The Davis hit to the head

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • pittpete
    Legend
    • Aug 2008
    • 6825

    The Davis hit to the head

    I was just curious on everyone's thoughts?
    sigpic
  • pittpete
    Legend
    • Aug 2008
    • 6825

    #2
    Just re watched it a few times. Although it was helmet to helmet what else could Davis do?
    It was so bang-bang only other thing is to let the receiver catch it.
    sigpic

    Comment

    • feltdizz
      Legend
      • May 2008
      • 27564

      #3
      I wish he held up a fraction of a second and snatched the ball but he was committed at that point. I wished he was a little lower on the hit but it's hard to separate someone from the ball that way.
      Steelers 27
      Rats 16

      Comment

      • diamondlucy
        Starter
        • Jan 2017
        • 506

        #4
        No matter what we think...Goodell will fine Davis. Anyone disagree ?

        Comment

        • Iron Shiek
          Hall of Famer
          • May 2008
          • 3798

          #5
          I didn't feel he led with the helmet though, and led with the shoulder instead. Unfortunately his helmet made contact with the Chiefs player's helmet. I still think it was the correct call by the letter of the law, but I don't necessarily agree with it. I don't think he could have done anything else and at this point the only thing the NFL can do to reduce/eliminate those types of concussions is to not allow any hits over the middle anymore. If you touch the WR when he catches it over the middle like that he is down. That is stupidly ridiculous, but I don't see any other options if the NFL truly took this seriously (which I don't think they do).
          sigpic

          Comment

          • phillyesq
            Legend
            • May 2008
            • 7568

            #6
            Originally posted by Iron Shiek
            I didn't feel he led with the helmet though, and led with the shoulder instead. Unfortunately his helmet made contact with the Chiefs player's helmet. I still think it was the correct call by the letter of the law, but I don't necessarily agree with it. I don't think he could have done anything else and at this point the only thing the NFL can do to reduce/eliminate those types of concussions is to not allow any hits over the middle anymore. If you touch the WR when he catches it over the middle like that he is down. That is stupidly ridiculous, but I don't see any other options if the NFL truly took this seriously (which I don't think they do).
            I also thought that he led with the shoulder. Under the letter of the law, yeah, I get that it's a penalty, but as you've said, what else is he supposed to do?

            I thought he went low, but unfortunately, the WR also went low.

            Comment

            • BURGH86STEEL
              Legend
              • May 2008
              • 6933

              #7
              I suppose he could had played for the ball instead of going for a big hit. It's a split second decision so....

              Comment

              • Northern_Blitz
                Legend
                • Dec 2008
                • 24382

                #8
                It's a tough play for a defender when everything is so fast, but the NFL has said that it's the D's fault no matter what.

                Thought it was a legit penalty. Just like the holding call.

                Comment

                • flippy
                  Legend
                  • Dec 2008
                  • 17088

                  #9
                  Definitely don't think it was intentional, but unfortunately it had to be called. Given the lack of intent though, it should have been less of a penalty than Kelce got for intentionally shoving Bob Ross Cockrell.
                  sigpic

                  Comment

                  • Shoe
                    Hall of Famer
                    • May 2008
                    • 4044

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Northern_Blitz
                    It's a tough play for a defender when everything is so fast, but the NFL has said that it's the D's fault no matter what.

                    Thought it was a legit penalty. Just like the holding call.
                    Exactly man. You can't be a hypocrite. The Davis hit was a flag, flat-out. You can quibble about it if you want, but then you're saying that the Fisher hold is debatable. I personally think the Davis hit was more obvious than the Fisher hold. In that play, it is just so hard for a Tackle to not let his hands go there when you are blocking a fire hydrant like Harrison.
                    I wasn't hired for my disposition.

                    Comment

                    • BradshawsHairdresser
                      Legend
                      • Dec 2008
                      • 7056

                      #11
                      I too think Davis led with the shoulder, not his helmet. It would have been very difficult to avoid helmet-to-helmet in that situation, IMO. Yes, going by the rule, it's a penalty, but it's an unfortunate one.

                      Comment

                      • Ghost
                        Legend
                        • May 2008
                        • 6413

                        #12
                        Play the ball, not the man (much easier said than done).

                        I try try to look at it from the opposite side - if that was Brown or Hamilton going for a catch and they got hit in the head by KC I would have been screaming for a penalty. Can't say Steelers shouldn't get one in that instance.
                        sigpic

                        Comment

                        • Mr.wizard
                          Legend
                          • May 2014
                          • 6686

                          #13
                          It's a penalty no doubt, even if Davis could have avoided the helmet to helmet contact there was no way he could of avoided going to the head or neck area of the receiver.

                          Comment

                          • BradshawsHairdresser
                            Legend
                            • Dec 2008
                            • 7056

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Mr.wizard
                            It's a penalty no doubt, even if Davis could have avoided the helmet to helmet contact there was no way he could of avoided going to the head or neck area of the receiver.
                            $$$$
                            They play the game in real time, not slow motion ...

                            Comment

                            • pittpete
                              Legend
                              • Aug 2008
                              • 6825

                              #15
                              Good dialogue fellas..
                              sigpic

                              Comment

                              Working...