Glass half full

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • feltdizz
    Legend
    • May 2008
    • 27531

    #16
    Originally posted by sick beats
    F this. Making rose colored excuses for losing to the worst teams on the planet is lame. This team shouldn't be 1-8 vs. .200 teams and worse. Stop the excuses.
    I have to agree...
    Steelers 27
    Rats 16

    Comment

    • brazilsteel
      Backup
      • Sep 2014
      • 182

      #17
      Originally posted by WindyCitySteel
      Funny, but I have no doubt Brady and Co. would drop another double nickel on this team.
      It would be funny if it wasn't so tragic. The only hope of playing against Denver would be Ben being fired up because of Sanders' comments.
      If I spell a word incorrectly or make a grammar mistake, I apologize. English is not my native language.

      Comment

      • Shoe
        Hall of Famer
        • May 2008
        • 4044

        #18
        Originally posted by Captain Lemming
        All this moaning about losing to bad teams?

        On the one hand we ALL want to never lose, true.

        But we have beaten (some splits) the best teams on our schedule too.

        Given the same record, I'd like a team that has proven ability to beat the best teams we play over one that beats all the scrubs and wilts when the spotlight is on. Like the Natti does.

        Say we wind up 10-6, do you want those loses to be the scrubs or the best teams?
        The point is that the two sides shouldn't be exclusive.

        A team that beats good teams shouldn't lose to garbage teams. Again, this wouldn't be an issue (everyone loses, even occasionally to garbage teams). But we seem to lose so often to those teams... fans would just like to know why.
        I wasn't hired for my disposition.

        Comment

        • Slapstick
          Rookie
          • May 2008
          • 0

          #19
          Originally posted by Shoe
          The point is that the two sides shouldn't be exclusive.

          A team that beats good teams shouldn't lose to garbage teams. Again, this wouldn't be an issue (everyone loses, even occasionally to garbage teams). But we seem to lose so often to those teams... fans would just like to know why.
          I'm sure the team would also like to know why...I would imagine that if they regarded the opponent as garbage, that could be a large part of the problem...
          Actually, my post was NOT about you...but, if the shoe fits, feel free to lace that &!+€# up and wear it.

          Comment

          • Iron City Inc.
            Hall of Famer
            • Jun 2013
            • 3237

            #20
            Originally posted by Slapstick
            Are we better than last year? Significantly so...

            Are we good enough to make the playoffs? Possibly...

            Are we a SB contender? At this point, I'd say, "Not yet."
            Got to agree right down the line.

            Seems like everyone has an opinion on why we are not a consistent team. Fact is we are not consistent and we have to live with it. However if lack of experience has anything to do with the inconsistency then one has at least got to believe as we move into the final 3rd of the year it should get better.

            Comment

            • hawaiiansteel
              Legend
              • May 2008
              • 35649

              #21

              Comment

              • papillon
                Legend
                • Mar 2008
                • 11340

                #22
                Originally posted by hawaiiansteel
                That's interesting, at the beginning of the year each team has a 39% chance of making the playoffs and after one week, one half of the NFL is down to 25% by being 0-1. It also gives you an indication how important a good start is to a successful year which the Steelers haven't been good at recently. The Jets game cost them 12%.

                Pappy
                Last edited by papillon; 11-11-2014, 10:46 PM.
                sigpic

                The 2025 Pittsburgh Steeler draft

                1.21 - Derrick Harmon, DT, Oregon - Nick Emmanwori, S, S. Carolina
                3.83 - Kaleb Johnson, RB, Iowa - DJ Giddens, RB, Kans St
                3.123 - Will Howard, QB, OSU
                4.156 - JJ Pegues, DT, Ole Miss
                5.185 - Clay Webb, OG, Jack St
                7.229 - Tyrion Ingram-Dawkins, DT, Georgia

                "Football is a physical game, well, it used to be anyways" - Mel Blount

                Comment

                • Slapstick
                  Rookie
                  • May 2008
                  • 0

                  #23
                  Originally posted by papillon
                  That's interesting, at the beginning of the year each team has a 39% chance of making the playoffs and after one week, one half of the NFL is down to 25% by being 0-1. It also gives you an indication how important a good start is to a successful year which the Steelers haven't been good at recently. The Jets game cost them 12%.

                  Pappy
                  Actually, it cost them 22%...

                  7-3 = 84%

                  6-4 = 62%
                  Actually, my post was NOT about you...but, if the shoe fits, feel free to lace that &!+€# up and wear it.

                  Comment

                  • K Train
                    Hall of Famer
                    • Jan 2014
                    • 3685

                    #24
                    They are a frustrating team...not great, not bad but have moments of each. They are right in the thick of it though, the offense couldn't get it done last week, but damn Richardson and Wilkerson were everything they have been billed up to be

                    Comment

                    • Shawn
                      Legend
                      • Mar 2008
                      • 15131

                      #25
                      Interesting factoid...the Steelers are 1-8 in their last 9 games against .200 teams. That is what any statistician would call a trend.
                      Trolls are people too.

                      Comment

                      • Flasteel
                        Hall of Famer
                        • May 2008
                        • 4004

                        #26
                        Well...at least we don't have to worry about them peaking too soon.
                        sigpic

                        Comment

                        • hawaiiansteel
                          Legend
                          • May 2008
                          • 35649

                          #27
                          Originally posted by Flasteel
                          Well...at least we don't have to worry about them peaking too soon.
                          now that's what I call looking at a glass half full...

                          Comment

                          Working...