I think a numbers geek GM who focuses on team building financials might be a perfect compliment to a coach who leans a little much on emotion and sentiment. Both Colbert and Tomlin are loyal to a fault.
Team building is about more than talent evaluation.
What positions you chose to invest big dollars to make the greatest impact in is huge.
I have said FOR YEARS investing big coin in backs and receivers is a terrible way to spend finite resources.
They are flashy stars, but buying expensive ones dont win you championships.
I've shown on many occasions that elite secondary players are undervalued.
Managing what positions to invest more in using succes NUMBERS to measure the value of spend is something we can do better.
And we need to get past the sentimental desire to pay productive people we draft over similar priced free agents who are at an more valuable position (I wanted Gilmore at the expense of AB before AB got crazy, they got almost the exact same money).
Oline, Dline, every position. What gives the best bang for your buck?
Me? Invest in INTERIOR oline (elite is affordable), pay for average tackles (elite are overpaid and rarely keys to championships.) You literally could buy 3 James Daniel's quality guard/centers for the cost of 1 similar quality tackle. Heck look at how Chuks is paid and he is a lesser player.
Result is you don't have to invest in overpriced backs by paying over market for interior line.
Invest high picks more on overvalued positions like receiver and tackle.
We need to let certain expensive replaceable positions walk during free agency (receivers) and spend that dough elsewhere.
Then don't be scared to invest in an elite lockdown corner.
So I'm very interested in how a numbers guy looks at team building.
It might be a much smarter hire than you think.
Team building is about more than talent evaluation.
What positions you chose to invest big dollars to make the greatest impact in is huge.
I have said FOR YEARS investing big coin in backs and receivers is a terrible way to spend finite resources.
They are flashy stars, but buying expensive ones dont win you championships.
I've shown on many occasions that elite secondary players are undervalued.
Managing what positions to invest more in using succes NUMBERS to measure the value of spend is something we can do better.
And we need to get past the sentimental desire to pay productive people we draft over similar priced free agents who are at an more valuable position (I wanted Gilmore at the expense of AB before AB got crazy, they got almost the exact same money).
Oline, Dline, every position. What gives the best bang for your buck?
Me? Invest in INTERIOR oline (elite is affordable), pay for average tackles (elite are overpaid and rarely keys to championships.) You literally could buy 3 James Daniel's quality guard/centers for the cost of 1 similar quality tackle. Heck look at how Chuks is paid and he is a lesser player.
Result is you don't have to invest in overpriced backs by paying over market for interior line.
Invest high picks more on overvalued positions like receiver and tackle.
We need to let certain expensive replaceable positions walk during free agency (receivers) and spend that dough elsewhere.
Then don't be scared to invest in an elite lockdown corner.
So I'm very interested in how a numbers guy looks at team building.
It might be a much smarter hire than you think.

Comment