I think we've established Conner is better than Bell. So the next logical question - Is he better than Gurley too?
Gurley has more TDs. They average about the same # of YPC. Conner has more games of 100+yds rushing and 50+yds receiving and a TD.
Looking at the players around them, Gurley's not playing with AB getting double and triple teamed which probably helps.
Conner probably runs more physical vs Gurley's finesse game. But I could see a case made for both.
Plus it''s Conner's first year, so he's going through growing pains, so maybe give him a year and then let's compare.
Gurley has more TDs. They average about the same # of YPC. Conner has more games of 100+yds rushing and 50+yds receiving and a TD.
Looking at the players around them, Gurley's not playing with AB getting double and triple teamed which probably helps.
Conner probably runs more physical vs Gurley's finesse game. But I could see a case made for both.
Plus it''s Conner's first year, so he's going through growing pains, so maybe give him a year and then let's compare.

Comment