Some execs considered Edmunds a top 15 player

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • steeler_fan_in_t.o.
    Legend
    • May 2008
    • 10277

    #31
    Originally posted by feltdizz
    trust him, he's a PS poster.
    Sorry, I only trust posts that tell us that we will draft Rudolph in the first.
    http://i278.photobucket.com/albums/k...to_Mike/to.jpg

    Comment

    • steeler_fan_in_t.o.
      Legend
      • May 2008
      • 10277

      #32
      Originally posted by Steel Maniac
      Edmunds himself said at the draft that he and his agent felt he was going to get picked in round 2 or 3. He was only there on the first day to support his brother who everyone knew was a first round pick. And all the experts said he was a second round pick.

      But let's go with what you are intimating; let's say we take Landry and Edmunds is taken before our pick in the second round, then we still had Justin Reid or Jerome Baker and if we would have taken either one of those guys, none of us would have thought it was a bad pick.

      Again, I get why they took Edmunds and once you see how they want to use him, along with his athleticism, it was a good pick but it was just a matter of where they picked him. I like him long term.
      I hear what you are saying, but I believe that the Steelers pick the guy who they love and don't worry about what us or the experts think. As fans we look at draft picks as carbon units. This guy is a 7.2, this guy is a 7.1. We also read into what all the "experts" say but they are grading the player as a college player. The Steelers look at the player as they project him to fit into their scheme. I'm not saying that the pick will or won't pan out, but I'm saying that the Steelers love this kid more than Landry, and didn't want him to risk him getting away.

      If they had the opportunity to trade up for Evans then it looks like they would have, and then used their second rounder hopefully to get Edmunds. But I believe that Edmunds was the number one guy on their board and they wanted him badly.
      http://i278.photobucket.com/albums/k...to_Mike/to.jpg

      Comment

      • fordfixer
        Legend
        • May 2008
        • 10868

        #33
        Originally posted by Steelhere10
        I think you read the article wrong my friend.
        Ha, no I understood the article just fine. However when I read the title of the thread that was the first thing that popped in to my warped mind, I’m personally fine with the pick and like it even more, the more I read about him.

        Molon labe

        People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf. George Orwell

        ?We're not going to apologize for winning.?
        Mike Tomlin

        American metal pimped by asiansteel
        Only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you 1. Jesus Christ, 2.The American G.I., One died for your soul, the other for your freedom.

        Comment

        • NorthCoast
          Legend
          • Sep 2008
          • 26633

          #34
          Originally posted by steeler_fan_in_t.o.
          I hear what you are saying, but I believe that the Steelers pick the guy who they love and don't worry about what us or the experts think. As fans we look at draft picks as carbon units. This guy is a 7.2, this guy is a 7.1. We also read into what all the "experts" say but they are grading the player as a college player. The Steelers look at the player as they project him to fit into their scheme. I'm not saying that the pick will or won't pan out, but I'm saying that the Steelers love this kid more than Landry, and didn't want him to risk him getting away.

          If they had the opportunity to trade up for Evans then it looks like they would have, and then used their second rounder hopefully to get Edmunds. But I believe that Edmunds was the number one guy on their board and they wanted him badly.
          The big concern that everyone has is that the Steelers have been very poor at evaluating secondary talent for the last decade or so. It is also concerning that the majority of NFL teams thought Edmunds would go much later.

          Comment

          • flippy
            Legend
            • Dec 2008
            • 17088

            #35
            On the one hand, it's cool when the Steelers pick the unexpected. I kinda hope they found something no one else could see and they kept it close to the vest so no one else knew what they were doing either.

            But they also let so much info seep out to the media and that fact gives me pause with the unexpected picks. In that sense, it feels like a panic pick. We wanted our ILB, every possibility was basically gone and it felt like we went with the next best option that we might be able to plug into the system long term to serve a similar purpose.

            All this talk about picking the best player irregardless of position seems like lip service to me. We wanted an ILB in the first. We couldn't get him so we went for a big S. Maybe we got the best player on the board? I dunno. I have no way of knowing. But it feels like there must have been someone better.

            Then again, I don't mind the pick at all. I advocate swinging for the fences sometimes because the draft is a crapshoot any way. In some ways, the Steelers kinda drafted like I might.
            sigpic

            Comment

            • Steel Maniac
              Banned
              • Apr 2017
              • 19472

              #36
              Originally posted by steeler_fan_in_t.o.
              I hear what you are saying, but I believe that the Steelers pick the guy who they love and don't worry about what us or the experts think. As fans we look at draft picks as carbon units. This guy is a 7.2, this guy is a 7.1. We also read into what all the "experts" say but they are grading the player as a college player. The Steelers look at the player as they project him to fit into their scheme. I'm not saying that the pick will or won't pan out, but I'm saying that the Steelers love this kid more than Landry, and didn't want him to risk him getting away.

              If they had the opportunity to trade up for Evans then it looks like they would have, and then used their second rounder hopefully to get Edmunds. But I believe that Edmunds was the number one guy on their board and they wanted him badly.
              Colbert did try to get Evans; I’ll give him credit for that.

              Comment

              • Oviedo
                Legend
                • May 2008
                • 23823

                #37
                Originally posted by Steel Maniac
                Colbert did try to get Evans; I’ll give him credit for that.
                I'm sure he feels much better now getting some credit
                "My team, may they always be right, but right or wrong...MY TEAM!"

                Comment

                • Slapstick
                  Rookie
                  • May 2008
                  • 0

                  #38
                  It cracks me up how much some accuse the Steelers of panicking....

                  How many drafts has Colbert overseen? How long do teams have to prepare for the draft?
                  Actually, my post was NOT about you...but, if the shoe fits, feel free to lace that &!+€# up and wear it.

                  Comment

                  • Captain Lemming
                    Legend
                    • Jun 2008
                    • 16010

                    #39
                    Originally posted by NorthCoast
                    The big concern that everyone has is that the Steelers have been very poor at evaluating secondary talent for the last decade or so. It is also concerning that the majority of NFL teams thought Edmunds would go much later.
                    1. We don't REALLY know WHAT other NFL teams thought now do we?
                    We base OUR impressions on what so called "experts" who have no relation to NFL teams say.

                    2. You could not be more wrong about "evaluations". Fact is every single safety the Steelers have EVER selected in the first round in my lifetime has not only had a HOF career but is in the discussion for GOAT at the position. We have NEVER missed on a 1st round safety my friend. (OK we are talking one guy but saying it that way sure LOOKS real impressive).
                    Last edited by Captain Lemming; 05-03-2018, 08:58 AM.
                    sigpic



                    In view of the fact that Mike Tomlin has matched Cowhers record I give him the designation:

                    TCFCLTC-
                    The Coach Formerly Considered Less Than Cowher

                    Comment

                    • Steel Maniac
                      Banned
                      • Apr 2017
                      • 19472

                      #40
                      Originally posted by NorthCoast
                      The big concern that everyone has is that the Steelers have been very poor at evaluating secondary talent for the last decade or so. It is also concerning that the majority of NFL teams thought Edmunds would go much later.
                      Boom.............................................. .

                      Comment

                      • Steel Maniac
                        Banned
                        • Apr 2017
                        • 19472

                        #41
                        Originally posted by Captain Lemming
                        1. We don't REALLY know WHAT other NFL teams thought now do we?
                        We base OUR impressions on what so called "experts" who have no relation to NFL teams say.

                        2. You could not be more wrong about "evaluations". Fact is every single safety the Steelers have EVER selected in the first round in my lifetime has not only had a HOF career but is in the discussion for GOAT at the position. We have NEVER missed on a 1st round safety my friend. (OK we are talking one guy but saying it that way sure LOOKS real impressive).
                        Well, I hope that continues with Edmunds. But right now, that linebacker corps isn't very impressive to me. I still see Fournette running for that 18 yard TD against us in the playoffs.

                        Comment

                        • RuthlessBurgher
                          Legend
                          • May 2008
                          • 33208

                          #42
                          Originally posted by flippy
                          In some ways, the Steelers kinda drafted like I might.
                          Uh oh...now I'm a bit worried. I just always assumed that the Cleveland Clowns drafted like Flippy.
                          Steeler teams featuring stat-driven, me-first, fantasy-football-darling diva types such as Antonio Brown & Le'Veon Bell won no championships.

                          Super Bowl winning Steeler teams were built around a dynamic, in-your-face defense plus blue-collar, hard-hitting, no-nonsense football players on offense such as Hines Ward & Jerome Bettis.

                          We don't want Juju & Conner to replace what we lost in Brown & Bell.

                          We are counting on Juju & Conner to return us to the glory we once had with Hines & The Bus.

                          Comment

                          • feltdizz
                            Legend
                            • May 2008
                            • 27508

                            #43
                            Originally posted by Slapstick
                            It cracks me up how much some accuse the Steelers of panicking....

                            How many drafts has Colbert overseen? How long do teams have to prepare for the draft?
                            Rudolph in the first would've been a panic pick IMO.

                            We had a few safeties to choose from and thought Edmunds was the best one to fit our scheme. How is that a panic pick?

                            It could end up being the wrong pick if he doesn't pan out but panic pick? not at all
                            Steelers 27
                            Rats 16

                            Comment

                            • Captain Lemming
                              Legend
                              • Jun 2008
                              • 16010

                              #44
                              t
                              Originally posted by feltdizz

                              We had a few safeties to choose from and thought Edmunds was the best one to fit our scheme. How is that a panic pick?

                              It could end up being the wrong pick if he doesn't pan out but panic pick? not at all
                              True. We drafted a safety when there were SEVERAL similarly and even higher ranked (by so called experts) available. That is not "panic, it is who WE wanted at that point in the draft.
                              Fact is we TRIED to trade up for an inside linebacker. Clearly we WANTED an upgrade at the position.
                              A "panic" move would be to "reach" for a linebacker who we had lower on our board than the Edmunds pick.

                              We didnt "reach" for a safety. There were "plenty available.

                              Right or wrong we REALLY LIKED one safety and THAT is why Edmunds was drafted 1st.

                              Proof we dont reach for "position" is the fact that we NEVER drafted a linebacker at all.

                              Instead we drafted a second big safety over a linebacker, an offensive tackle over a linebacker, and a QB over a linebacker. We might disagree (heck I would "reach" for next best linebacker over a "project" tackle any day) but the fact that the positions drafted seemed somewhat random highlights the fact that we stay true to our board.

                              BPA on OUR board ....not even a "positions of need" for much of the draft.

                              Frankly in my view the only "need" pick was receiver after we traded Bryant, but ironically he is like the only guy in the entire draft whose "value" at that spot is never questioned. He was the most consensus BPA of ANYBODY we drafted.
                              Last edited by Captain Lemming; 05-03-2018, 11:08 AM.
                              sigpic



                              In view of the fact that Mike Tomlin has matched Cowhers record I give him the designation:

                              TCFCLTC-
                              The Coach Formerly Considered Less Than Cowher

                              Comment

                              • Steel Maniac
                                Banned
                                • Apr 2017
                                • 19472

                                #45
                                Originally posted by Captain Lemming
                                t

                                True. We drafted a safety when there were SEVERAL similarly and even higher ranked (by so called experts) available. That is not "panic, it is who WE wanted at that point in the draft.
                                Fact is we TRIED to trade up for an inside linebacker. Clearly we WANTED an upgrade at the position.
                                A "panic" move would be to "reach" for a linebacker who we had lower on our board than the Edmunds pick.

                                We didnt "reach" for a safety. There were "plenty available.

                                Right or wrong we REALLY LIKED one safety and THAT is why Edmunds was drafted 1st.

                                Proof we dont reach for "position" is the fact that we NEVER drafted a linebacker at all.

                                Instead we drafted a second big safety, an offensive tackle, and a QB. We might disagree (heck I would "reach" for next best linebacker over a "project" tackle any day) but the fact that the entire draft seemed somewhat random highlights the fact that we stay true to our board.

                                Frankly in my view the only "need" pick was receiver after we traded Bryant, but nobody guestions his "value" at that spot.
                                Me personally, the word "panic" never entered my thought process in the Edmunds pick. Clearly, we thought he was the best of the safety lot. And that was an area of need. And the fact that we didn't take ANY linebackers tells you that Colbert didn't think too much of the linebacker corps after the first 4 highly rated guys; Weather we agree with that is another topic.

                                The Washington pick has me excited to see how fast he clicks with Ben. But I didn't think he was a need pick because I still have Eli Rogers factored in to man that slot position. I thought we'd be perfectly fine with Mcdonald and Rogers running inside stuff and AB and Juju running the intermediate and deep stuff.

                                I'm sitting on my hands thou..I'm nervous as hell about our linebacker corps.

                                Comment

                                Working...