Steelers vs Bumgals

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • skyhawk
    Hall of Famer
    • Dec 2008
    • 3732

    Originally posted by Buzz
    Heck, even Randy Fichtner
    Omfg omfg omfg what? His stench remains.

    Comment

    • papillon
      Legend
      • Mar 2008
      • 11340

      Originally posted by SteelBucks
      And the ravens just kicked a NFL record 66 yard FG to win their game. Hit the crossbar and bounced over.

      I hate today.
      Well, the Lions played prevent defense on 4th and 19 and gave a big play and thus preventing victory so it worked, I guess, just not the way they thought. Why in God's green earth would you play that defense when your standard defense was causing Jackson issues all damn day? They deserved to lose.

      Pappy
      sigpic

      The 2025 Pittsburgh Steeler draft

      1.21 - Derrick Harmon, DT, Oregon - Nick Emmanwori, S, S. Carolina
      3.83 - Kaleb Johnson, RB, Iowa - DJ Giddens, RB, Kans St
      3.123 - Will Howard, QB, OSU
      4.156 - JJ Pegues, DT, Ole Miss
      5.185 - Clay Webb, OG, Jack St
      7.229 - Tyrion Ingram-Dawkins, DT, Georgia

      "Football is a physical game, well, it used to be anyways" - Mel Blount

      Comment

      • NorthCoast
        Legend
        • Sep 2008
        • 26636

        Originally posted by The Man of Steel
        Matt Canada’s offense makes me long for the good ole days of Todd Haley.
        It's what happens when you try to teach an old QB new tricks. And he is a sitting duck back there for these pass rushers.

        Comment

        • NJ-STEELER
          Legend
          • May 2008
          • 12563

          Originally posted by Northern_Blitz
          I think they thought that DD would be back and that his decline last year was medical. But OT was still a huge question mark (as was C).

          I still think that TE was a luxury pick we probably shouldn't have gone for with such big needs on OL. But maybe he was BPA on our board. And a good TE might help with the rebuild.
          my example was this year. but i'm not just talking about this past year.

          a guy like green should have been drafted 2-3 years ago and allowed to learn on the bench and step in this year playing at a higher level. pouncey's decline was clear

          how are you going to do that when you spend so many assets on defense

          Comment

          • Buzz
            Legend
            • Dec 2017
            • 8379

            Originally posted by skyhawk
            Omfg omfg omfg what? His stench remains.
            Not that I really want to bring Fichtner back, but to date, what specifically has Canada done that has improved our offense?

            Comment

            • NJ-STEELER
              Legend
              • May 2008
              • 12563

              Originally posted by papillon
              Well, the Lions played prevent defense on 4th and 19 and gave a big play and thus preventing victory so it worked, I guess, just not the way they thought. Why in God's green earth would you play that defense when your standard defense was causing Jackson issues all damn day? They deserved to lose.

              Pappy
              they got boned on the play before the FG. clear delay of game penalty.'

              the league loves propping up its "stars' though

              Comment

              • Northern_Blitz
                Legend
                • Dec 2008
                • 24373

                Originally posted by skyhawk
                Easily the best kicker of all time, North.
                I think you're right.

                Best since I've been watching anyway.

                Comment

                • Northern_Blitz
                  Legend
                  • Dec 2008
                  • 24373

                  Originally posted by NJ-STEELER
                  my example was this year. but i'm not just talking about this past year.

                  a guy like green should have been drafted 2-3 years ago and allowed to learn on the bench and step in this year playing at a higher level. pouncey's decline was clear

                  how are you going to do that when you spend so many assets on defense
                  I'm not sure if using early picks to have guys sit behind entrenched starters is a great strategy.

                  I think we also have to remember that we had to rebuild the defense after Shazier got hurt.

                  I would have loved to have starter capable guys ready to step in this year. But I think they would have been wasted early draft picks when we needed big help on D (at ILB, S, OLB).

                  Maybe we could argue that we could have taken fewer early round WRs? But that also seems like a good strategy if it's allowing us to avoid 2nd contracts for WRs, which I think are not a good value.

                  In the last 5 or so years, I think it made sense to focus on trying to use picks for guys that were going to contribute in the shorter term since any year could have been Ben's last.

                  It's why I disliked the Mason pick (and the Dobbs pick too). We basically knew those picks weren't going to improve the team in the short term. And I thought it would have been better to get cheap vet backups (or just keep L.Jones).

                  And I think it seems reasonable to think that the QB might be just as big a problem with the O at this point as the OL is IMO.
                  Last edited by Northern_Blitz; 09-26-2021, 05:13 PM.

                  Comment

                  • NorthCoast
                    Legend
                    • Sep 2008
                    • 26636

                    Originally posted by Northern_Blitz
                    I'm not sure if using early picks to have guys sit behind entrenched starters is a great strategy.

                    I think we also have to remember that we had to rebuild the defense after Shazier got hurt.

                    I would have loved to have starter capable guys ready to step in this year. But I think they would have been wasted early draft picks when we needed big help on D (at ILB, S, OLB).

                    Maybe we could argue that we could have taken fewer early round WRs? But that also seems like a good strategy if it's allowing us to avoid 2nd contracts for WRs, which I think are not a good value.
                    Why argue w these guys? Some fail to see the Steelers defense was at the bottom of the league before they upgraded.

                    Comment

                    • Northern_Blitz
                      Legend
                      • Dec 2008
                      • 24373

                      Originally posted by NorthCoast
                      Why argue w these guys? Some fail to see the Steelers defense was at the bottom of the league before they upgraded.
                      Options (probably a bit of all of these things):
                      1) I love to hear myself talk / see my own writing;
                      2) I'm a glutton for punishment; and
                      3) I think NJ is usually pretty reasonable.

                      But I agree that it's odd to argue (a) we missed the playoffs for a few years because our D sucked; (b) we lost to Jax in the playoffs because our defense sucked; and (c) we should have used our best draft capital since then to take offensive guys that weren't going to start for a good portion of their cheap rookie contracts.

                      Comment

                      • Terrapin
                        Pro Bowler
                        • Sep 2017
                        • 2081

                        This team is hot garbage from the top to bottom. As of now I'm praying we don't win another game all year. Get a top 5 pick and get our next QB. Go O line the rest of the draft. And get Tomlin, Canada, and the rest of these idiots the hell out of here already

                        Comment

                        • BURGH86STEEL
                          Legend
                          • May 2008
                          • 6921

                          Originally posted by Northern_Blitz
                          I'm not sure if using early picks to have guys sit behind entrenched starters is a great strategy.

                          I think we also have to remember that we had to rebuild the defense after Shazier got hurt.

                          I would have loved to have starter capable guys ready to step in this year. But I think they would have been wasted early draft picks when we needed big help on D (at ILB, S, OLB).

                          Maybe we could argue that we could have taken fewer early round WRs? But that also seems like a good strategy if it's allowing us to avoid 2nd contracts for WRs, which I think are not a good value.

                          In the last 5 or so years, I think it made sense to focus on trying to use picks for guys that were going to contribute in the shorter term since any year could have been Ben's last.

                          It's why I disliked the Mason pick (and the Dobbs pick too). We basically knew those picks weren't going to improve the team in the short term. And I thought it would have been better to get cheap vet backups (or just keep L.Jones).

                          And I think it seems reasonable to think that the QB might be just as big a problem with the O at this point as the OL is IMO.
                          I think that most teams draft 1st and 2nd round players with the idea that they will be starters or contributors early on.

                          In an ideal world teams could stock pile quality players behind starters. The salary capp is a huge obstacle.

                          Comment

                          • NJ-STEELER
                            Legend
                            • May 2008
                            • 12563

                            Originally posted by Northern_Blitz
                            Options (probably a bit of all of these things):
                            1) I love to hear myself talk / see my own writing;
                            2) I'm a glutton for punishment; and
                            3) I think NJ is usually pretty reasonable.

                            But I agree that it's odd to argue (a) we missed the playoffs for a few years because our D sucked; (b) we lost to Jax in the playoffs because our defense sucked; and (c) we should have used our best draft capital since then to take offensive guys that weren't going to start for a good portion of their cheap rookie contracts.

                            why does out D suck when we had heyward, tuiit, watt, bud, haden as the cornerstones of this defense

                            teams have top ranked defenses without that much talent on that side of the ball. why does this defensive scheme need every player to be a top pick and/or a player that has done so well to earn a big contract haden/schobert

                            why is edmunds a BPA at that time in the first round when you have lamar jackson sitting right there?

                            Comment

                            • NJ-STEELER
                              Legend
                              • May 2008
                              • 12563

                              Originally posted by Terrapin
                              This team is hot garbage from the top to bottom. As of now I'm praying we don't win another game all year. Get a top 5 pick and get our next QB. Go O line the rest of the draft. And get Tomlin, Canada, and the rest of these idiots the hell out of here already

                              from what i'm reading right now, the QB class isn't impressing anyone

                              Comment

                              • Northern_Blitz
                                Legend
                                • Dec 2008
                                • 24373

                                Originally posted by BURGH86STEEL
                                I think that most teams draft 1st and 2nd round players with the idea that they will be starters or contributors early on.

                                In an ideal world teams could stock pile quality players behind starters. The salary capp is a huge obstacle.
                                I agree that you want to maximize the contributions of early round picks while they're underpaid in their 1st contracts.

                                Comment

                                Working...