Steelers sign Safety

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Chucktownsteeler
    Legend
    • May 2008
    • 6847

    Steelers sign Safety

    Karl Joseph to 1 year deal.
    Help me find my post proving I am a Yinzer!

    I will tip my hat to Tomlin if he has a winning record and the team makes the play-offs in the upcoming season.
  • Buzz
    Legend
    • Dec 2017
    • 8489

    #2
    special teams/backup

    still looking for a starter at SS

    Comment

    • steeler_george
      Hall of Famer
      • Dec 2008
      • 3417

      #3
      I am curious to what the FO is thinking with this move, are they telling us something...

      Do they think that they hit a snag in negotiations with Edmunds, Kazee or any other SS.

      Do they think that they want to kick start the market for SS to get going, signal a message to the SS market that we have a "starter". If you want to sign with us, get moving.

      Do they think that they have a starter caliber SS, in case they miss out on Edmunds, Kazee, or Mathieu?

      Do they think he is good enough to push a 1st round rookie ( Hill, Brisker, Cine, Pietr)

      Comment

      • Northern_Blitz
        Legend
        • Dec 2008
        • 24390

        #4
        Originally posted by steeler_george
        I am curious to what the FO is thinking with this move, are they telling us something...

        Do they think that they hit a snag in negotiations with Edmunds, Kazee or any other SS.

        Do they think that they want to kick start the market for SS to get going, signal a message to the SS market that we have a "starter". If you want to sign with us, get moving.

        Do they think that they have a starter caliber SS, in case they miss out on Edmunds, Kazee, or Mathieu?

        Do they think he is good enough to push a 1st round rookie ( Hill, Brisker, Cine, Pietr)
        I think what this signing means is: we will still have guys on the practice squad this year.

        If we sign someone at SS to start, I don't think Joseph is the guy.

        I think this pretty much has to be 1 year at the minimum...and likely on the PS again.

        Comment

        • whisper
          Legend
          • Mar 2020
          • 9423

          #5
          Originally posted by steeler_george
          I am curious to what the FO is thinking with this move, are they telling us something...

          Do they think that they hit a snag in negotiations with Edmunds, Kazee or any other SS.

          Do they think that they want to kick start the market for SS to get going, signal a message to the SS market that we have a "starter". If you want to sign with us, get moving.

          Do they think that they have a starter caliber SS, in case they miss out on Edmunds, Kazee, or Mathieu?

          Do they think he is good enough to push a 1st round rookie ( Hill, Brisker, Cine, Pietr)
          Ummm, Joseph was washed up 2-3 years ago. Classic CYA move by Colbert. KJ had ONE solo tackle last season; I'm not that signing him sent any kind of message to anyone out there.

          Comment

          • whisper
            Legend
            • Mar 2020
            • 9423

            #6
            Originally posted by Northern_Blitz
            I think what this signing means is: we will still have guys on the practice squad this year.

            If we sign someone at SS to start, I don't think Joseph is the guy.

            I think this pretty much has to be 1 year at the minimum...and likely on the PS again.
            Isn't the PS usually for young guys who they hope to develop into a possible guy on the 53 some day? I didn't think it was really for 10-year vets.

            Comment

            • NorthCoast
              Legend
              • Sep 2008
              • 26643

              #7
              Originally posted by steeler_george
              I am curious to what the FO is thinking with this move, are they telling us something...

              Do they think that they hit a snag in negotiations with Edmunds, Kazee or any other SS.

              Do they think that they want to kick start the market for SS to get going, signal a message to the SS market that we have a "starter". If you want to sign with us, get moving.

              Do they think that they have a starter caliber SS, in case they miss out on Edmunds, Kazee, or Mathieu?

              Do they think he is good enough to push a 1st round rookie ( Hill, Brisker, Cine, Pietr)
              I don't think the Steelers hit any snag with signing one of those guys. It's just that those players think their value is more than when the team thinks. Doesn't seem to be a whole lot different than BAL dealing with LJ. All indications are BAL wants to get the deal done but LJ is the one dragging feet hoping for a higher number.

              Comment

              • steeler_fan_in_t.o.
                Legend
                • May 2008
                • 10301

                #8
                Originally posted by steeler_george
                I am curious to what the FO is thinking with this move, are they telling us something...

                Do they think that they hit a snag in negotiations with Edmunds, Kazee or any other SS.

                Do they think that they want to kick start the market for SS to get going, signal a message to the SS market that we have a "starter". If you want to sign with us, get moving.

                Do they think that they have a starter caliber SS, in case they miss out on Edmunds, Kazee, or Mathieu?

                Do they think he is good enough to push a 1st round rookie ( Hill, Brisker, Cine, Pietr)
                They are telling us that you need backup/ST/PS guys too.
                http://i278.photobucket.com/albums/k...to_Mike/to.jpg

                Comment

                • Northern_Blitz
                  Legend
                  • Dec 2008
                  • 24390

                  #9
                  Originally posted by whisper
                  Isn't the PS usually for young guys who they hope to develop into a possible guy on the 53 some day? I didn't think it was really for 10-year vets.
                  I think the PS rules changed with covid.

                  My understanding is that he was on the PS last year, but I could be wrong. played in 2 games. 2 tackles, 1 PD. Clearly not a signing of someone they think is going to get any playing time.

                  Also 6 years isn't 10 years.
                  Last edited by Northern_Blitz; 04-01-2022, 07:04 PM.

                  Comment

                  • Northern_Blitz
                    Legend
                    • Dec 2008
                    • 24390

                    #10
                    Originally posted by steeler_fan_in_t.o.
                    They are telling us that you need backup/ST/PS guys too.
                    And maybe not even that.

                    If it's vet min with no signing bonus, it only means that they're willing to let him come to camp.

                    Even with a small signing bonus it's not painful to cut him.

                    Comment

                    Working...