Last night's box score

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • whisper
    Legend
    • Mar 2020
    • 9423

    Last night's box score

    What jumps out at you?

    Nice rushing stats ah? Horrid, horrid OL play.
  • Northern_Blitz
    Legend
    • Dec 2008
    • 23901

    #2
    Originally posted by whisper
    What jumps out at you?

    Nice rushing stats ah? Horrid, horrid OL play.
    The line that jumps out the most is KP's.

    The OL play was kind of scary.

    Bush had 4 tackles though. So that's something I guess.

    Comment

    • Chucktownsteeler
      Legend
      • May 2008
      • 6714

      #3
      Claypool made a catch without falling down.
      Help me find my post proving I am a Yinzer!

      I will tip my hat to Tomlin if he has a winning record and the team makes the play-offs in the upcoming season.

      Comment

      • NorthCoast
        Legend
        • Sep 2008
        • 26099

        #4
        Originally posted by Chucktownsteeler
        Claypool made a catch without falling down.
        His first catch was not exactly textbook. He jumped off the ground when I don't think he really needed to. He also caught it with his body rather than his hands. I wonder if he needs glasses?

        Comment

        • SteelerOfDeVille
          Legend
          • May 2008
          • 9065

          #5
          Originally posted by Northern_Blitz
          Bush had 4 tackles though. So that's something I guess.
          I honestly felt like i saw baby steps in the right direction. I still want him replaced next year, but he did seem to flow and make the right reads - but still took too long to disengage if someone got their hands on him
          2013 MNF Executive Champion!

          Comment

          • whisper
            Legend
            • Mar 2020
            • 9423

            #6
            I forgot to actually include the box score. Doh!



            Those rushing #s aren't gonna win any games, they are pathetic. Harris can't be the all end-all answer to that crap fest OL performance. No way. He's gonna be ground to a nub in no time.
            Last edited by whisper; 08-22-2022, 12:38 PM.

            Comment

            • Ghost
              Legend
              • May 2008
              • 6231

              #7
              Warren - 3 rushes for 3 yards
              McFarland - 2 rushes for 1 yard
              Snell - 3 rushes for -2 yards

              Officially 14 rush attempts for 24 yards. Take out the MT scramble and the Sims gimmick play and you have 12 rushing attempts for 3 yards.
              sigpic

              Comment

              • whisper
                Legend
                • Mar 2020
                • 9423

                #8
                Originally posted by NorthCoast
                His first catch was not exactly textbook. He jumped off the ground when I don't think he really needed to. He also caught it with his body rather than his hands. I wonder if he needs glasses?
                I've been on the "Claypool needs glasses" bandwagon ever since last year. He doesn't to be able to see the balls coming in to him that well.

                Comment

                • whisper
                  Legend
                  • Mar 2020
                  • 9423

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Ghost
                  Warren - 3 rushes for 3 yards
                  McFarland - 2 rushes for 1 yard
                  Snell - 3 rushes for -2 yards

                  Officially 14 rush attempts for 24 yards. Take out the MT scramble and the Sims gimmick play and you have 12 rushing attempts for 3 yards.
                  Yes, I was also going to mention the Sims gimmick play and MT scramble, but even when you include them in the rushing stats they are STILL beyond anemic. This isn't going to get it done. 2022 is starting to look scary, with Pickett looking good or not. That OL is a stack of hot, steaming sh-t. It doesn't just look like "one of the worst" OLs in the league, it looks like the very most rubbish of all OLs.

                  They saw what we saw last season, how did they fail this miserably at addressing it?

                  Comment

                  • feltdizz
                    Legend
                    • May 2008
                    • 27135

                    #10
                    Originally posted by whisper
                    Yes, I was also going to mention the Sims gimmick play and MT scramble, but even when you include them in the rushing stats they are STILL beyond anemic. This isn't going to get it done. 2022 is starting to look scary, with Pickett looking good or not. That OL is a stack of hot, steaming sh-t. It doesn't just look like "one of the worst" OLs in the league, it looks like the very most rubbish of all OLs.

                    They saw what we saw last season, how did they fail this miserably at addressing it?
                    They chose Pickett and Pickens and Leal over OL.
                    Steelers 27
                    Rats 16

                    Comment

                    • Northern_Blitz
                      Legend
                      • Dec 2008
                      • 23901

                      #11
                      Originally posted by SteelerOfDeVille
                      I honestly felt like i saw baby steps in the right direction. I still want him replaced next year, but he did seem to flow and make the right reads - but still took too long to disengage if someone got their hands on him
                      It seems like this is who he is.

                      Comment

                      • Northern_Blitz
                        Legend
                        • Dec 2008
                        • 23901

                        #12
                        Originally posted by whisper
                        I forgot to actually include the box score. Doh!



                        Those rushing #s aren't gonna win any games, they are pathetic. Harris can't be the all end-all answer to that crap fest OL performance. No way. He's gonna be ground to a nub in no time.
                        It's probably worth remembering that the rushing looked pretty good in game 1.

                        Hopefully they can get back to looking more like that.

                        Comment

                        • whisper
                          Legend
                          • Mar 2020
                          • 9423

                          #13
                          Originally posted by SteelerOfDeVille
                          I honestly felt like i saw baby steps in the right direction. I still want him replaced next year, but he did seem to flow and make the right reads - but still took too long to disengage if someone got their hands on him
                          Didn't I see a RB "erase" him on one play?

                          Comment

                          • Ghost
                            Legend
                            • May 2008
                            • 6231

                            #14
                            Originally posted by whisper
                            Didn't I see a RB "erase" him on one play?
                            Hopefully it gets better, but as of now, the Steelers are essentially playing with 10 men on the field when Bush is out there. There are plays where it looks as if he doesn't enjoy playing the game.
                            sigpic

                            Comment

                            • whisper
                              Legend
                              • Mar 2020
                              • 9423

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Northern_Blitz
                              It's probably worth remembering that the rushing looked pretty good in game 1.

                              Hopefully they can get back to looking more like that.
                              It could come down to the Hawks being anemic upfront and the Jags being pretty stout. But all I know, in this game, the OL got zero push on the D, RBs were being hit 2 yards behind the LOS. You will never win many games with that going on.

                              Comment

                              Working...