How would YOU use Bell and Blount?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SteelCrazy
    Legend
    • Aug 2008
    • 5049

    How would YOU use Bell and Blount?

    I like the idea of using them both at the same time. With today's D's set up to stop the pass, we should go run heavy and run the veer. Mix in some passes to whoever. Going back to basics may pay off and with 2 huge backs we could wear downa D in a hurry.
    2019 Mock

    1. ILB
    2. CB
    3. ILB
    4. S
    5. CB
    6. ILB
    7. S
  • Ernie
    Legend
    • Aug 2013
    • 8470

    #2
    Originally posted by SteelCrazy
    I like the idea of using them both at the same time. With today's D's set up to stop the pass, we should go run heavy and run the veer. Mix in some passes to whoever. Going back to basics may pay off and with 2 huge backs we could wear downa D in a hurry.
    Did I hear somewhere that Bell said on twitter that he initially wasn't happy that blount was signed? I am hoping this is rumor! In my opinion, Bell hasn't earned the right to say that about any player that is being brought in to help the team. Bell is a very promising young back, and has shown us some things to get excited about... with that being said, I don't think he is YET what many have him built up to be though. 1- 100 yard rushing game is hardly considered "Proven" in this league.

    Blount is a guy in my opinion who is going to come in and push Bell for playing time....and I think the FO stated to him as much. He could be a feature back on a fair percentage of the NFL teams.

    Comment

    • Sugar
      Hall of Famer
      • Oct 2008
      • 3700

      #3
      Originally posted by Ernie
      Did I hear somewhere that Bell said on twitter that he initially wasn't happy that blount was signed? I am hoping this is rumor! In my opinion, Bell hasn't earned the right to say that about any player that is being brought in to help the team. Bell is a very promising young back, and has shown us some things to get excited about... with that being said, I don't think he is YET what many have him built up to be though. 1- 100 yard rushing game is hardly considered "Proven" in this league.

      Blount is a guy in my opinion who is going to come in and push Bell for playing time....and I think the FO stated to him as much. He could be a feature back on a fair percentage of the NFL teams.
      I'll admit that I don't see everything these guys tweet. However, what I did see from Bell had him welcoming Blount to the team. Bell is a more versatile weapon and should be the primary back. However, I would still like to see Blount get around 10 carries a game- maybe more if we're taking the air out at the end of games.

      Comment

      • Chadman
        Legend
        • May 2008
        • 6537

        #4
        Reckon we'll see a heavier dose of running plays now that there are 2 solid RB's on the roster. Would expect Blount to get 10 or so carries a game, Bell 15-20 not including passes his way. Then mix in a 3rd down guy (unless Bell takes that role now) and we could see 30 odd rushes a game. Might take the pressure of the need to get a WR early that way.
        The people that are trying to make the world worse never take a day off, why should I?

        Light up the darkness.

        Comment

        • SidSmythe
          Hall of Famer
          • Sep 2008
          • 4708

          #5
          same roll Blount had with N.E.
          Backup and Kick Return Guy
          Here We Go Steelers, Here We Go...
          Here We Go Steelers, Here We Go...
          Here We Go Steelers, Here We Go...!!!

          Comment

          • Shoe
            Hall of Famer
            • May 2008
            • 4044

            #6
            Originally posted by SidSmythe
            same roll Blount had with N.E.
            Backup and Kick Return Guy
            That's probably right.
            Though, if Bell is the especially versatile weapon that he was purported to be (when we drafted him), I'd like to think they add some wrinkles (e.g. splitting Bell wide?) that will take advantage of that.
            I wasn't hired for my disposition.

            Comment

            • hawaiiansteel
              Legend
              • May 2008
              • 35648

              #7
              Originally posted by SidSmythe
              same roll Blount had with N.E.
              Backup and Kick Return Guy
              I would add short-yardage and goal line back...

              Comment

              • Snatch98
                Pro Bowler
                • May 2008
                • 1451

                #8
                Originally posted by hawaiiansteel
                I would add short-yardage and goal line back...
                Blount isn't going to be poaching goal line carries unless bell is tired. Let's keep in mind just how effective bell was last season picking up the tough yards.

                Comment

                • hawaiiansteel
                  Legend
                  • May 2008
                  • 35648

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Snatch98
                  Blount isn't going to be poaching goal line carries unless bell is tired. Let's keep in mind just how effective bell was last season picking up the tough yards.
                  last year Bell converted 11 of 16 carries on 3rd or 4th down with less than 3 yards to go while Jonathan Dwyer converted 9 of 13 opportunities, both averaging roughly 69%.

                  Blount weighs 250 lbs, last season with the Patriots* he shared short-yardage duties with Stevan Ridley and converted 5 of 7 such opportunities for a 71% success rate. I see no reason why Blount won't get at least as many of the short-yardage carries that Dwyer got last season.
                  Last edited by hawaiiansteel; 03-29-2014, 11:30 PM.

                  Comment

                  • Discipline of Steel
                    Hall of Famer
                    • Aug 2008
                    • 3882

                    #10
                    Bell Ringer and Blount Force Trauma...Yeah!
                    To hell with Goodell!
                    sigpic
                    Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, hear the lamentations of their women.

                    Comment

                    • Ernie
                      Legend
                      • Aug 2013
                      • 8470

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Sugar
                      I'll admit that I don't see everything these guys tweet. However, what I did see from Bell had him welcoming Blount to the team. Bell is a more versatile weapon and should be the primary back. However, I would still like to see Blount get around 10 carries a game- maybe more if we're taking the air out at the end of games.
                      I also saw where he welcomed him to the team..but that was after the initial tweet mentioned above. I would also agree that Bell is the more versatile back (in that he can catch passes).

                      Comment

                      • Steelerphile
                        Pro Bowler
                        • Dec 2008
                        • 1198

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Ernie
                        I also saw where he welcomed him to the team..but that was after the initial tweet mentioned above. I would also agree that Bell is the more versatile back (in that he can catch passes).
                        I don't think you should jump to conclusion about some tweet of negative connotations that may have originated from Bell. Bell has seemed nothing but gracious, coachable and grounded in interviews. He certainly has enough good sense to know that he can't carry the ball himself 400 times, and that there was no one else on the roster. Unless there is something personal between he and Blount, which I doubt, why would he not welcome a good player and someone who can help him shoulder the load and improve the running game, which has been too far down the charts the last few years?

                        Comment

                        • Ernie
                          Legend
                          • Aug 2013
                          • 8470

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Steelerphile
                          I don't think you should jump to conclusion about some tweet of negative connotations that may have originated from Bell. Bell has seemed nothing but gracious, coachable and grounded in interviews. He certainly has enough good sense to know that he can't carry the ball himself 400 times, and that there was no one else on the roster. Unless there is something personal between he and Blount, which I doubt, why would he not welcome a good player and someone who can help him shoulder the load and improve the running game, which has been too far down the charts the last few years?

                          I did a little research on what was tweeted... This was clearly a case of Bell showing his true feelings on the Blount signing... with a following post being damage control. I'm with you phile, he should welcome this signing.. it is fairly obvious to me that Bell feels threatened by this signing.


                          Steelers Le’Veon Bell gets upset about signing competition
                          Today the Pittsburgh Steelers signed a new running back to the back field with LaGarrette Blount the former New England Patriots back. Well one person seemed kind of upset with the signing.

                          @L_Bell26: I can’t remember the last time I was THIS angry!!!

                          After posting this tweet Bell followed it up welcoming his competition.

                          @L_Bell26: welcome to the fam @LG_Blount …can’t wait to work with youu bro bro! #SteelCity

                          ***Update***

                          I was contacted by Le’Veon’s camp who stated that the timing of his first post was bad, but was not intended towards Blount.

                          I was told Bell is excited to work with the former New England Patriots bruiser.

                          Comment

                          • Ernie
                            Legend
                            • Aug 2013
                            • 8470

                            #14
                            You know what though... after reading this again... it is possible, albeit unlikely, that Bell's comments were based on something away from football entirely. Maybe the guy was just having a bad day...lol. Complete coincidence maybe?! I'll give him the benefit of the doubt...

                            Comment

                            • Sugar
                              Hall of Famer
                              • Oct 2008
                              • 3700

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Ernie
                              You know what though... after reading this again... it is possible, albeit unlikely, that Bell's comments were based on something away from football entirely. Maybe the guy was just having a bad day...lol. Complete coincidence maybe?! I'll give him the benefit of the doubt...
                              It's not unlikely at all. In fact, it's the most probably scenario really.

                              Comment

                              Working...