It's interesting how some folks like to put teams into "cookie cutter" models. Maybe I am guilty of this at times?
For example, better statistical defense vs weaker statistical offense. Games are not won based on fan's perceptions, statistics, rankings, records, or any of those factors.
Games are generally won based on the teams that execute better, make the least amount of mistakes, and can find ways to win on game day.
Ultimately, all that matters is how teams perform on game day. Doesn't matter if the execution is run, pass, or playing quality defense.
Cowboys had their share of opportunities to win vs the Bucs. Cowboys failed to execute enough to win. The Bucs won in crunch time with a little luck ie questionable PI call. Some times teams create their own luck.
For example, better statistical defense vs weaker statistical offense. Games are not won based on fan's perceptions, statistics, rankings, records, or any of those factors.
Games are generally won based on the teams that execute better, make the least amount of mistakes, and can find ways to win on game day.
Ultimately, all that matters is how teams perform on game day. Doesn't matter if the execution is run, pass, or playing quality defense.
Cowboys had their share of opportunities to win vs the Bucs. Cowboys failed to execute enough to win. The Bucs won in crunch time with a little luck ie questionable PI call. Some times teams create their own luck.
Comment