If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Looking forward to James "stepping up" in the playoffs and McDonald becoming a "deadly" threat out there.
Steeler teams featuring stat-driven, me-first, fantasy-football-darling diva types such as Antonio Brown & Le'Veon Bell won no championships.
Super Bowl winning Steeler teams were built around a dynamic, in-your-face defense plus blue-collar, hard-hitting, no-nonsense football players on offense such as Hines Ward & Jerome Bettis.
We don't want Juju & Conner to replace what we lost in Brown & Bell.
We are counting on Juju & Conner to return us to the glory we once had with Hines & The Bus.
Why would you feature a TE when you have Bell, Brown, and JuJu?
I said the opposite.
That said, there are times when you would feature them. Good TE play against teams with great corners like the Jags is imperative. Beating linebackers up the middle and forcing safeties to come over pulls them from the outside guys.
Why would you feature a TE when you have Bell, Brown, and JuJu?
Read the first few comments. People talk like we have extra room for mediocre guys like that to get a bigger role. A bigger role for one, means a smaller role for another. You throw the ball more to those guys, it takes less from the truly studly guys we do have.
And went on doing nothing but defending James and Grimble...
Nope. Wrong again, amigo. I simply made the mistake of praising the efforts of all of the Steelers’ tight ends over that short stretch of the season. The fact that anyone would include praise for Grimble and James was so offensive to you that you felt the need to go crazy for several pages.
Actually, my post was NOT about you...but, if the shoe fits, feel free to lace that &!+€# up and wear it.
Read the first few comments. People talk like we have extra room for mediocre guys like that to get a bigger role. A bigger role for one, means a smaller role for another. You throw the ball more to those guys, it takes less from the truly studly guys we do have.
I knew the above statement was going to surface at some point when I started this thread. I should have clarified from the beginning that it wasn't my intention at all to take reps away from the "Studly guys". That's what the opposing D-Coordinators are for. My point was/is... if and when defenses double team AB and key on Bell... there are other guys who should be wide open or have favorable matchups that can/should be exploited. I like the increased TE option versus throwing to AB in triple coverage (which we've been known to do).
Comment