Time for a change

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Eddie Spaghetti
    Hall of Famer
    • Jul 2008
    • 4123

    #16
    to absolve tomlin of yesterday's performance is the height of absurdity and doesn't surprise me one bit considering the source

    ill prepared and horrible game management but nothing is ever his fault

    ridiculous

    Comment

    • Oviedo
      Legend
      • May 2008
      • 23824

      #17
      Originally posted by Eddie Spaghetti
      to absolve tomlin of yesterday's performance is the height of absurdity and doesn't surprise me one bit considering the source

      ill prepared and horrible game management but nothing is ever his fault

      ridiculous
      Thanks for your contribution to the discussion, but will consider the source
      "My team, may they always be right, but right or wrong...MY TEAM!"

      Comment

      • Ernie
        Legend
        • Aug 2013
        • 8470

        #18
        Originally posted by buccoray61
        No sacks,no take aways,of the 35 Jag running plays one tackle for a loss, 4 hits on Bottles...terrible
        Pretty sad stats for a defense that is supposedly built to stop the run and put pressure on the QB. My only question is... what percentage of it is Butler?

        Comment

        • Eddie Spaghetti
          Hall of Famer
          • Jul 2008
          • 4123

          #19
          so you agree

          never seen a guy defend a head coach at every turn and when he turns in a pathetic performance by his team and game management looks like the work if a 10 year old , it's everybody else's fault

          hypocrisy at it's finest

          Comment

          • buccoray61
            Starter
            • Jul 2009
            • 945

            #20
            Originally posted by Ernie
            Pretty sad stats for a defense that is supposedly built to stop the run and put pressure on the QB. My only question is... what percentage of it is Butler?
            That's a fair question.One I can't really answer.

            Comment

            • Sugar
              Hall of Famer
              • Oct 2008
              • 3700

              #21
              Originally posted by Ernie
              We also gave them 14 points due to turnovers.
              No. We gave them only 1 TD on turnovers. This Defense has stopped better Offenses for FG's in that situation.

              Comment

              • Ernie
                Legend
                • Aug 2013
                • 8470

                #22
                Originally posted by Sugar
                No. We gave them only 1 TD on turnovers. This Defense has stopped better Offenses for FG's in that situation.
                so 10 points minimum... the score differential was only 3ish

                Comment

                • Ernie
                  Legend
                  • Aug 2013
                  • 8470

                  #23
                  Originally posted by Sugar
                  No. We gave them only 1 TD on turnovers. This Defense has stopped better Offenses for FG's in that situation.
                  By your theory we should have kicked it deep at the end of the game (which I agree with)... instead of that weak a$$ onside kick that effectively ended the game.

                  Comment

                  Working...