Ben's best magic trick is making receivers appear much better than they are

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Shawn
    Legend
    • Mar 2008
    • 15131

    #16
    Originally posted by dizzfelt
    Holmes was pretty darn good at WR for us.
    Good, yes.
    Trolls are people too.

    Comment

    • Slapstick
      Rookie
      • May 2008
      • 0

      #17
      Originally posted by Shawn
      Slappy, I expect more from you. You are one of the brighter posters here. Comparing production after they leave with different QBs in different systems is apples to oranges. I want to see what they do with Ben. Wallace had a higher YPC and more TDs with comparable yards with Ben.
      ummm...isn't the argument that Ben makes WRs look better than they really are?

      What better way to compare Wallace and Burress then? If Ben makes WRs look good, why not compare how they look when NOT playing with Ben?
      Actually, my post was NOT about you...but, if the shoe fits, feel free to lace that &!+€# up and wear it.

      Comment

      • RuthlessBurgher
        Legend
        • May 2008
        • 33208

        #18
        Originally posted by Slapstick
        ummm...isn't the argument that Ben makes WRs look better than they really are?

        What better way to compare Wallace and Burress then? If Ben makes WRs look good, why not compare how they look when NOT playing with Ben?
        Eli Manning with a good OL vs. Ryan Tannehill behind an OL in utter shambles isn't exactly an apples to apples comparison, though.
        Steeler teams featuring stat-driven, me-first, fantasy-football-darling diva types such as Antonio Brown & Le'Veon Bell won no championships.

        Super Bowl winning Steeler teams were built around a dynamic, in-your-face defense plus blue-collar, hard-hitting, no-nonsense football players on offense such as Hines Ward & Jerome Bettis.

        We don't want Juju & Conner to replace what we lost in Brown & Bell.

        We are counting on Juju & Conner to return us to the glory we once had with Hines & The Bus.

        Comment

        • Slapstick
          Rookie
          • May 2008
          • 0

          #19
          Originally posted by RuthlessBurgher
          Eli Manning with a good OL vs. Ryan Tannehill behind an OL in utter shambles isn't exactly an apples to apples comparison, though.
          Perhaps not...

          But, again, if the argument is that Ben makes WRs look better than they really are, how does comparing them with Ben refute or support that particular argument?

          He made Wallace look more better than he did Plaxico?
          Actually, my post was NOT about you...but, if the shoe fits, feel free to lace that &!+€# up and wear it.

          Comment

          • dizzfelt
            Banned
            • Jun 2014
            • 16

            #20
            Originally posted by Slapstick

            He made Wallace look more better than he did Plaxico?
            our offensive philosophy was different with Plax.... we were more ball control and weren't stretching the field like we were under BA. Wallace primarily ran go routes so it appears he was better but he wasn't.

            Comment

            • Shawn
              Legend
              • Mar 2008
              • 15131

              #21
              I don't think Wallace was better. My statement was a counter that Plax was light years ahead of Wallace and IMO that just isn't the case.
              Trolls are people too.

              Comment

              • Mr.wizard
                Legend
                • May 2014
                • 6686

                #22
                Originally posted by Oviedo
                I think the Dolphins regret giving Wallace 50% of his salary. Dolphins fans hate the guys and feel he was a bad investment
                This is absolutely not true, I live here in palm beach and the talk is about tannehill and their dreadful o-line. I watched every dolphins game last season and mike was opened a lot last season but tannehill couldn't hit anyone. Not to mention the dolphins where hell bent on trying to pound the rock behind a terrible o-line which eventually got the coordinator fired. Dolphins had a ton of problems last season but mike Wallace was not one of them.

                Comment

                • SteelCrazy
                  Legend
                  • Aug 2008
                  • 5049

                  #23
                  Talent wise, Plax was way ahead of the game as a pure WR. Wallace wasn't dubbed a one trick pony for no reason. Yes, Tomlin was trying to get more out of him by saying that, but it also happened to be true. Burress could stretch the field, run nice routes and be that red zone threat. Not sure how anyone could grade them out to be the same, but it is all subjective.
                  2019 Mock

                  1. ILB
                  2. CB
                  3. ILB
                  4. S
                  5. CB
                  6. ILB
                  7. S

                  Comment

                  Working...