You miss the point. The position is overpaid relative to their ability to contribute to actual championships. The highest paid tier of receivers is always overpaid.
In recent years there is a shocking lack of correlation between top receivers (all pro level) and actual championships. QB is the other extreme. A great QB is always money well spent.
Let me add. Besides QB, elite DEFENSIVE TALENT is more important than offensive talent when looking at what actually contributes to championships. We have seen the elite in the league at linebacker, safety, corner, all more important than elite receiver talent in championships.
Now you put big money in a receiver when a very good one is a dime a dozen? Santonio types can be Super Bowl MVPs because the QB is what matters as long as you have "good" receivers.
In recent years there is a shocking lack of correlation between top receivers (all pro level) and actual championships. QB is the other extreme. A great QB is always money well spent.
Let me add. Besides QB, elite DEFENSIVE TALENT is more important than offensive talent when looking at what actually contributes to championships. We have seen the elite in the league at linebacker, safety, corner, all more important than elite receiver talent in championships.
Now you put big money in a receiver when a very good one is a dime a dozen? Santonio types can be Super Bowl MVPs because the QB is what matters as long as you have "good" receivers.

Comment