Steelers with easiest strength of schedule remaining

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SanAntonioSteelerFan
    Legend
    • May 2008
    • 8361

    Steelers with easiest strength of schedule remaining

    But 3 games in AFC North.

    It's going to be a bruising run to the playoffs.


    We got our "6-PACK" - time to work on a CASE!

    HERE WE GO STEELERS, HERE WE GO!
  • bostonsteeler
    Pro Bowler
    • Oct 2008
    • 1529

    #2
    Prolly the only division where a 7-9 could make it to postseason. 5-5 and six to go.

    Next week either the Bengals or the Ravens will win one. Hopefully its the Bengals. The Browns will lose to whoever they're playing (Giants I think).
    Will we beat the colts?

    Comment

    • squidkid
      Legend
      • Feb 2012
      • 5847

      #3
      so you're telling me there's a chance
      steelers = 3 ring circus with tomlin being the head clown

      Comment

      • RuthlessBurgher
        Legend
        • May 2008
        • 33208

        #4
        I thought the Steelers were much more likely to win against playoff caliber teams but lose to a to the "scrub" teams....so wouldn't this revelation be a bad thing?
        Steeler teams featuring stat-driven, me-first, fantasy-football-darling diva types such as Antonio Brown & Le'Veon Bell won no championships.

        Super Bowl winning Steeler teams were built around a dynamic, in-your-face defense plus blue-collar, hard-hitting, no-nonsense football players on offense such as Hines Ward & Jerome Bettis.

        We don't want Juju & Conner to replace what we lost in Brown & Bell.

        We are counting on Juju & Conner to return us to the glory we once had with Hines & The Bus.

        Comment

        • Ernie
          Legend
          • Aug 2013
          • 8470

          #5
          Originally posted by RuthlessBurgher
          I thought the Steelers were much more likely to win against playoff caliber teams but lose to a to the "scrub" teams....so wouldn't this revelation be a bad thing?
          The Browns games (at least in Cleveland) are seldom pretty... even when we are really good. All in all, I'm glad to get out of there with a win. Would have like to see some other weapons mixed in...but, if there were 30 mph winds, I can see why the game was called the way it was.

          Comment

          • Flasteel
            Hall of Famer
            • May 2008
            • 4004

            #6
            Originally posted by RuthlessBurgher
            I thought the Steelers were much more likely to win against playoff caliber teams but lose to a to the "scrub" teams....so wouldn't this revelation be a bad thing?
            Losing to bad teams only applies when there is a widely-held expectation we will win. Even against the winless Browns, there was enough stank on the Steelers to disrupt that pattern.
            sigpic

            Comment

            • RuthlessBurgher
              Legend
              • May 2008
              • 33208

              #7
              Is our earlier loss to the Dolphins still considered to be a "scrub" team, now that they are on a 5 game winning streak?
              Steeler teams featuring stat-driven, me-first, fantasy-football-darling diva types such as Antonio Brown & Le'Veon Bell won no championships.

              Super Bowl winning Steeler teams were built around a dynamic, in-your-face defense plus blue-collar, hard-hitting, no-nonsense football players on offense such as Hines Ward & Jerome Bettis.

              We don't want Juju & Conner to replace what we lost in Brown & Bell.

              We are counting on Juju & Conner to return us to the glory we once had with Hines & The Bus.

              Comment

              • BradshawsHairdresser
                Legend
                • Dec 2008
                • 7056

                #8
                Originally posted by RuthlessBurgher
                Is our earlier loss to the Dolphins still considered to be a "scrub" team, now that they are on a 5 game winning streak?
                Why stop with Miami? What about Philly, who crushed the Steelers early, but have lost most of their games since? Are they still considered to be a "strong" team? Many fans hailed the win over Cincy as some kind of statement win, but the Bungles haven't exactly been setting the league on fire since then ... so did the Steelers really beat a "good" team there?

                And why do the Steelers have to be the team that so many teams with poor records "get well" against?

                Comment

                • squidkid
                  Legend
                  • Feb 2012
                  • 5847

                  #9
                  Originally posted by BradshawsHairdresser
                  Why stop with Miami? What about Philly, who crushed the Steelers early, but have lost most of their games since? Are they still considered to be a "strong" team? Many fans hailed the win over Cincy as some kind of statement win, but the Bungles haven't exactly been setting the league on fire since then ... so did the Steelers really beat a "good" team there?

                  And why do the Steelers have to be the team that so many teams with poor records "get well" against?

                  touche.....
                  steelers = 3 ring circus with tomlin being the head clown

                  Comment

                  Working...