Idea from another board but my re-rankings post draft:
QB; is Wilson better than Watson at this point?
RB is a tough one because 3 teams have lead horse so I think you have to consider the depth at the position. But you also have to factor in LJ as a runner as well. So BAL gets the edge there.
To rank the teams I simply multiplied the number of times each team appeared in each column by the column #. So higher total points equals lower ranking.
Somehow CIN in 4th place doesn't seem quite right but there it is.
Tell me where I'm wrong....
#1 | #2 | #3 | #4 | ||
QB | CIN | BAL | PIT | CLE | |
RB | BAL | PIT | CLE | CIN | |
WR | CIN | CLE | PIT | BAL | |
TE | BAL | CLE | PIT | CIN | |
OL | CLE | PIT | BAL | CIN | |
DL | BAL | CLE | PIT | CIN | |
Edge | PIT | CLE | CIN | BAL | |
LB | BAL | PIT | CLE | CIN | |
CB | BAL | CLE | CIN | PIT | |
Safety | BAL | PIT | CIN | CLE | |
RankTotals | |||||
BAL | 6 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 19 |
PIT | 1 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 25 |
CLE | 1 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 25 |
CIN | 2 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 31 |
QB; is Wilson better than Watson at this point?
RB is a tough one because 3 teams have lead horse so I think you have to consider the depth at the position. But you also have to factor in LJ as a runner as well. So BAL gets the edge there.
To rank the teams I simply multiplied the number of times each team appeared in each column by the column #. So higher total points equals lower ranking.
Somehow CIN in 4th place doesn't seem quite right but there it is.
Tell me where I'm wrong....

Comment