No-huddle offense gives Steelers defense fits

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • hawaiiansteel
    Legend
    • May 2008
    • 35649

    No-huddle offense gives Steelers defense fits

    No-huddle offense gives Steelers defense fits

    By Mark Kaboly
    Sunday, Sept. 7, 2014



    Browns running back Terrance West leaps past the Steelers’ Ryan Shazier and Lawrence Timmons (94) during the third quarter Sunday, Sept. 7, 2014, at Heinz Field. The Browns scored 24 second-half points.

    Brett Keisel put it best when talking about getting the ball back to Ben Roethlisberger with less than a minute remaining in a tie game.

    “… and bada-bing,” Keisel said of Roethlisberger leading the Steelers on a winning field-goal drive to avert one of the biggest collapses in team history in a 30-27 win over the Cleveland Browns at Heinz Field.

    But before there was an opportunity at a Roethlisberger “bada-bing,” the defense put up — as Keisel put it — a “bada-boom.”

    More like bada-doom.

    After a first half in which the Steelers' re-vamped defense allowed 101 yards and five consecutive punts, the Browns turned up the tempo and gashed the Steelers defense.

    The Browns scored on four consecutive possessions and gained 319 of their 389 yards during the first five drives of the second half.

    The game plan was simple — no-huddle and quick tempo — and the results were similar to the third preseason game when the Eagles stunned the Steelers with their up-tempo offense.

    But unlike the Eagles, the Browns didn't run the no-huddle during the preseason, and the Steelers were caught off guard.

    “It was a nice little curveball they threw in there,” safety Troy Polamalu said.

    The Browns didn't use the no-huddle in the first half, and the offense was stagnant. They came out in the second half and ran it on 29 of their 40 plays. The Browns didn't plan to go to the no-huddle that much, but facing a 27-3 halftime deficit, Cleveland coach Mike Pettine figured to give it a try.

    “Just a change-up,” Pettine said. “Forcing teams to think a little faster, getting lined up, getting some first downs. It gets them tired.”

    The Steelers countered by rotating all five of their defensive linemen — Keisel, Cam Heyward, Cam Thomas, Steve McLendon, Stephon Tuitt — without any luck.

    “We started to lack some energy, but we have to fight through that,” Heyward said.

    The Browns didn't quite empty the playbook with the no-huddle. They ran outside zone to the left with Terrance West and Isaiah Crowell and used a play-action bootleg to the right with Brian Hoyer.

    “It was just one play after another and you could see it piecing together and we really got into a good rhythm,” Hoyer said.

    It took the Browns 93 seconds into the third quarter to score with the no-huddle. The first no-huddle play the Browns ran was a 22-yard run by West.

    “We got on our heels and never seemed to recover,” Keisel said.

    Until they had to, that is.

    “We knew we had to make a stop,” Keisel said. “In order to give ourselves a chance, we had to make a stop right away.”

    The Steelers forced a pair of punts late in a 27-27 game, including one after a three-and-out with less than a minute to go. Heyward sacked Hoyer, and William Gay came up with a pass defense and a tackle for a loss on a screen to get the Steelers the ball for a chance to win the game.

    “Sometimes, we just don't make stuff easy, but we always come through,” cornerback Ike Taylor said. “We have to understand that we have to play at a high level for four quarters. Not two, but four.”

    Now, the Steelers are expecting more no-huddle from offenses until they show they can stop it.

    “We have to put that fire out,” Gay said, “because the next team is going to try it.”

    That next team is Baltimore on Thursday, and the Ravens did that to the Steelers last year.

    [URL]http://triblive.com/sports/steelers/6749261-74/steelers-browns-huddle#ixzz3CgNxvh76[/URL]
  • Eich
    Legend
    • Jul 2010
    • 7043

    #2
    Supposedly, we are going to feature the hurry-up/no-huddle a lot more this year and have been practicing it in the off-season.
    And the football world saw us carved up by Philly's version in pre-season.


    If that's the case, then why isn't our defense more prepared for it?


    And where the h3ll was our no-huddle attack when our zillion point lead was evaporating in the 2nd half? That 2nd half was a head-scratcher for the ages.

    Comment

    • The Man of Steel
      Pro Bowler
      • Dec 2009
      • 2236

      #3
      Originally posted by Eich
      Supposedly, we are going to feature the hurry-up/no-huddle a lot more this year and have been practicing it in the off-season.
      And the football world saw us carved up by Philly's version in pre-season.


      If that's the case, then why isn't our defense more prepared for it?


      And where the h3ll was our no-huddle attack when our zillion point lead was evaporating in the 2nd half? That 2nd half was a head-scratcher for the ages.
      The Browns covered the spread and that's what the second half was all about.
      Obviously the standard is the standard.

      Comment

      • WindyCitySteel
        Legend
        • Nov 2011
        • 15684

        #4
        Originally posted by The Man of Steel
        The Browns covered the spread and that's what the second half was all about.
        Come again?

        The 2nd half was about a rookie coaching staff handing ours its lunch.

        Comment

        • BradshawsHairdresser
          Legend
          • Dec 2008
          • 7056

          #5
          Originally posted by WindyCitySteel
          Come again?

          The 2nd half was about a rookie coaching staff handing ours its lunch.
          $$$$$
          You saw the difference between a coaching staff that makes needed in-game adjustments, and one that can't (or won't).

          Comment

          • steelblood
            Hall of Famer
            • May 2008
            • 4166

            #6
            In the third quarter, we faced the worst group of skilled players we will face all year (with the possible exception of Jacksonville). No Gordon, no Cameron, no Tate. That group was fringe NFL talent. And they owned us. That is scary.
            Even if Bill Belichick was getting an atomic wedgie, his face would look exactly the same.

            Comment

            • feltdizz
              Legend
              • May 2008
              • 27531

              #7
              Originally posted by The Man of Steel
              The Browns covered the spread and that's what the second half was all about.
              This is a very underrated reply...
              Steelers 27
              Rats 16

              Comment

              • steelsnis
                Starter
                • Dec 2008
                • 980

                #8
                Originally posted by BradshawsHairdresser
                $$$$$
                You saw the difference between a coaching staff that makes needed in-game adjustments, and one that can't (or won't).
                I keep reading about the Steelers lack of adjustments. They were up 27-3 at the half, what adjustments were needed? Give the Browns credit for speeding things up in the second half on a hot day. It clearly winded the Steelers D and kept them from ever really getting set.

                They rotated D-Linemen throughout the second half, but the Browns up-tempo kept them off balance. It's next to impossible to make major adjustments to the defense in the middle of a quarter. Smart offenses will do things like this against a young, inexperienced Steelers D. Shazier got caught a few times in the wrong spot yesterday (as is to be expected for a rookie starter in his first NFL game).

                It looked like Cam Thomas was getting pushed backwards yesterday, and I wouldn't be surprised to see some changes there on Thursday.

                Comment

                • bowldog
                  Benchwarmer
                  • Jan 2013
                  • 54

                  #9
                  It was more misdirection that hurt us the most (look at the eagles preseason game). Our outside LB have to key on the QB when the play is going away from them, this would lead to easy sacks and a lot opportunities for TO, then chase down the running back form behind.

                  Comment

                  • Notleadpoisoned
                    Starter
                    • Mar 2010
                    • 554

                    #10
                    Originally posted by The Man of Steel
                    The Browns covered the spread and that's what the second half was all about.
                    Some healthy skepticism is never a bad thing.

                    Comment

                    • Oviedo
                      Legend
                      • May 2008
                      • 23824

                      #11
                      Originally posted by WindyCitySteel
                      Come again?

                      The 2nd half was about a rookie coaching staff handing ours its lunch.
                      Let me fix that for you "The 2nd half was about a rookie coaching staff handing our Legend, genius, Hall of Fame Defensive Coordinator his lunch"
                      "My team, may they always be right, but right or wrong...MY TEAM!"

                      Comment

                      • The Man of Steel
                        Pro Bowler
                        • Dec 2009
                        • 2236

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Notleadpoisoned
                        Some healthy skepticism is never a bad thing.
                        You have to be skeptical of the NFL and the bookies. That second half was a bit shady but hey, the Steelers won and the Browns covered the spread so it's all good I guess.
                        Obviously the standard is the standard.

                        Comment

                        • Iron City Inc.
                          Hall of Famer
                          • Jun 2013
                          • 3237

                          #13
                          Out coached. Out smarted. Lack of preparation. Cover the spread issues tongue in cheek.
                          Browns ran 64 plays Kiesel made 2 tackles and Thomas 1. Now when you can't stack and shed or get to the passer it does look like you're out smarted but the answer is more simple then that. Our DE's in the 5 teck must be able to stack n shed and they have got to at least help move the qb off the spot. Now McClendon had a few moments and Heyward too but just not enough. Could they have gotten worn down? Possible that conditioning was a factor. I say McCullers may need to be active on game days to keep d line fresh and Tuitt needs to see more reps. We got next to nothing out of Thomas and that is going to be seen by the coaches and change will come.

                          Comment

                          • skyhawk
                            Hall of Famer
                            • Dec 2008
                            • 3732

                            #14
                            The Steelers D has sucked against the hurry up passing teams for the last 10 years. How was this anything new?

                            Comment

                            • BradshawsHairdresser
                              Legend
                              • Dec 2008
                              • 7056

                              #15
                              Originally posted by skyhawk
                              The Steelers D has sucked against the hurry up passing teams for the last 10 years. How was this anything new?
                              Shouldn't have been. Makes it all the more incredible that they weren't at all prepared for it. Steelers' players were looking to the sideline for direction, but not getting it in time. Very poor.

                              Comment

                              Working...