Steelers shopping Wallace?

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 3
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 3 template Next
  • Sugar
    Hall of Famer
    • Oct 2008
    • 3700
    #31
    Originally posted by Oviedo
    One injury and he loses the one thing he has. That is why they can't overpay for him. If Brown loses a step he still has other skills he can rely on as a possession receiver. Not sure Wallace does.
    IMO, you don't go into a contract concerned about a possible injury from a player who isn't shown to be injury prone. Why sign anybody to a big deal then?

      Comment

      • RuthlessBurgher
        Legend
        • May 2008
        • 33208
        #32
        Originally posted by Oviedo
        Brees has proven alot more than Wallace for alot longer, but you knew that.
        But what is worse? Brees threatening to not participate in any Saints workouts under a $14.4 million franchise tag (when his team needs its on-field leader most now that their head coach has been suspended for a year), or Wallace threatening to not participate in any Steelers workouts under a $2.74 million RFA tender?

        Remember that the Saints have already put $60 million in Brees' bank account, while Wallace has earned a total of $1.74 million on his rookie contract for a 3rd round pick.
        Steeler teams featuring stat-driven, me-first, fantasy-football-darling diva types such as Antonio Brown & Le'Veon Bell won no championships.

        Super Bowl winning Steeler teams were built around a dynamic, in-your-face defense plus blue-collar, hard-hitting, no-nonsense football players on offense such as Hines Ward & Jerome Bettis.

        We don't want Juju & Conner to replace what we lost in Brown & Bell.

        We are counting on Juju & Conner to return us to the glory we once had with Hines & The Bus.

          Comment

          Previous 1 2 3 template Next
          Working...