Ben: Be careful with Le'Veon Bell

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • hawaiiansteel
    Legend
    • May 2008
    • 35651

    Ben: Be careful with Le'Veon Bell

    Roethlisberger: Be careful with RB

    Updated: December 2, 2014
    By Scott Brown | ESPN.com

    PITTSBURGH -- Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger called Le'Veon Bell the "best all-around back in the game," but he also expressed concern about the second-year player's workload.

    Bell, the only NFL player with at least 1,000 rushing yards and 600 receiving yards this season, played all but two of the Steelers' 90 offensive snaps in a 35-32 loss to the New Orleans Saints on Sunday. He carried the ball a career-high 33 times in the Steelers' previous game, a 27-24 win at Tennessee on Nov. 17.



    Le'Veon Bell played all but two snaps for the Steelers' offense Sunday vs. the Saints.

    "I don't know of a running back since I've been here that has basically been able to play every single snap, but you do have to be careful," Roethlisberger said Tuesday during his weekly radio show on 93.7 The Fan in Pittsburgh. "I hope we don't run him into the ground if you will, but it's that stretch of the year where everyone's going to give it everything they have. He probably wants to be in there every single play because that's the type of player he is."

    Bell piled up 254 yards of total offense against the Saints. Rookie running back Dri Archer played three snaps and received just one carry.

    Roethlisberger said the key to making the 5-foot-8, 173-pound Archer a bigger part of the offense is using him on regular plays since opposing teams are looking for trick plays when they speedy scatback is in the game.

    Roethlisberger's more immediate concern is playing better after he threw two interceptions against the Saints and completed just 19 of 42 passes before leading two late touchdown drives. He ended up with 435 passing yards total but said he was in "disbelief" after a game in which he consistently overthrew his receivers.

    "I just didn't play well and for no rhyme or reason," Roethlisberger said. "I was just disappointed that I didn't make all of the throws that I wanted to make, and you've got to win the home games. I just feel like I let a lot of people down."

    Roethlisberger said he had some mechanical issues during the game and that he didn't always step into his throws. The 11th-year veteran hurt his right hand in the first quarter when he hit it against a wrist pad of a Saints defensive player while throwing a pass but he did not use that as an excuse for his scattershot passing.

    Roethlisberger and the Steelers visit the Cincinnati Bengals on Sunday in a game he called a "must-win." The Bengals are 8-3-1 and lead the AFC North but they play the Steelers (7-5) twice this month.

    "It's not over yet," Roethlisberger said. "I think that was kind of the mood yesterday. We still control our destiny."

    [URL]http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/11967813/ben-roethlisberger-pittsburgh-steelers-says-leveon-bell-workload-concern[/URL]
  • SidSmythe
    Hall of Famer
    • Sep 2008
    • 4708

    #2
    This is a concern if they're going to pay him a HUGE contract in 2 yrs.

    IF NOT, run him 'til the wheels fall off.
    Here We Go Steelers, Here We Go...
    Here We Go Steelers, Here We Go...
    Here We Go Steelers, Here We Go...!!!

    Comment

    • feltdizz
      Legend
      • May 2008
      • 27564

      #3
      makes me wonder if the coaching staff screwed up by not getting Blount more touches...
      Steelers 27
      Rats 16

      Comment

      • feltdizz
        Legend
        • May 2008
        • 27564

        #4
        Originally posted by SidSmythe
        This is a concern if they're going to pay him a HUGE contract in 2 yrs.

        IF NOT, run him 'til the wheels fall off.
        I'm pretty sure we plan on keeping Bell long term.
        Steelers 27
        Rats 16

        Comment

        • Snatch98
          Pro Bowler
          • May 2008
          • 1451

          #5
          Originally posted by SidSmythe
          This is a concern if they're going to pay him a HUGE contract in 2 yrs.

          IF NOT, run him 'til the wheels fall off.
          Isn't the goal to keep your stud players around? Why wouldn't they offer him a mondo deal when his rookie contract runs out? He's in his second year and at the elite level.

          Comment

          • pittpete
            Legend
            • Aug 2008
            • 6825

            #6
            Lighten his load by giving Archer line plunges
            sigpic

            Comment

            • Ghost
              Legend
              • May 2008
              • 6413

              #7
              Time to unleash Josh "The Beast" Harris! (I may or may not have just made up that nickname...)
              sigpic

              Comment

              • RuthlessBurgher
                Legend
                • May 2008
                • 33208

                #8
                Originally posted by Ghost
                Time to unleash Josh "The Beast" Harris! (I may or may not have just made up that nickname...)
                I did notice at the game on Sunday that Harris' build is sort of Deeboesque. Curious to see what we possibly may have here...
                Steeler teams featuring stat-driven, me-first, fantasy-football-darling diva types such as Antonio Brown & Le'Veon Bell won no championships.

                Super Bowl winning Steeler teams were built around a dynamic, in-your-face defense plus blue-collar, hard-hitting, no-nonsense football players on offense such as Hines Ward & Jerome Bettis.

                We don't want Juju & Conner to replace what we lost in Brown & Bell.

                We are counting on Juju & Conner to return us to the glory we once had with Hines & The Bus.

                Comment

                • Shawn
                  Legend
                  • Mar 2008
                  • 15131

                  #9
                  He is big and he is fast. That's what we know.
                  Trolls are people too.

                  Comment

                  • 7 UP
                    Starter
                    • Nov 2011
                    • 878

                    #10
                    Originally posted by RuthlessBurgher
                    I did notice at the game on Sunday that Harris' build is sort of Deeboesque. Curious to see what we possibly may have here...
                    Im with you. Its time to feed "the Beast"!!! Lets get John Harris involved in this offense. Or wait, its Josh right? Yeah Josh. Lets unleash the beast Josh Harris.

                    Comment

                    • NorthCoast
                      Legend
                      • Sep 2008
                      • 26639

                      #11
                      For as bad as Roethlisberger played last game, it would have been a hideously ugly game without Bell's contribution. You would like to think the all his yards will actually lead to the team getting to the post-season. Otherwise it was a lot of wear and tear for nothing... of course, that goes for all the players but moreso for the hard to replace skill positions.

                      Comment

                      • MCHammer
                        Starter
                        • Aug 2010
                        • 574

                        #12
                        Roethlisberger said the key to making the 5-foot-8, 173-pound Archer a bigger part of the offense is using him on regular plays since opposing teams are looking for trick plays when they speedy scatback is in the game.
                        I'm no NFL draft wizard, but I'm thinking the key is not to reach for a gadget player in the 3rd round when you need to rebuild at corner. I'm also thinking making Archer a bigger part of our "regular plays" sounds a lot like throwing good money after bad. Like doubling down on a sh*tty hand because you've already invested more than you should have.

                        Which is why you shouldn't draft gadget players, let alone in the 3rd round.

                        Comment

                        • bostonsteeler
                          Pro Bowler
                          • Oct 2008
                          • 1529

                          #13
                          Originally posted by MCHammer
                          I'm no NFL draft wizard, but I'm thinking the key is not to reach for a gadget player in the 3rd round when you need to rebuild at corner. I'm also thinking making Archer a bigger part of our "regular plays" sounds a lot like throwing good money after bad. Like doubling down on a sh*tty hand because you've already invested more than you should have.

                          Which is why you shouldn't draft gadget players, let alone in the 3rd round.
                          The guy is crazy fast and can leap. Can they convert him to a corner?

                          Comment

                          • pittpete
                            Legend
                            • Aug 2008
                            • 6825

                            #14
                            Wouldnt mind seeing a jetsweep or two but this may be too advanced for Haley.
                            sigpic

                            Comment

                            • WindyCitySteel
                              Legend
                              • Nov 2011
                              • 15684

                              #15
                              Originally posted by MCHammer
                              I'm no NFL draft wizard, but I'm thinking the key is not to reach for a gadget player in the 3rd round when you need to rebuild at corner. I'm also thinking making Archer a bigger part of our "regular plays" sounds a lot like throwing good money after bad. Like doubling down on a sh*tty hand because you've already invested more than you should have.

                              Which is why you shouldn't draft gadget players, let alone in the 3rd round.
                              You think they would have learned from the failed Chris Rainey experiment. Throw in other brain dead mid round picks like Landry Jones and Dan Sepulveda, and you have to wonder what Colbert was thinking. I mean, he really turned dumb all of the sudden in 2007.

                              I wonder what changed?

                              Comment

                              Working...