Potential RB camp cuts who could land with the Steelers

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Captain Lemming
    Legend
    • Jun 2008
    • 16063

    #16
    Originally posted by whisper
    The original #s I saw said he was 185. That WAS and STILL is light for a successful NFL RB. A lot of the guys you list were closer to 200 LBs than 185. Emmitt, Thurman, etc. were 200 LBs. And being short is not a disadvantage. Being too small is, big difference. Barry Sanders, Ray Rice, MJD were all short. It didn't hurt them. Now you want a RB too small to produce? How about that "little person" we drafted a few years ago? Dri Archer.
    Make Google your friend. There are dozens of sites that list him between 194 and 196.

    I have yet to see where you got 185.

    Going from 195 to solid 210 at his height and at that age ain't all that hard.

    With no school and training as his job, he could be an his way already.
    sigpic



    In view of the fact that Mike Tomlin has matched Cowhers record I give him the designation:

    TCFCLTC-
    The Coach Formerly Considered Less Than Cowher

    Comment

    • Bawb the Revelator
      Pro Bowler
      • Jan 2022
      • 1975

      #17
      Originally posted by Captain Lemming
      Make Google your friend. There are dozens of sites that list him between 194 and 196.

      I have yet to see where you got 185.

      Going from 195 to solid 210 at his height and at that age ain't all that hard.

      With no school and training as his job, he could be an his way already.
      Google = Good. No Google = Bad.
      [Simplifying Captain Lemming's posts until LaTrobe opens ]

      Comment

      Working...