeVille
                        Legend
                        • May 2008
                        • 9069

                        #12
                        Originally posted by WindyCitySteel
                        I'm more interested in trajectory than raw numbers. Baker's career rating was 175 in Oklahoma's system. Tua was 199 at Bama.
                        i'm more concerned with IQ and ability. If you have a crap team around you, you can only do so much...

                        If you put Northern Iowa in the BigTen, you may never get to see a QB shine like he should because they can't block Michigan's pass rushers.. This is partly why the combine and pro days impact rankings. "We didn't know he could do that"
                        2013 MNF Executive Champion!

                        Comment

                        • feltdizz
                          Legend
                          • May 2008
                          • 27568

                          #13
                          Originally posted by WindyCitySteel
                          Howell's rushing numbers scare me. Does he bail after the first read isn't open?
                          He had more designed runs his last year.
                          Steelers 27
                          Rats 16

                          Comment

                          • SteelerOfDeVille
                            Legend
                            • May 2008
                            • 9069

                            #14
                            side note on howell: while i like him, I'd feel better if he were a second rounder... same with Corral...
                            2013 MNF Executive Champion!

                            Comment

                            • feltdizz
                              Legend
                              • May 2008
                              • 27568

                              #15
                              Originally posted by WindyCitySteel
                              I'm more interested in trajectory than raw numbers. Baker's career rating was 175 in Oklahoma's system. Tua was 199 at Bama.
                              and both those schools usually have WR’s
                              open by 10 yards most of the time.

                              Its really hard to scout these guys and predict their success at the next level because they rarely throw into tight windows.
                              Steelers 27
                              Rats 16

                              Comment

                              Working...