Re: LeBeau dreams up a new defensive package...
The point you are all missing is how hard it is getting to restock the 3-4 defense. You have a major problem at NT starting next season. This last draft showed how few true 3-4 NTs there are and now you have 12 3-4 teams all wanting the same type of players. You also have the issue of the time it takes to convert player to 3-4 OLBs from college DE.
Remember that we effectively have to ignore a significant part of the college defensive line talent pool that comes out every year because of the unique requirements we have for 3-4 DEs who played DT in college and college DEs that can convert to OLB. Not sure that can continue indefinitely as more and more teams switch to the 3-4 and want the same types of players.
As far as depth on the DL I think it is better than many may think. Remember that the only guy who really doesn't fit is Hampton and he is likely gone after this season. Kiesel would be a very good 4-3 DE as would Woodley. Bruce Davis is a natural 4-3 DE who could rotate to both sides to spell Woodley and Kiesel. Hood and Smith could play DT and Hoke could probably rotate in with them. You are really about 2 players short of a good game day rotation and have not yet factored in Eason, Kirschke, and the rookie Harris (natural 4-3 DT) plus you have Paxson and Clements on the practice squad both of whom are natural 4-3 DTs.
I have no idea whether they would every change and really don't care as long as they remain a top 3 defense. I just bring it up because it is thought provoking and a good off season topic because so much of the other stuff is boring. I would just caution never say never. Not because of our defense slipping but because it all goes back to the talent pool you have to draw from and how many times you can fish the same pond without all the big fish being gone. When you are the only guy there it is much better than 12 other people showing up and fishing the same pond.
The point you are all missing is how hard it is getting to restock the 3-4 defense. You have a major problem at NT starting next season. This last draft showed how few true 3-4 NTs there are and now you have 12 3-4 teams all wanting the same type of players. You also have the issue of the time it takes to convert player to 3-4 OLBs from college DE.
Remember that we effectively have to ignore a significant part of the college defensive line talent pool that comes out every year because of the unique requirements we have for 3-4 DEs who played DT in college and college DEs that can convert to OLB. Not sure that can continue indefinitely as more and more teams switch to the 3-4 and want the same types of players.
As far as depth on the DL I think it is better than many may think. Remember that the only guy who really doesn't fit is Hampton and he is likely gone after this season. Kiesel would be a very good 4-3 DE as would Woodley. Bruce Davis is a natural 4-3 DE who could rotate to both sides to spell Woodley and Kiesel. Hood and Smith could play DT and Hoke could probably rotate in with them. You are really about 2 players short of a good game day rotation and have not yet factored in Eason, Kirschke, and the rookie Harris (natural 4-3 DT) plus you have Paxson and Clements on the practice squad both of whom are natural 4-3 DTs.
I have no idea whether they would every change and really don't care as long as they remain a top 3 defense. I just bring it up because it is thought provoking and a good off season topic because so much of the other stuff is boring. I would just caution never say never. Not because of our defense slipping but because it all goes back to the talent pool you have to draw from and how many times you can fish the same pond without all the big fish being gone. When you are the only guy there it is much better than 12 other people showing up and fishing the same pond.
Comment