PFF gave just Najee and the Steelers their Pin-It-On-The-Wall motivation for 2022 :)(

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bawb the Revelator
    Pro Bowler
    • Jan 2022
    • 1975

    PFF gave just Najee and the Steelers their Pin-It-On-The-Wall motivation for 2022 :)(

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5joDLzKekXg Face it - these NFL Lifers "know" about 5% more than any of us with actual real lives. I DON'T count myself among the best of us as an easily destructible 83 year old Bozo on the Bus. But even I "GET" that the Steeler FO already strengthened the OL and plugged obvious holes BEFORE the 2022 NFL Draft happens. So I'm clueless as to who the FO drafts first or signs afterward. I'm actually proud to have a very active Real Life. Cheers an' 'at
    Last edited by Bawb the Revelator; 03-30-2022, 09:13 PM.
  • Bawb the Revelator
    Pro Bowler
    • Jan 2022
    • 1975

    #2
    Originally posted by Bawb the Revelator
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5joDLzKekXg Face it - these NFL Lifers "know" about 5% more than any of us with actual real lives. I DON'T count myself among the best of us as an easily destructible 83 year old Bozo on the Bus. But even I "GET" that the Steeler FO already strengthened the OL and plugged obvious holes BEFORE the 2022 NFL Draft happens. So I'm clueless as to who the FO drafts first or signs afterward. I'm actually proud to have a very active Real Life. Cheers an' 'at
    PEE ESS PLEASE NOTE "an easily destructible 83-y.o. Bozo" should be "an easily DISTRACTED 83-y.o. Bozo."
    I solemnly promise Planet Steelers to post much, much better in the coming years

    Comment

    • Captain Lemming
      Legend
      • Jun 2008
      • 16041

      #3
      Who cares what they say.

      Originally posted by Captain Lemming
      PFF just likes to pretend they are smarter than everyone
      Quoted for relevance
      sigpic



      In view of the fact that Mike Tomlin has matched Cowhers record I give him the designation:

      TCFCLTC-
      The Coach Formerly Considered Less Than Cowher

      Comment

      • Oviedo
        Legend
        • May 2008
        • 23824

        #4
        Originally posted by Captain Lemming
        Who cares what they say.



        Quoted for relevance
        This........
        "My team, may they always be right, but right or wrong...MY TEAM!"

        Comment

        • WindyCitySteel
          Legend
          • Nov 2011
          • 15684

          #5
          If you read the Twitter threads on the subject people are flaming PFF by proving them correct:

          "Well, if they had a better QB and better OL, he would have been a great pick!"

          Yeah, right, genius. That's why it was a bad pick.

          Dopes.

          Comment

          • whisper
            Legend
            • Mar 2020
            • 9423

            #6
            Originally posted by Bawb the Revelator
            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5joDLzKekXg Face it - these NFL Lifers "know" about 5% more than any of us with actual real lives. I DON'T count myself among the best of us as an easily destructible 83 year old Bozo on the Bus. But even I "GET" that the Steeler FO already strengthened the OL and plugged obvious holes BEFORE the 2022 NFL Draft happens. So I'm clueless as to who the FO drafts first or signs afterward. I'm actually proud to have a very active Real Life. Cheers an' 'at
            Bawb, it's too early to say who had the worst 1st round pick of 2021, but my guess is it wasn't Pgh, that's for sure. Now, if only the boys can add a decent #2 RB, preferably a speed back, so we don't have to "run the wheels off" Harris, but who am I kidding? Tomlin actually brags about doing that. (He tends to brag about somethings that are not actually that smart.)

            Comment

            • Northern_Blitz
              Legend
              • Dec 2008
              • 24373

              #7
              He's 100% correct that Harris isn't the only RB taken in the 1st.

              And since the other RB taken in the 1st didn't play in his 1st year, it's hard to take the argument that "Najee is the worst pick in the 1st because he's a RB" seriously.

              Because even if you buy that logic, he'd only be the 2nd worst pick in the 1st.

              I wasn't thrilled about a RB in the first but (1) I think that Najee is a good player and seems to be a good person too; and (2) the nice thing about a 1st round RB is that you can use the 5th year option before tagging twice so you get 7 years without having to make an expensive long term commitment.

              I think it's not unreasonable to think that Najee was the BPA on our board when we picked. But I was hoping that one of the tackles would fall.

              This is similar to our 2nd round pick (which I wasn't a big fan of). I wanted the C when we took the TE. But PF looks like a good player, so it's not like the pick was some colossal failure (even though like many I thought CH was a better pick in real time).

              Comment

              • SteelerOfDeVille
                Legend
                • May 2008
                • 9069

                #8
                Originally posted by Northern_Blitz
                I wasn't thrilled about a RB in the first but (1) I think that Najee is a good player and seems to be a good person too; and (2) the nice thing about a 1st round RB is that you can use the 5th year option before tagging twice so you get 7 years without having to make an expensive long term commitment.

                I think it's not unreasonable to think that Najee was the BPA on our board when we picked. But I was hoping that one of the tackles would fall.
                I agree 100% with this part.

                I'd have been curious to have seen what would have happened if Darrisaw (one pick before) was still on the board. I would have had a harder time accepting Najee as the selection at that point.
                2013 MNF Executive Champion!

                Comment

                • flippy
                  Legend
                  • Dec 2008
                  • 17088

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Northern_Blitz
                  He's 100% correct that Harris isn't the only RB taken in the 1st.

                  And since the other RB taken in the 1st didn't play in his 1st year, it's hard to take the argument that "Najee is the worst pick in the 1st because he's a RB" seriously.

                  Because even if you buy that logic, he'd only be the 2nd worst pick in the 1st.

                  I wasn't thrilled about a RB in the first but (1) I think that Najee is a good player and seems to be a good person too; and (2) the nice thing about a 1st round RB is that you can use the 5th year option before tagging twice so you get 7 years without having to make an expensive long term commitment.

                  I think it's not unreasonable to think that Najee was the BPA on our board when we picked. But I was hoping that one of the tackles would fall.

                  This is similar to our 2nd round pick (which I wasn't a big fan of). I wanted the C when we took the TE. But PF looks like a good player, so it's not like the pick was some colossal failure (even though like many I thought CH was a better pick in real time).
                  In retrospect, these picks will look better in time. NH and PF were some of the best on the board at that time. And if we keep getting the best on the board, we’ll eventually have a better team.

                  It’s not like the other picks some may have wanted would have gotten us to the SuperBowl either.

                  I get the instant reaction, but then in time things always seem to level out.
                  sigpic

                  Comment

                  • Steel Maniac
                    Banned
                    • Apr 2017
                    • 19472

                    #10
                    Originally posted by flippy
                    In retrospect, these picks will look better in time. NH and PF were some of the best on the board at that time. And if we keep getting the best on the board, we’ll eventually have a better team.

                    It’s not like the other picks some may have wanted would have gotten us to the SuperBowl either.

                    I get the instant reaction, but then in time things always seem to level out.
                    totally agree flippy. When that O-line is upgraded, watch out!!

                    Comment

                    • hawaiiansteel
                      Legend
                      • May 2008
                      • 35649

                      #11
                      Originally posted by SteelerOfDeVille
                      I agree 100% with this part.

                      I'd have been curious to have seen what would have happened if Darrisaw (one pick before) was still on the board. I would have had a harder time accepting Najee as the selection at that point.
                      once Darrisaw went off the board, there were no other 1st round worthy OTs left so Najee made sense.

                      glad we didn't reach for one...

                      Comment

                      • feltdizz
                        Legend
                        • May 2008
                        • 27531

                        #12
                        We aren’t drafting for 1 year of service. Once we get the QB and OL figured out I think we will see why PF and Najee were great picks.
                        Steelers 27
                        Rats 16

                        Comment

                        • Northern_Blitz
                          Legend
                          • Dec 2008
                          • 24373

                          #13
                          Originally posted by feltdizz
                          We aren’t drafting for 1 year of service. Once we get the QB and OL figured out I think we will see why PF and Najee were great picks.
                          This is the potential downside of a RB in the 1st.

                          While it isn't as low as 1 year of service. It probably isn't much more than 5 (vs. a QB or OL who generally play for much longer if they are also good).

                          It's more of a "last piece" kind of position to draft.

                          Although maybe drafting a RB is a "1st" and "last" piece you draft?
                          1. Draft the RB first so you have a good running game when you bring in the next QB to make their life easier.
                          2. If that QB is a franchise guy, by the time the RB is up for a new contract, you can let him go and bring in a new rookie RB.

                          Comment

                          • steeler_fan_in_t.o.
                            Legend
                            • May 2008
                            • 10281

                            #14
                            Originally posted by SteelerOfDeVille
                            I agree 100% with this part.

                            I'd have been curious to have seen what would have happened if Darrisaw (one pick before) was still on the board. I would have had a harder time accepting Najee as the selection at that point.
                            Yes to Northern's point and big yes to this point.
                            http://i278.photobucket.com/albums/k...to_Mike/to.jpg

                            Comment

                            • Northern_Blitz
                              Legend
                              • Dec 2008
                              • 24373

                              #15
                              Originally posted by steeler_fan_in_t.o.
                              Yes to Northern's point and big yes to this point.
                              At least we did something about the OL this off season

                              Comment

                              Working...