who's #2 rant/thoughts

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SteelerOfDeVille
    Legend
    • May 2008
    • 9069

    #16
    i predicted early on we'd see the repeat of Tomlin's 1st draft (Timmons and Woodley). So, I'll predict Cunningham just cuz.

    Basically, tonight should be a lot like last night: there are a handful of positions that the team needs to upgrade. it's going to be hard to F this one up.

    I'd be HAPPY with DB, ILB.
    OK with TE, RB (though Mixon would make "happy" - he's a 1st round talent) or WR
    Any of those positions and I'm good.

    o-line, d-line.. meh
    QB - well, as long as it's not Kizer, I think I'd be ok...
    2013 MNF Executive Champion!

    Comment

    • Oviedo
      Legend
      • May 2008
      • 23824

      #17
      Originally posted by SteelerOfDeVille
      i predicted early on we'd see the repeat of Tomlin's 1st draft (Timmons and Woodley). So, I'll predict Cunningham just cuz.

      Basically, tonight should be a lot like last night: there are a handful of positions that the team needs to upgrade. it's going to be hard to F this one up.

      I'd be HAPPY with DB, ILB.
      OK with TE, RB (though Mixon would make "happy" - he's a 1st round talent) or WR
      Any of those positions and I'm good.

      o-line, d-line.. meh
      QB - well, as long as it's not Kizer, I think I'd be ok...
      If we took Kizer I think I my first reaction would be to throw up in my mouth then I would get really upset. I'd much rather have Nathan Peterman who I think has that "it" factor and has show good play in a pro style system.
      "My team, may they always be right, but right or wrong...MY TEAM!"

      Comment

      • steeler_george
        Hall of Famer
        • Dec 2008
        • 3417

        #18
        Originally posted by Oviedo
        If we took Kizer I think I my first reaction would be to throw up in my mouth then I would get really upset. I'd much rather have Nathan Peterman who I think has that "it" factor and has show good play in a pro style system.
        I keep hearing that about Peterman, I would prefer taking either one of these 2 QB over Kermit-Yoda Mahonnes, oh that voice so annoying!

        Comment

        • winwithd
          Starter
          • Nov 2009
          • 895

          #19
          Is it too early for TE Shaheen, end of 2nd? I'd like to see Obi, too. Good to have some size back there.

          Comment

          • JUST-PLAIN-NASTY
            Hall of Famer
            • May 2008
            • 3937

            #20
            Cunningham & a long list of DBS...But if Kizer falls that far he is the pick.

            Comment

            • diamondlucy
              Starter
              • Jan 2017
              • 506

              #21
              Originally posted by JUST-PLAIN-NASTY
              Cunningham & a long list of DBS...But if Kizer falls that far he is the pick.



              Better be careful sir...I was poking fun last night about Kizer being a Steeler..and I was verbally murdered. But besides, with the Jags, and even the Cards still wanting QB's for their future....I doubt he will drop that far. Maybe not even past 35.

              Comment

              • JUST-PLAIN-NASTY
                Hall of Famer
                • May 2008
                • 3937

                #22
                That stuff doesn't bother me. Kizer needs to sit awhile. If he has to play out of the gate it could be a problem. He needs to be in the right situation & he could flourish. Ceiling is a franchise QB in that situation.

                The reason I say you take him is he shouldn't be there. He very easily could be gone. Some say he plays another year he potentially is a Top 10.

                Comment

                Working...