Q & A: Colbert on the '10 Draft

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Jooser
    Legend
    • Jul 2008
    • 5102

    Q & A: Colbert on the '10 Draft

    Kevin Colbert on the 2010 NFL Draft

    Posted 1 hour ago

    Director of Football Operations Kevin Colbert talks about rebounding from a 9-7 season.

    Q. During interviews since the end of the 2009 season, Steelers President Art Rooney II has said that perhaps the younger players aren’t being developed quickly enough. Do you agree with that?

    A. You always want to see the young players have their opportunities. It varies when they get those opportunities, and it’s up to the player to force the coaches’ hands. Mike Wallace, a young player, he forced his opportunity by his play. Ziggy Hood, over time, played his way into a pretty significant role down the stretch. Different opportunities will come at different times, but to me, it’s up to the player to stand out enough to warrant the playing time.

    Q. Do you buy into the notion that teams need to spend some high draft picks on offensive linemen?

    A. It depends on the draft. Every draft is different. You never go into a draft saying you have to pick a player at a certain position. Our left tackle is a third-round pick, the left guard is a No. 6, the center was an undrafted rookie, the right guard a No. 3 pick and the right tackle a fourth-round pick. And we won (Super Bowl XLIII) with that group. You want high picks in every group, but that’s not going to happen, especially when you’re picking later as we have in the recent past.

    Q. Mike Tomlin has been the coach during a good year, during a great season and a most recently during disappointing season. Has he changed as a coach at all during that time?

    A. I haven’t seen any change. We’re going to have these (disappointing) seasons, and we all have to respond. It’s how the organization is going to respond after finishing 9-7. Coach Tomlin, in my opinion has been the same throughout. It’s the players who change, the team that changes.

    Q. Are there any specific depth areas that concern you? Cornerback?

    A. No. Not one more than others. When you look at your team, 9-7, you can add depth anywhere, add competition anywhere. It might be competition for the starting spot, backup spot or practice squad.

    Q. You want to be better everywhere on the roster, but are there any areas you can identify as not being good enough?

    A. No. What I can identify is that 9-7 is not good enough, and that’s a collective. Offense, defense, coaching, personnel, everything. To sit here and say a certain position or a certain group, no. You have to look at it collectively, because one area intertwines with another.

    Q. Did you sign Adam Graessle because he’s a punter with some kickoff ability?

    A. That’s a nice quality to have, because when you’re getting down to 80 players for camp, sometimes those versatilities and extra abilities might save you a roster spot.

    Q. This team has been willing to devote a roster spot for a return specialist, but it never has done so for a kickoff specialist. Do you not believe in a guy for kickoffs?

    A. I would think we would be open to anything that would improve the team, but at what cost? If you’re talking about a kickoff specialist vs. a return specialist vs. a fourth receiver vs. a fifth cornerback, you have to figure out what the best formula is for a winning team.

    Q. Does a player’s ability on special teams become more important in your free agency evaluations based on the performance of the coverage units last season?

    A. Anybody who can do something beyond their play on offense or defense certainly would enhance their chance to help you. Sometimes the better kids in college don’t play a lot of special teams, but that doesn’t mean they can’t.

    Q. Is it harder to identify them as potential contributors on special teams then?

    A. You try to get their history, and you try to know what they have done in the past. Then you have to find out their willingness to do it in the future. Sometimes when kids become better players, they don’t see themselves as special teams contributors, while others see their chance to play comes through special teams. You hope to get players with that latter mind-set.

    Q. How would you rate the quality of the 2010 draft?

    A. Excellent. It’s very deep defensively. Offensively, there might not be as many big name skill position players, but there are a lot of good players.

    Q. Is it another good year for offensive tackles?

    A. Yes. It all goes back to the evolution of the passing game in college football, which trickles into the NFL. If you’re to ask me why (it’s another good year for offensive tackles in the draft), I’d say colleges are developing more offensive linemen, particularly pass protectors, which are usually the left tackle types.

    Q. Has that trickled down to defense yet? Have colleges started turning out better coverage guys because they have to defend all of those passing offenses?

    A. There need to be more cover players, and there are more pass-rushers – those “undersized” pass rushers, who probably are linebacker types for us. It’s also un unusually deep draft for defensive linemen as well. It was unusually deep (with defensive linemen) before the underclassmen declared, and then that just enhanced it.

    Q. There have been suggestions over the years that Willie Colon should be a guard. Do you agree with that?

    A. That’s a coaching decision. Sometimes it’s easy to say he could move inside and be a great player, but you don’t know that until you actually do it. With Jeff Hartings, we always talked about him being a good center, but he never played center in Detroit. When he came here he went to center and played pretty well. You may think a guy has certain abilities, but until you see him do it nobody knows for sure. And when a guy is pretty good at one position, it’s hard to move a guy, because then you’re making two moves.

    Q. At one point of 2009, the Steelers were 6-2, and then they also won their last three games of the season. That’s 9-2. How did the season get away during that five-game losing streak?

    A. You’re 6-2 at the halfway point, and you feel pretty good. You lose a game, and then you lose another game, and it seemed like it was hard to stop that trend. To Coach Tomlin’s credit, and the team’s credit, after that disappointing spell they were able to come back and we finished on a high note. I think that’s very important as a springboard going into the next season. Again, collectively we weren’t good enough to win games during that five-game stretch. We’re a 9-7 team, and part of that 9-7 was losing five. The five-game losing streak was disappointing, but you have to look at how we finished. How we finished wasn’t good enough to get us into the tournament, but at least we finished on a high not. We’ll see if we carry it over.

    Q. Are you in the last year of your contract, and where are you on that?

    A. My personal status, I’m not going to talk about that. It’s not for me to discuss.

    Q. Do you want to stay here?

    A. I’m totally happy in my position at this point.

    Q. The Steelers have the 18th overall pick in the 2010 draft. If you stay in that spot, are you confident you’ll get a quality player?

    A. Yes. Absolutely. Not yet knowing the medical and character information we’ll find out over the next two months, it looks like we can get deep into this thing and find players who can help improve a 9-7 team.
    ​2019 MNFE CHAMPION
  • MeetJoeGreene
    Hall of Famer
    • May 2008
    • 3221

    #2
    Re: Q & A: Colbert on the '10 Draft

    He said a whole bunch of nuthin' in that.
    Cleveland spelled backwards is DNA Level C
    http://i225.photobucket.com/albums/d...itty29/mjg.jpg
    another AA/AS original.

    Comment

    • steelerkeylargo
      Hall of Famer
      • Mar 2009
      • 2507

      #3
      Re: Q & A: Colbert on the '10 Draft

      What did you want him to do? Name his top 3 guys at each position?






      Comment

      • phillyesq
        Legend
        • May 2008
        • 7568

        #4
        Re: Q & A: Colbert on the '10 Draft

        Originally posted by MeetJoeGreene
        He said a whole bunch of nuthin' in that.
        Yup, he did, as he should.

        I liked his comments that it is up to young players to earn their way onto the field. It is also encouraging to see him say that this draft is deep on defense. For once, the available draft class may match up well with the Steelers needs.

        Comment

        • Shawn
          Legend
          • Mar 2008
          • 15131

          #5
          Re: Q & A: Colbert on the '10 Draft

          Originally posted by steelerkeylargo
          What did you want him to do? Name his top 3 guys at each position?
          Yes

          That would really help me nail down my mock.
          Trolls are people too.

          Comment

          • steelerkeylargo
            Hall of Famer
            • Mar 2009
            • 2507

            #6
            Re: Q & A: Colbert on the '10 Draft

            Originally posted by Shawn
            Originally posted by steelerkeylargo
            What did you want him to do? Name his top 3 guys at each position?
            Yes

            That would really help me nail down my mock.

            Well it looks like you need some help if you think Ben Tate will last till the 6th round.






            Comment

            • Mister Pittsburgh
              Hall of Famer
              • Jul 2008
              • 3674

              #7
              Re: Q & A: Colbert on the '10 Draft

              Originally posted by phillyesq
              Originally posted by MeetJoeGreene
              He said a whole bunch of nuthin' in that.
              Yup, he did, as he should.

              I liked his comments that it is up to young players to earn their way onto the field. It is also encouraging to see him say that this draft is deep on defense. For once, the available draft class may match up well with the Steelers needs.
              Q. During interviews since the end of the 2009 season, Steelers President Art Rooney II has said that perhaps the younger players aren’t being developed quickly enough. Do you agree with that?

              A. You always want to see the young players have their opportunities. It varies when they get those opportunities, and it’s up to the player to force the coaches’ hands. Mike Wallace, a young player, he forced his opportunity by his play. Ziggy Hood, over time, played his way into a pretty significant role down the stretch. Different opportunities will come at different times, but to me, it’s up to the player to stand out enough to warrant the playing time.


              He didn't even answer the question that was asked. How does 'aren't being developed quickly enough' equate into an answer regarding getting playing time? Maybe they aren't forcing their way onto the field because they aren't getting coached up well enough. When you have a 33 year old backup getting torched cause he is too slow yet he is the guy you play and yet you have younger, faster, more athletic players in the wings, then I say they aren't prepared well enough.
              @_Hellgrammite

              Comment

              • Mister Pittsburgh
                Hall of Famer
                • Jul 2008
                • 3674

                #8
                Re: Q & A: Colbert on the '10 Draft

                This is another question he gave a stupid answer to that could of been answered. If he is serious in that answer then I say it is because we need depth at a lot of positions which doesn't exactly speak well of the job he has done replenishing the depth chart. When you finish 9-7 and out of the playoffs, I think you might want to look for more than just 'depth'....the starters are the ones that went 9-7 and out of the playoffs. How does having better backups that will take a year or two to step on the field fix 9-7?

                Q. Are there any specific depth areas that concern you? Cornerback?

                A. No. Not one more than others. When you look at your team, 9-7, you can add depth anywhere, add competition anywhere. It might be competition for the starting spot, backup spot or practice squad.
                @_Hellgrammite

                Comment

                • Sugar
                  Hall of Famer
                  • Oct 2008
                  • 3700

                  #9
                  Re: Q & A: Colbert on the '10 Draft

                  Originally posted by Mister Pittsburgh
                  This is another question he gave a stupid answer to that could of been answered. If he is serious in that answer then I say it is because we need depth at a lot of positions which doesn't exactly speak well of the job he has done replenishing the depth chart. When you finish 9-7 and out of the playoffs, I think you might want to look for more than just 'depth'....the starters are the ones that went 9-7 and out of the playoffs. How does having better backups that will take a year or two to step on the field fix 9-7?

                  Q. Are there any specific depth areas that concern you? Cornerback?

                  A. No. Not one more than others. When you look at your team, 9-7, you can add depth anywhere, add competition anywhere. It might be competition for the starting spot, backup spot or practice squad.
                  When you lose so many games in the 4th quarter it can easily be because you don't have quality backups. Starters can get you so far, but you need good backups to finish strong.

                  Comment

                  • Mister Pittsburgh
                    Hall of Famer
                    • Jul 2008
                    • 3674

                    #10
                    Re: Q & A: Colbert on the '10 Draft

                    Originally posted by Sugar
                    Originally posted by Mister Pittsburgh
                    This is another question he gave a stupid answer to that could of been answered. If he is serious in that answer then I say it is because we need depth at a lot of positions which doesn't exactly speak well of the job he has done replenishing the depth chart. When you finish 9-7 and out of the playoffs, I think you might want to look for more than just 'depth'....the starters are the ones that went 9-7 and out of the playoffs. How does having better backups that will take a year or two to step on the field fix 9-7?

                    Q. Are there any specific depth areas that concern you? Cornerback?

                    A. No. Not one more than others. When you look at your team, 9-7, you can add depth anywhere, add competition anywhere. It might be competition for the starting spot, backup spot or practice squad.
                    When you lose so many games in the 4th quarter it can easily be because you don't have quality backups. Starters can get you so far, but you need good backups to finish strong.
                    When is the last time in an NFL game you saw CB's pulled for their backups cause they were tired? I have never seen a CB rotation. Only way you can use that argument is with Troy and having Ty Carter as his backup. Although, I think Ty Carter woudl have been the backup no matter what with DL's love of veterans over coaching up youth.
                    @_Hellgrammite

                    Comment

                    • stlrz d
                      Legend
                      • May 2008
                      • 9244

                      #11
                      Re: Q & A: Colbert on the '10 Draft

                      [quote=Mister Pittsburgh]
                      Originally posted by Sugar
                      Originally posted by "Mister Pittsburgh":294ayqeh
                      This is another question he gave a stupid answer to that could of been answered. If he is serious in that answer then I say it is because we need depth at a lot of positions which doesn't exactly speak well of the job he has done replenishing the depth chart. When you finish 9-7 and out of the playoffs, I think you might want to look for more than just 'depth'....the starters are the ones that went 9-7 and out of the playoffs. How does having better backups that will take a year or two to step on the field fix 9-7?

                      Q. Are there any specific depth areas that concern you? Cornerback?

                      A. No. Not one more than others. When you look at your team, 9-7, you can add depth anywhere, add competition anywhere. It might be competition for the starting spot, backup spot or practice squad.
                      When you lose so many games in the 4th quarter it can easily be because you don't have quality backups. Starters can get you so far, but you need good backups to finish strong.
                      When is the last time in an NFL game you saw CB's pulled for their backups cause they were tired? I have never seen a CB rotation. Only way you can use that argument is with Troy and having Ty Carter as his backup. Although, I think Ty Carter woudl have been the backup no matter what with DL's love of veterans over coaching up youth.[/quote:294ayqeh]

                      There are 4 safties on the roster.

                      Troy, Clark, Carter, Mundy.

                      Who should have played instead of Carter?

                      Comment

                      • Northern_Blitz
                        Legend
                        • Dec 2008
                        • 24373

                        #12
                        Re: Q & A: Colbert on the '10 Draft

                        [quote=stlrz d][quote="Mister Pittsburgh":14c1j9uk]
                        Originally posted by Sugar
                        Originally posted by "Mister Pittsburgh":14c1j9uk
                        This is another question he gave a stupid answer to that could of been answered. If he is serious in that answer then I say it is because we need depth at a lot of positions which doesn't exactly speak well of the job he has done replenishing the depth chart. When you finish 9-7 and out of the playoffs, I think you might want to look for more than just 'depth'....the starters are the ones that went 9-7 and out of the playoffs. How does having better backups that will take a year or two to step on the field fix 9-7?

                        Q. Are there any specific depth areas that concern you? Cornerback?

                        A. No. Not one more than others. When you look at your team, 9-7, you can add depth anywhere, add competition anywhere. It might be competition for the starting spot, backup spot or practice squad.
                        When you lose so many games in the 4th quarter it can easily be because you don't have quality backups. Starters can get you so far, but you need good backups to finish strong.
                        When is the last time in an NFL game you saw CB's pulled for their backups cause they were tired? I have never seen a CB rotation. Only way you can use that argument is with Troy and having Ty Carter as his backup. Although, I think Ty Carter woudl have been the backup no matter what with DL's love of veterans over coaching up youth.[/quote:14c1j9uk]

                        There are 4 safties on the roster.

                        Troy, Clark, Carter, Mundy.

                        Who should have played instead of Carter?[/quote:14c1j9uk]


                        No, you're not allowed to bring up facts while bashing coaches. Just like Gay, Carter was the best we had. In Gay's case, when we tried to give a youger guy an opportunity, he dropped an INT that cost us the game. But it's DL's fault for not "coaching up" young players.

                        Comment

                        • NJ-STEELER
                          Legend
                          • May 2008
                          • 12563

                          #13
                          Re: Q & A: Colbert on the '10 Draft

                          Originally posted by phillyesq
                          Originally posted by MeetJoeGreene
                          He said a whole bunch of nuthin' in that.
                          Yup, he did, as he should.

                          I liked his comments that it is up to young players to earn their way onto the field. It is also encouraging to see him say that this draft is deep on defense. For once, the available draft class may match up well with the Steelers needs.
                          good point

                          seems like our needs are always what the draft is weak in

                          Comment

                          • NJ-STEELER
                            Legend
                            • May 2008
                            • 12563

                            #14
                            Re: Q & A: Colbert on the '10 Draft

                            Originally posted by phillyesq
                            Originally posted by MeetJoeGreene
                            He said a whole bunch of nuthin' in that.
                            Yup, he did, as he should.

                            I liked his comments that it is up to young players to earn their way onto the field. It is also encouraging to see him say that this draft is deep on defense. For once, the available draft class may match up well with the Steelers needs.
                            good point

                            seems like our needs are always what the draft is weak in

                            Comment

                            • Oviedo
                              Legend
                              • May 2008
                              • 23824

                              #15
                              Re: Q & A: Colbert on the '10 Draft

                              Two things I see "reading between the lines":

                              1. Don't expect an offensive lineman in round 1. He goes out of his way to point out that they won a Super Bowl with an OL that has no Round 1 picks. Just doesn't seem to be the type of position he likes to take in Round 1. Right or wrong that just seems to be the way it is.

                              2. Don't be surprised if the Round 1 pick IS NOT a defensive back. He has a bigger picture view that all areas can be improved he will not panic and react likes fans do and will look at the best value for the #18 pick based on who they have on their board. This tells me that we should not be surprised if the pick is: LB, DL, RB, WR or even a TE if that is who they have rated best. While the play of the defensive backfield was possibly the most glaring deficiency, don't kid ourselves that our DL and LB (especially Farrior) played lights out all season long or that we have the depth we need at a position like TE if Heath were to ever go down or at WR if Hines would get hurt or in the LB corps if one of the starters were to go down.
                              "My team, may they always be right, but right or wrong...MY TEAM!"

                              Comment

                              Working...