Does anyone else not see a huge dropoff when Worilds replaces LaMarr? Which do you see as the better value for the $$$$?
Worilds vs. Woodley
Collapse
X
-
Tags: None
-
Give me Worilds and 61 million dollar relief. His overall game is better.[url=http://img525.imageshack.us/i/steelers2010.jpg/]http://img525.imageshack.us/img525/2...eelers2010.jpg[/url]Comment
-
I have always thought that Worilds is better on the left in Woodley's spot. He doesn't have the speed to beat the better LTs of the league but he's got enough strength & quicks to hassle the RTs. That said, he knows he's playing for a contract whether in Pittsburgh or somewhere else, so you'll see high effort when he gets the start.It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust & sweat & blood...Comment
-
-
[url=http://img525.imageshack.us/i/steelers2010.jpg/]http://img525.imageshack.us/img525/2...eelers2010.jpg[/url]Comment
-
Also last year in limited action, he had just as many sacks as Wood.[url=http://img525.imageshack.us/i/steelers2010.jpg/]http://img525.imageshack.us/img525/2...eelers2010.jpg[/url]Comment
-
a 1 game sample size. Awesome analysis.
I have seen woirlds as a starter when given a chance. No thanks.Comment
-
-
I get the argument that woodleys play hasn't met his contract, no beef with that.
but to say woirlds is the answer, well I just can't go there.Comment
-
For a converted player Wood is good in zone. Has to be the reason he drops in zone so much or that is the game plan from the other team to keep him from rushing so much. Is that what we just seen in the game today no need to game plan for Worilds? Worilds is a good player at times. Tough call who is really better. Still think Woodley is or can be the better pash rusher.Comment
Comment