Ok, so when do we talk about it???

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • pittpete
    Legend
    • Aug 2008
    • 6825

    Ok, so when do we talk about it???

    Going for two pt. conversion...
    sigpic
  • winwithd
    Starter
    • Nov 2009
    • 895

    #2
    An awful lot happened after that, no way to say it would have turned out the same way. They had TDs when we had fgs. That's the biggest thing. If we kicked the XP and had 16 pts, then they don't go for 2 and end the game with 17 pts and maybe win the game anyway if Boswell doesn't kick the FG.

    Comment

    • pittpete
      Legend
      • Aug 2008
      • 6825

      #3
      I hear ya, i didnt really think about it either until it came into play later at the end.
      sigpic

      Comment

      • winwithd
        Starter
        • Nov 2009
        • 895

        #4
        I thought about it when they went for 2 and hoped it didn't come back to bite them. Tomlin was being aggressive and that seems to just be the way he is. I don't think he will ever change that. I was 50/50 on it at the time but I understood the reasoning. I didn't see it as a huge gamble, but a little unorthodox.

        Comment

        • Mr.wizard
          Legend
          • May 2014
          • 6686

          #5
          I thought it was a good risk to try and make it a 3 score game, especially since they weren't moving the ball and ben was starting to get going. Worst case scenario is you don't get it and your up by 15.

          Comment

          • MCHammer
            Starter
            • Aug 2010
            • 574

            #6
            It made no sense and was stupid. Eventually, we'll get burned by this nonesense. Thankfully, it didn't happen tonight. Go Steelers.

            Comment

            • Northern_Blitz
              Legend
              • Dec 2008
              • 24382

              #7
              They make the 2 pt conversion more than 50% of the time. They should go for it every time.

              Comment

              • Mr.wizard
                Legend
                • May 2014
                • 6686

                #8
                Originally posted by Northern_Blitz
                They make the 2 pt conversion more than 50% of the time. They should go for it every time.
                Exactly, it makes a ton of sense to go for it

                Comment

                • RobinCole
                  Pro Bowler
                  • Apr 2014
                  • 1358

                  #9
                  It made sense to try to make it a three-possession lead. It was not stupid.

                  Comment

                  • papillon
                    Legend
                    • Mar 2008
                    • 11340

                    #10
                    I was fine with it tonight because a 15 or 16 point lead is still 2 possessions, a 17 point lead is 3 possessions, I just wish Ben would have run the effing thin into the endzone, I'm not sure why he threw it, unless there were Bengals that I couldn't see on TV. Hating on this one is just showing your dislike for Tomlin.

                    Pappy
                    sigpic

                    The 2025 Pittsburgh Steeler draft

                    1.21 - Derrick Harmon, DT, Oregon - Nick Emmanwori, S, S. Carolina
                    3.83 - Kaleb Johnson, RB, Iowa - DJ Giddens, RB, Kans St
                    3.123 - Will Howard, QB, OSU
                    4.156 - JJ Pegues, DT, Ole Miss
                    5.185 - Clay Webb, OG, Jack St
                    7.229 - Tyrion Ingram-Dawkins, DT, Georgia

                    "Football is a physical game, well, it used to be anyways" - Mel Blount

                    Comment

                    • NJ-STEELER
                      Legend
                      • May 2008
                      • 12563

                      #11
                      It was the right call as evidenced by the bengals scoring 2 tds and a FG

                      with the extra point we lose 17-16.
                      Needed to try and get to 17. And I think most coaches would have the dome the same thing in that situation.

                      Comment

                      • RuthlessBurgher
                        Legend
                        • May 2008
                        • 33208

                        #12
                        The dumber thing was Cincy throwing a backward pass on their 2 point attempt when they were up 1 and trying to go up 3. That was a fumble that we could have returned all the way for 2, meaning that we'd be up 1 instead. That was a HORRIBLE play call.
                        Steeler teams featuring stat-driven, me-first, fantasy-football-darling diva types such as Antonio Brown & Le'Veon Bell won no championships.

                        Super Bowl winning Steeler teams were built around a dynamic, in-your-face defense plus blue-collar, hard-hitting, no-nonsense football players on offense such as Hines Ward & Jerome Bettis.

                        We don't want Juju & Conner to replace what we lost in Brown & Bell.

                        We are counting on Juju & Conner to return us to the glory we once had with Hines & The Bus.

                        Comment

                        • papillon
                          Legend
                          • Mar 2008
                          • 11340

                          #13
                          Originally posted by RuthlessBurgher
                          The dumber thing was Cincy throwing a backward pass on their 2 point attempt when they were up 1 and trying to go up 3. That was a fumble that we could have returned all the way for 2, meaning that we'd be up 1 instead. That was a HORRIBLE play call.
                          If the Steelers pick up the 2 pt. conversion and return it for 2 points, who kicks off?

                          Pappy
                          sigpic

                          The 2025 Pittsburgh Steeler draft

                          1.21 - Derrick Harmon, DT, Oregon - Nick Emmanwori, S, S. Carolina
                          3.83 - Kaleb Johnson, RB, Iowa - DJ Giddens, RB, Kans St
                          3.123 - Will Howard, QB, OSU
                          4.156 - JJ Pegues, DT, Ole Miss
                          5.185 - Clay Webb, OG, Jack St
                          7.229 - Tyrion Ingram-Dawkins, DT, Georgia

                          "Football is a physical game, well, it used to be anyways" - Mel Blount

                          Comment

                          • MCHammer
                            Starter
                            • Aug 2010
                            • 574

                            #14
                            I deleted my post because it was incorrect
                            Last edited by MCHammer; 01-10-2016, 02:44 AM.

                            Comment

                            • NJ-STEELER
                              Legend
                              • May 2008
                              • 12563

                              #15
                              Originally posted by MCHammer
                              It never makes sense. You people are fu&*ing crazy. It's math. You are rationalizing after the fact to make sense of something after the fact. 15-0 was the situation. Going for 2 makes no sense. If you don't agree, you are wrong.

                              Not in this case. And I agreed with you when they tried it last week. i think most coaches go for the 2 points conversion there

                              Comment

                              Working...