AFCN Postional Rankings

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • NorthCoast
    Legend
    • Sep 2008
    • 26626

    AFCN Postional Rankings

    Idea from another board but my re-rankings post draft:

    #1 #2 #3 #4
    QB CIN BAL PIT CLE
    RB BAL PIT CLE CIN
    WR CIN CLE PIT BAL
    TE BAL CLE PIT CIN
    OL CLE PIT BAL CIN
    DL BAL CLE PIT CIN
    Edge PIT CLE CIN BAL
    LB BAL PIT CLE CIN
    CB BAL CLE CIN PIT
    Safety BAL PIT CIN CLE
    RankTotals
    BAL 6 1 1 2 19
    PIT 1 4 4 1 25
    CLE 1 5 2 2 25
    CIN 2 0 3 5 31

    QB; is Wilson better than Watson at this point?

    RB is a tough one because 3 teams have lead horse so I think you have to consider the depth at the position. But you also have to factor in LJ as a runner as well. So BAL gets the edge there.

    To rank the teams I simply multiplied the number of times each team appeared in each column by the column #. So higher total points equals lower ranking.

    Somehow CIN in 4th place doesn't seem quite right but there it is.

    Tell me where I'm wrong....
  • WindyCitySteel
    Legend
    • Nov 2011
    • 15675

    #2
    Good stuff, but if you weighted positions of importance I wonder how it would look.

    Comment

    • NorthCoast
      Legend
      • Sep 2008
      • 26626

      #3
      Originally posted by WindyCitySteel
      Good stuff, but if you weighted positions of importance I wonder how it would look.
      Somewhat related; in an interview with Jim Harbaugh they asked him why he didn't target a top offensive weapon in the draft for Herbert. His answer; "we consider OL to be an offensive weapon".

      Comment

      Working...