Worilds vs. Woodley

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BradshawsHairdresser
    Legend
    • Dec 2008
    • 7056

    Worilds vs. Woodley

    Does anyone else not see a huge dropoff when Worilds replaces LaMarr? Which do you see as the better value for the $$$$?
  • squidkid
    Legend
    • Feb 2012
    • 5847

    #2
    one is soft and has money, the other is hungry and wants money
    steelers = 3 ring circus with tomlin being the head clown

    Comment

    • Steelhere10
      Hall of Famer
      • May 2008
      • 3849

      #3
      Give me Worilds and 61 million dollar relief. His overall game is better.
      [url=http://img525.imageshack.us/i/steelers2010.jpg/]http://img525.imageshack.us/img525/2...eelers2010.jpg[/url]

      Comment

      • Steel Life
        Pro Bowler
        • May 2008
        • 1535

        #4
        I have always thought that Worilds is better on the left in Woodley's spot. He doesn't have the speed to beat the better LTs of the league but he's got enough strength & quicks to hassle the RTs. That said, he knows he's playing for a contract whether in Pittsburgh or somewhere else, so you'll see high effort when he gets the start.
        It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust & sweat & blood...

        Comment

        • Eddie Spaghetti
          Hall of Famer
          • Jul 2008
          • 4123

          #5
          overall game is better than woodleys?

          no way, no how.

          Comment

          • squidkid
            Legend
            • Feb 2012
            • 5847

            #6
            Originally posted by Eddie Spaghetti
            overall game is better than woodleys?

            no way, no how.
            woodley doesnt make many tackles
            steelers = 3 ring circus with tomlin being the head clown

            Comment

            • Steelhere10
              Hall of Famer
              • May 2008
              • 3849

              #7
              Originally posted by Eddie Spaghetti
              overall game is better than woodleys?

              no way, no how.
              Worilds have more tackles in limited action, why not. Today he had 7 tackles 4 hurries and a sack. Again why not.
              [url=http://img525.imageshack.us/i/steelers2010.jpg/]http://img525.imageshack.us/img525/2...eelers2010.jpg[/url]

              Comment

              • Steelhere10
                Hall of Famer
                • May 2008
                • 3849

                #8
                Also last year in limited action, he had just as many sacks as Wood.
                [url=http://img525.imageshack.us/i/steelers2010.jpg/]http://img525.imageshack.us/img525/2...eelers2010.jpg[/url]

                Comment

                • Eddie Spaghetti
                  Hall of Famer
                  • Jul 2008
                  • 4123

                  #9
                  a 1 game sample size. Awesome analysis.

                  I have seen woirlds as a starter when given a chance. No thanks.

                  Comment

                  • DukieBoy
                    Hall of Famer
                    • May 2008
                    • 3488

                    #10
                    Worilds has played well in that LOLB position. It seems to fit him much better than the right.





                    Comment

                    • BradshawsHairdresser
                      Legend
                      • Dec 2008
                      • 7056

                      #11
                      Your opinion--which of the two is better in coverage?

                      Comment

                      • squidkid
                        Legend
                        • Feb 2012
                        • 5847

                        #12
                        Originally posted by BradshawsHairdresser
                        Your opinion--which of the two is better in coverage?
                        woodley.........
                        steelers = 3 ring circus with tomlin being the head clown

                        Comment

                        • Eddie Spaghetti
                          Hall of Famer
                          • Jul 2008
                          • 4123

                          #13
                          I get the argument that woodleys play hasn't met his contract, no beef with that.

                          but to say woirlds is the answer, well I just can't go there.

                          Comment

                          • SS Laser
                            Pro Bowler
                            • Apr 2009
                            • 1929

                            #14
                            For a converted player Wood is good in zone. Has to be the reason he drops in zone so much or that is the game plan from the other team to keep him from rushing so much. Is that what we just seen in the game today no need to game plan for Worilds? Worilds is a good player at times. Tough call who is really better. Still think Woodley is or can be the better pash rusher.

                            Comment

                            • DukieBoy
                              Hall of Famer
                              • May 2008
                              • 3488

                              #15
                              Woodley seems to grade out very well with the experts this year. He is expensive, though.





                              Comment

                              Working...