and I believe that is what Art said ... "we need to be able to run the ball more effectively". Not that we need to commit more to the run game. We just need to keep Ben out of the 3rd and 8's and get him into more of the 3rd and 3's. That way we can utilize ALL of his talent.
5 Steelers Ready To Breakout In 2012, Part I: Offense
Collapse
X
-
As many on this site think ... The Rooney's suck, Colbert sucks, Tomlin sucks, the coaches suck, and the players suck.
but Go Steelers!!!

-
How qre being able to run effectively and winning football games mutually exclusive? Look at the final four teams last year -- the 49ers had a strong running game, as did the Ravens. The pats* were able to run effectively, thus preventing teams from loading up too much to stop the pass. The Giants could also create enough of a threat with the run game.
The offense doesn't need to be three yards and a cloud of dust, but an effective ground game that forces defenses to play straight up will only help the passing game.Comment
-
you don't believe that by running the ball more effectively (i.e. near the goal line or in short yardage situations) that might enable us to win more games?)Comment
-
I would rather use my skill players and use the $100 million QB I am paying to win games.
If they would rather obsess over the run and re-create 1975? Send Ben on his way, and load up on RBs and defense.
The defense will NEVER be blamed for their faults. It will always be the offense who gets torched.Comment
-
Where were the Giants and Pats ranked in rushing last season?How qre being able to run effectively and winning football games mutually exclusive? Look at the final four teams last year -- the 49ers had a strong running game, as did the Ravens. The pats* were able to run effectively, thus preventing teams from loading up too much to stop the pass. The Giants could also create enough of a threat with the run game.
The offense doesn't need to be three yards and a cloud of dust, but an effective ground game that forces defenses to play straight up will only help the passing game.Comment
-
I think it's pretty clear that Crash would rather see ben play well than the steelers win the football game.
I have never seen a bigger mancrush in all my years on the interweb.
just downright spooky.Comment
-
I would rather this organization realize that it's 2012 and not 1975.
You win by throwing the football and you win with speed. You don't win with dinosaur football.
What were the Steelers ranked in rushing in 2008?Comment
-
I'm pretty confident the rooneys know what year it is. I have never heard the term "dinosaur football" come from anyone associated with the team. just you.
why is running the ball more effectively a bad thing?
wouldn't that give the steelers a better chance to win football games?Comment
-
Comment
-
Yup...scoring TD's is what counts. Don't care if we run the ball 14 times in a row or pass the ball 14 times in a row. As long as our sucktastic kicker is lining up for a makeable PAT instead of a questionable FG, I'll be happy.Steeler teams featuring stat-driven, me-first, fantasy-football-darling diva types such as Antonio Brown & Le'Veon Bell won no championships.
Super Bowl winning Steeler teams were built around a dynamic, in-your-face defense plus blue-collar, hard-hitting, no-nonsense football players on offense such as Hines Ward & Jerome Bettis.
We don't want Juju & Conner to replace what we lost in Brown & Bell.
We are counting on Juju & Conner to return us to the glory we once had with Hines & The Bus.Comment
-
I have no idea. But I do know that they both could run if teams dropped into a cover two with the safeties deep or against a nickel package.
I'm not saying that the Steelers shouldn't use Ben, the WRs and Miller. What I'm saying is that a balanced attack will benefit Ben and the WRs.Comment

Comment