17 points against Jax????

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • JAR
    Pro Bowler
    • May 2008
    • 1620

    #46
    The Seahawks only beat the lowly Skins by 10, I wonder how much doom and gloom is on their message boards?

    Comment

    • sick beats
      Pro Bowler
      • Dec 2013
      • 2144

      #47
      Originally posted by JAR
      The Seahawks only beat the lowly Skins by 10, I wonder how much doom and gloom is on their message boards?
      The Skins are no where near depleted as the Jags. J-Ville has virtually no RB, WRs, OL, CBs. I don't think you realize just how untalented J-ville is. The vast majority of their players wouldn't ever see the field on other teams. Beating the Skins, in their house, on MNF, by 10, is nothing to be ashamed of. Losing to the Bucs and then just barely beating the Jags is another whole different kettle of fish.

      Comment

      • K Train
        Hall of Famer
        • Jan 2014
        • 3685

        #48
        They didn't just barely beat them, they controlled the game pretty well. Doesn't matter if it was the defense doing the controlling they held them to 3 fgs and scored a TD on D

        Had they blown them out by 100 all of you would just say it means nothing because it was the sorry jaguars. Never happy, no matter what. I've never seen anything like it

        Comment

        • sick beats
          Pro Bowler
          • Dec 2013
          • 2144

          #49
          Originally posted by Mr.wizard
          They need to just keep it simple everything needs to run through are 3 stars, quit trying to spread out the production. It almost feels like a pee wee football mentality trying to get everyone their touches.
          Seriously. Fo wheel.

          Comment

          • WindyCitySteel
            Legend
            • Nov 2011
            • 15684

            #50
            Originally posted by sick beats
            The Skins are no where near depleted as the Jags. J-Ville has virtually no RB, WRs, OL, CBs. I don't think you realize just how untalented J-ville is. The vast majority of their players wouldn't ever see the field on other teams. Beating the Skins, in their house, on MNF, by 10, is nothing to be ashamed of. Losing to the Bucs and then just barely beating the Jags is another whole different kettle of fish.
            The Jags were 32nd in just about every defensive category. They were blown out 4 straight games.

            This should not have been a "trap" game after Tampa. I just think we might be on Jax's level.

            Comment

            • bostonsteeler
              Pro Bowler
              • Oct 2008
              • 1529

              #51
              Originally posted by RuthlessBurgher
              I also didn't understand why Archer took a knee after Tampa scored with 7 seconds left in the game last week. I think the percentages would show that it would be much more likely for a guy like Archer to return a kick 105 yards for a TD than it would for an 80 yard Cal-Stanford multiple lateral miracle play to happen.
              Mystified me too. Why didn't he just go for it? It wasn't like Ben was trying a major Hail Mary..

              Comment

              • hawaiiansteel
                Legend
                • May 2008
                • 35648

                #52
                TAS: Why do you think there is so much negativity towards the Steelers this year?

                Ed Bouchette: Because they lost two and in two of their three wins they have not played all that well, nearly blowing a 27-3 lead at home to the Browns and beating a winless Jacksonville team by just 10-9 until the pick-six in the fourth quarter. It's understandable for fans of a franchise that is used to winning

                [URL]http://www.post-gazette.com/sports/s...s/201410070200[/URL]

                Comment

                • sick beats
                  Pro Bowler
                  • Dec 2013
                  • 2144

                  #53
                  Originally posted by K Train
                  They didn't just barely beat them, they controlled the game pretty well. Doesn't matter if it was the defense doing the controlling they held them to 3 fgs and scored a TD on D

                  Had they blown them out by 100 all of you would just say it means nothing because it was the sorry jaguars. Never happy, no matter what. I've never seen anything like it
                  All other Jag opponents drop a minimum of 33, Skins hung 44 on them. And here come the mighty Steelers, only able to drop 10 on them. But you think everything is fine and dandy.

                  Comment

                  • hawaiiansteel
                    Legend
                    • May 2008
                    • 35648

                    #54
                    Alex Kozora @Alex_Kozora ·

                    All four sacks given up by the #Steelers came against the same Jacksonville coverage. Four under, three over, single high.

                    [URL]https://twitter.com/Alex_Kozora[/URL]

                    Comment

                    • Slapstick
                      Rookie
                      • May 2008
                      • 0

                      #55
                      Originally posted by hawaiiansteel
                      TAS: Why do you think there is so much negativity towards the Steelers this year?

                      Ed Bouchette: Because they lost two and in two of their three wins they have not played all that well, nearly blowing a 27-3 lead at home to the Browns and beating a winless Jacksonville team by just 10-9 until the pick-six in the fourth quarter. It's understandable for fans of a franchise that is used to winning

                      [URL]http://www.post-gazette.com/sports/s...s/201410070200[/URL]
                      What a nice way of saying that Steeler fans are spoiled!
                      Actually, my post was NOT about you...but, if the shoe fits, feel free to lace that &!+€# up and wear it.

                      Comment

                      • Mr.wizard
                        Legend
                        • May 2014
                        • 6686

                        #56
                        Originally posted by hawaiiansteel
                        Alex Kozora @Alex_Kozora ·

                        All four sacks given up by the #Steelers came against the same Jacksonville coverage. Four under, three over, single high.

                        [URL]https://twitter.com/Alex_Kozora[/URL]
                        Wow they where all from a 3 man rush? I wonder what downs they happened on? You would think if Ben kept seeing that look he would audible to a run.

                        Comment

                        • feltdizz
                          Legend
                          • May 2008
                          • 27532

                          #57
                          Originally posted by sick beats
                          All other Jag opponents drop a minimum of 33, Skins hung 44 on them. And here come the mighty Steelers, only able to drop 10 on them. But you think everything is fine and dandy.
                          It's crazy to think 10 points shouldn't warrant a WTF or a critique of the offense. If we put up 40 on the Jags we damn sure would shrug it off because everyone else put up 40+. Now all of a sudden we are supposed to respect the Jags talent.

                          How can anyone be happy about 10 points from our O?
                          Steelers 27
                          Rats 16

                          Comment

                          • feltdizz
                            Legend
                            • May 2008
                            • 27532

                            #58
                            Originally posted by Slapstick
                            What a nice way of saying that Steeler fans are spoiled!
                            umm... losing to the Bucs and barely beating the Jags means we are spoiled? LOL...

                            no, it just means we are fans who are wondering why we can't have a solid game vs bad teams.
                            Steelers 27
                            Rats 16

                            Comment

                            • K Train
                              Hall of Famer
                              • Jan 2014
                              • 3685

                              #59
                              lol if they scored 40 points youd just say "doesnt matter, it was just the jags"

                              and round and round we'd go

                              Comment

                              • feltdizz
                                Legend
                                • May 2008
                                • 27532

                                #60
                                Originally posted by K Train
                                lol if they scored 40 points youd just say "doesnt matter, it was just the jags"

                                and round and round we'd go
                                ummm... maybe it's because scoring 40 on the Jags is the norm?

                                when our "explosive" offense only puts up 10 points it stands out.
                                Steelers 27
                                Rats 16

                                Comment

                                Working...