Shazier will Take Timmons spot at Mack

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • steelerkeylargo
    Hall of Famer
    • Mar 2009
    • 2507

    Shazier will Take Timmons spot at Mack

    Timmons will move to Buck






  • TD386Steel
    Backup
    • Sep 2008
    • 277

    #2
    I think that will help out with the size issue of Shazier

    Comment

    • pittpete
      Legend
      • Aug 2008
      • 6825

      #3
      Yes, because Timmons is so much bigger than Shazier
      6-1 234 Timmons (closer to 245 IMO)
      6-1 237 Shazier
      sigpic

      Comment

      • Eddie Spaghetti
        Hall of Famer
        • Jul 2008
        • 4123

        #4
        i think they will be interchangeable and moved around quite a bit

        call them whatever you want

        Comment

        • SS Laser
          Pro Bowler
          • Apr 2009
          • 1929

          #5
          Originally posted by Eddie Spaghetti
          i think they will be interchangeable and moved around quite a bit

          call them whatever you want
          Yes sir just like safeties in Dick's scheme.

          Comment

          • focosteeler
            Starter
            • May 2010
            • 760

            #6
            Originally posted by pittpete
            Yes, because Timmons is so much bigger than Shazier
            6-1 234 Timmons (closer to 245 IMO)
            6-1 237 Shazier
            I can't remember where but I read that Timmons was pushing 250lbs last season
            1. CB – Marcus Peters – Washington – 6/190
            2. OG – Josue Matias – Florida State – 6-6/320
            3. OLB – Geneo Grissom – Oklahoma – 6-4/250
            4. DL – Ellis McCarthy – UCLA – 6-5/330
            5. TE – Jeff Heurman – Ohio State – 6-5/255
            6. FS – Adrian Amos – Penn State – 6/200
            7. DT – Terry Williams – East Carolina – 6-1/340

            UDFA
            DB – Justin Cox – Mississippi St. – 6-2/190
            OLB – Davis Tull – Chattanooga – 6-2/242

            Comment

            • Slapstick
              Rookie
              • May 2008
              • 0

              #7
              Timmons practied calling the D signals last year...I also think that Mack might be less demanding, assignment wise...
              Actually, my post was NOT about you...but, if the shoe fits, feel free to lace that &!+€# up and wear it.

              Comment

              • TD386Steel
                Backup
                • Sep 2008
                • 277

                #8
                Originally posted by pittpete
                Yes, because Timmons is so much bigger than Shazier
                6-1 234 Timmons (closer to 245 IMO)
                6-1 237 Shazier
                I always thought he was bigger then that. I like the pick hope it works out

                Comment

                • pittpete
                  Legend
                  • Aug 2008
                  • 6825

                  #9
                  That was Timmons college weight..
                  He looks a lot bigger, but the weight room will do that to a person...LOL
                  sigpic

                  Comment

                  • Slapstick
                    Rookie
                    • May 2008
                    • 0

                    #10
                    I think putting Timmons at Buck will generally keep him closer to the LOS, which is where I think he shines...
                    Actually, my post was NOT about you...but, if the shoe fits, feel free to lace that &!+€# up and wear it.

                    Comment

                    • steelerkeylargo
                      Hall of Famer
                      • Mar 2009
                      • 2507

                      #11
                      Originally posted by slapstick
                      i think putting timmons at buck will generally keep him closer to the los, which is where i think he shines...
                      bingo!!!!!!!!!






                      Comment

                      Working...