Can we just stop already with the ben debate!

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SteelerOfDeVille
    Legend
    • May 2008
    • 9069

    #61
    Originally posted by Northern_Blitz
    The best part about the Cowher's players argument is that it's simultaneously saying that (i) the players are the most important thing for winning / losing and (ii) winning and losing is all because of the coach.

    I agree with point (i).
    Oh... That team that cowher went 8-8 with in his final year?

    And didn't Cowher pass on Brady 5 times or so...Took Tee Martin in front of him. So, Cowher's eye for players sucks (even tho we really know the GM does all that)
    2013 MNF Executive Champion!

    Comment

    • Northern_Blitz
      Legend
      • Dec 2008
      • 24364

      #62
      Originally posted by SteelerOfDeVille
      Oh... That team that cowher went 8-8 with in his final year?

      And didn't Cowher pass on Brady 5 times or so...Took Tee Martin in front of him. So, Cowher's eye for players sucks (even tho we really know the GM does all that)
      I don't think you're being super-serious here...

      But I think it's just that scouting, especially scouting QBs, is really hard.

      There doesn't seem to be a reliable way to predict QB success unless a guy is a total phenom.

      And even then, there was some argument about Leaf > Manning before the draft.

      Comment

      • flippy
        Legend
        • Dec 2008
        • 17088

        #63
        Originally posted by Northern_Blitz
        I don't think you're being super-serious here...

        But I think it's just that scouting, especially scouting QBs, is really hard.

        There doesn't seem to be a reliable way to predict QB success unless a guy is a total phenom.

        And even then, there was some argument about Leaf > Manning before the draft.
        You can pretty much tell if a guy has an arm or not. Beyond that, it’s a crap shoot how fast he’s going to think and process info.
        sigpic

        Comment

        • NorthCoast
          Legend
          • Sep 2008
          • 26633

          #64
          Roethlisberger's numbers against BUF and CIN last year and this year. Honestly, not a huge difference. So two different lines (both horrible), no running game, and QB results are similar. CIN numbers this season are a little skewed from garbage time.

          Rating Comp% Yards yds/att TDs INTs
          BUF 2020 65.9 56.8 187 5.1 2 2
          BUF 2021 83.9 56.3 188 5.9 1 0
          CIN 2020 62.4 52.6 170 4.5 1 1
          CIN 2021 70.9 65.5 318 5.5 1 2
          Roethlisberger's current rating is 79. Have to go all the way back to 2008 when he finished at about 80. Looking at his ratings back then he was all over the place that season. The low was a 15 rating against WAS (and the Steelers won).

          Comment

          • Northern_Blitz
            Legend
            • Dec 2008
            • 24364

            #65
            Originally posted by NorthCoast
            Roethlisberger's numbers against BUF and CIN last year and this year. Honestly, not a huge difference. So two different lines (both horrible), no running game, and QB results are similar. CIN numbers this season are a little skewed from garbage time.

            Rating Comp% Yards yds/att TDs INTs
            BUF 2020 65.9 56.8 187 5.1 2 2
            BUF 2021 83.9 56.3 188 5.9 1 0
            CIN 2020 62.4 52.6 170 4.5 1 1
            CIN 2021 70.9 65.5 318 5.5 1 2
            Roethlisberger's current rating is 79. Have to go all the way back to 2008 when he finished at about 80. Looking at his ratings back then he was all over the place that season. The low was a 15 rating against WAS (and the Steelers won).
            I think this is kind of the point...or at least it will be if the trend continues for a few more games.

            The offense sucks.

            And Ben doesn't look like the solution.

            And Ben isn't going to be playing for us next season.

            So at some point (maybe soon if current trends continue), it might be worth looking to see if any of the other QBs can make chicken salad out of our current offensive situation.

            Even if they are not better QBs in the present, they may be better QBs for this offense...especially Haskins who at least has some level of mobility. Which seems to be a good trait since running for your life seems to be an important part of our QB's job description.

            If we decide to go this route, I think it will be presented as Ben going out on an injury. Because Lord knows he's taking a lot of punishment behind this OL.
            Last edited by Northern_Blitz; 09-29-2021, 02:53 PM.

            Comment

            • SteelerOfDeVille
              Legend
              • May 2008
              • 9069

              #66
              Originally posted by Northern_Blitz
              I don't think you're being super-serious here...

              But I think it's just that scouting, especially scouting QBs, is really hard.

              There doesn't seem to be a reliable way to predict QB success unless a guy is a total phenom.

              And even then, there was some argument about Leaf > Manning before the draft.
              No, i wasn't serious - it was poking fun at some of the bad logic, which seems obvious when used in weird places, like i did there.

              But, sometimes you can tell if a guy has *it* by simply watching him a few times. I saw Drew Brees in college. I knew the hype was around Vick, but I thought Drew would be BETTER. Mind you, Drew was too short, didn't have the arm strength, etc. But, imagine a career of Drew in BnG... I think it'd be better than Ben. (Looking back, I mocked Brees and Fred Smoot that year - but, can't be upset about Hampton and Kendrell Bell).

              But, too many times, we've seen a Jay Cutler (guy with a cannon, but doesn't have it between the ears).

              Honestly, if he is cleared, I'd sell the farm to get Deshaun Watson, who is a known commodity in the NFL and won't take multiple years to get to his prime. I'd give 2 firsts (2022, 2024) and 2 seconds (2022, 2023). And would consider throwing in a young player or two (not named TJ or Minkah) along the way
              2013 MNF Executive Champion!

              Comment

              • feltdizz
                Legend
                • May 2008
                • 27508

                #67
                Originally posted by NorthCoast
                Roethlisberger's numbers against BUF and CIN last year and this year. Honestly, not a huge difference. So two different lines (both horrible), no running game, and QB results are similar. CIN numbers this season are a little skewed from garbage time.

                Rating Comp% Yards yds/att TDs INTs
                BUF 2020 65.9 56.8 187 5.1 2 2
                BUF 2021 83.9 56.3 188 5.9 1 0
                CIN 2020 62.4 52.6 170 4.5 1 1
                CIN 2021 70.9 65.5 318 5.5 1 2
                Roethlisberger's current rating is 79. Have to go all the way back to 2008 when he finished at about 80. Looking at his ratings back then he was all over the place that season. The low was a 15 rating against WAS (and the Steelers won).
                Looks like if Ben doesn't throw to the other team our chances of winning increase.
                Steelers 27
                Rats 16

                Comment

                • Joel Buchsbaum
                  Legend
                  • Jan 2021
                  • 7744

                  #68
                  Originally posted by whatever
                  Tomlin has wasted so many seasons of having loaded rosters.
                  A few of us could see what really needed to be done several seasons ago. Now this what we are left with.
                  Those same fans that praised every draft pick to be bpa and player acquisition, are pretending they didn’t say those things and are now blaming Ben.
                  I didn't praise every pick and if I can say myself my drafts were often better than Colbret's. The Bush trade up cost too much and frankly he's not that good. I would have went with Sweat on round he ( good pass rusher ) Dk Metcalf ( one of the top wr's in the game. You can't stack the line or cover him with a 2nd rate cb ) and taken the Bengal's ILB ( forget his name, he starts ) in round three AND kept or 3 round pick.

                  Now, which draft was better. There is more. Howard over Burns. Said so. And I keep the third that year and select Simmons. He's a pro bowl safety. There is more, but you get the point.

                  Colbert has done a food job in free agency. Picking DB's not so much. I agreed with the Watt selection.
                  Tomlin hasn't won a playoff game in seven years and counting. The earliest will be eight years. I guess that in Art Rooney's II, opinion is worth a 3 year extension.

                  Our 2024 draft looks to be grade A. Our 2023 draft is an A. The roster is talented, but Mike Tomlin is still the head coach.

                  *** Mike Tomlin is the best coach since the AFL- NFL merger that has not won a playoff game in 8 seasons or more. It's either him or Lewis. ***

                  Comment

                  • Joel Buchsbaum
                    Legend
                    • Jan 2021
                    • 7744

                    #69
                    Originally posted by SteelerOfDeVille
                    No, i wasn't serious - it was poking fun at some of the bad logic, which seems obvious when used in weird places, like i did there.

                    But, sometimes you can tell if a guy has *it* by simply watching him a few times. I saw Drew Brees in college. I knew the hype was around Vick, but I thought Drew would be BETTER. Mind you, Drew was too short, didn't have the arm strength, etc. But, imagine a career of Drew in BnG... I think it'd be better than Ben. (Looking back, I mocked Brees and Fred Smoot that year - but, can't be upset about Hampton and Kendrell Bell).

                    But, too many times, we've seen a Jay Cutler (guy with a cannon, but doesn't have it between the ears).

                    Honestly, if he is cleared, I'd sell the farm to get Deshaun Watson, who is a known commodity in the NFL and won't take multiple years to get to his prime. I'd give 2 firsts (2022, 2024) and 2 seconds (2022, 2023). And would consider throwing in a young player or two (not named TJ or Minkah) along the way
                    Watson is radio active. The sinster looking guy ( yes I am serious, looks like a bad guy ) has not spoken much for a reason and what makes you thinks wants to play for the Steelers?
                    Tomlin hasn't won a playoff game in seven years and counting. The earliest will be eight years. I guess that in Art Rooney's II, opinion is worth a 3 year extension.

                    Our 2024 draft looks to be grade A. Our 2023 draft is an A. The roster is talented, but Mike Tomlin is still the head coach.

                    *** Mike Tomlin is the best coach since the AFL- NFL merger that has not won a playoff game in 8 seasons or more. It's either him or Lewis. ***

                    Comment

                    • Captain Lemming
                      Legend
                      • Jun 2008
                      • 16010

                      #70
                      Originally posted by Joel Buchsbaum
                      I didn't praise every pick and if I can say myself my drafts were often better than Colbret's. The Bush trade up cost too much and frankly he's not that good. I would have went with Sweat on round he ( good pass rusher ) Dk Metcalf ( one of the top wr's in the game. You can't stack the line or cover him with a 2nd rate cb ) and taken the Bengal's ILB ( forget his name, he starts ) in round three AND kept or 3 round pick.

                      Now, which draft was better. There is more. Howard over Burns. Said so. And I keep the third that year and select Simmons. He's a pro bowl safety. There is more, but you get the point.

                      Colbert has done a food job in free agency. Picking DB's not so much. I agreed with the Watt selection.


                      Yes, you are an incredible 100 percent prophet as is EVERY NEWBIE who has no verifiable history here.

                      "Often" better?
                      You are being too modest. You are a genius.

                      The team needs scouts. Please share with them your incredible skills at talent evaluation.
                      Last edited by Captain Lemming; 09-29-2021, 06:38 PM.
                      sigpic



                      In view of the fact that Mike Tomlin has matched Cowhers record I give him the designation:

                      TCFCLTC-
                      The Coach Formerly Considered Less Than Cowher

                      Comment

                      • hawaiiansteel
                        Legend
                        • May 2008
                        • 35639

                        #71
                        Originally posted by SteelerOfDeVille
                        Honestly, if he is cleared, I'd sell the farm to get Deshaun Watson, who is a known commodity in the NFL and won't take multiple years to get to his prime. I'd give 2 firsts (2022, 2024) and 2 seconds (2022, 2023). And would consider throwing in a young player or two (not named TJ or Minkah) along the way
                        the Texans have reportedly lowered their trade demands for Watson, and the trade deadline is Nov. 2.

                        look for the Dolphins to land him.

                        Comment

                        • NorthCoast
                          Legend
                          • Sep 2008
                          • 26633

                          #72
                          Originally posted by hawaiiansteel
                          the Texans have reportedly lowered their trade demands for Watson, and the trade deadline is Nov. 2.

                          look for the Dolphins to land him.
                          Good call. Looks likely but I still don't understand this. You trade away multiple first round picks for a franchise QB that very well may get suspended or 'exempted' this season, and then who knows what happens next. That's a lot to pay for a guy that's not on the field.

                          Comment

                          • feltdizz
                            Legend
                            • May 2008
                            • 27508

                            #73
                            Originally posted by NorthCoast
                            Good call. Looks likely but I still don't understand this. You trade away multiple first round picks for a franchise QB that very well may get suspended or 'exempted' this season, and then who knows what happens next. That's a lot to pay for a guy that's not on the field.
                            I’m sure the NFL has probably let interested teams know the level of punishment. More than likely its 8 games max.

                            I wonder if Miami or whoever gets him just sits him the rest of this year.

                            I think what happens next is he plays next year. I believe its still a civil case and not criminal so at most he has to pay up or settle if he wants to move on quickly but it feels like he is going to fight this to the end.
                            Last edited by feltdizz; 10-22-2021, 09:53 AM.
                            Steelers 27
                            Rats 16

                            Comment

                            • Northern_Blitz
                              Legend
                              • Dec 2008
                              • 24364

                              #74
                              Originally posted by NorthCoast
                              Good call. Looks likely but I still don't understand this. You trade away multiple first round picks for a franchise QB that very well may get suspended or 'exempted' this season, and then who knows what happens next. That's a lot to pay for a guy that's not on the field.
                              I think this assumes that the teams wouldn't be in consultation with the league on discipline.

                              I don't get why he wasn't exempted at the beginning of the season.

                              Then he could have been traded after the exemption ended.

                              The league has already shown with AB that you don't even need to be under contract to serve a suspension.


                              I could see the league also making an argument that having him sit out so far this season is like "time served" to a suspension.

                              But all of that would go out the window if he's found guilty of anything (I assume the cases are still under investigation and weren't settled out of court).

                              Comment

                              • Steel Maniac
                                Banned
                                • Apr 2017
                                • 19472

                                #75
                                Originally posted by NorthCoast
                                Good call. Looks likely but I still don't understand this. You trade away multiple first round picks for a franchise QB that very well may get suspended or 'exempted' this season, and then who knows what happens next. That's a lot to pay for a guy that's not on the field.
                                Which shows you the value of a legit franchise QB.

                                Comment

                                Working...