Worilds Ranked Second Best Free Agent LB

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • squidkid
    Legend
    • Feb 2012
    • 5847

    #46
    Originally posted by ikestops85
    I think many have forgotten how well Worilds played in 2012 when he subbed for Woodley. Yes, he subbed for Harrison at the beginning of the year and played badly but later on when Woodley got hurt Worilds played well. I still don't know why there is such a difference between how he plays on the right side vs. the left side. I just know when he plays on the left side he flashes pro bowl talent.

    yup, people want to knock worilds for his play on the right side but when woodley moved there, he didnt do **** either. but some want us to let worilds walk and continue to get raped by woodley
    steelers = 3 ring circus with tomlin being the head clown

    Comment

    • birtikidis
      Hall of Famer
      • May 2008
      • 4628

      #47
      problem is that Worilds has a pretty lenghthy injury history

      Comment

      • squidkid
        Legend
        • Feb 2012
        • 5847

        #48
        Originally posted by birtikidis
        problem is that Worilds has a pretty lenghthy injury history
        more than LameR?
        steelers = 3 ring circus with tomlin being the head clown

        Comment

        • birtikidis
          Hall of Famer
          • May 2008
          • 4628

          #49
          Originally posted by squidkid
          more than LameR?
          For a guy who didn't start? Was probably worse. He couldn't get in the game and he'd get hurt. Like Brian Griese...

          Comment

          • SS Laser
            Pro Bowler
            • Apr 2009
            • 1929

            #50
            Way to lazy to look it up. But besides a few sacks does Worilds have any strips or multiple sack games? Really Pro bowl level? Someone else here said one of the best OLB in the league, REALLY? I did not see it. I seen the best OLB on this team with bad OLB play is all. So that does not say much. How has Kruger played? Not sold on Worilds at all. Would keep him for a Steelers friendly deal but nothing else from my point of view. Can Worilds even be a Gildon? Who fans love to hate it seems to me. Was Gildon more then a average OLB? Do we want a average OLB? Or is this all about Woodley really hurting this team and fans? Really wish Woodley would get his head out of his ASS! He can be a game changer. Can Worilds be a game changer? I am not so sure.

            Comment

            • birtikidis
              Hall of Famer
              • May 2008
              • 4628

              #51
              I think Worilds could be above average, I just don't think he can stay healthy. Myself, I'd cut Woodley, sign Worilds but he'd rotate pretty heavy to make sure he stays healthy.

              Comment

              • Shoe
                Hall of Famer
                • May 2008
                • 4044

                #52
                Originally posted by SS Laser
                Way to lazy to look it up. But besides a few sacks does Worilds have any strips or multiple sack games? Really Pro bowl level? Someone else here said one of the best OLB in the league, REALLY? I did not see it. I seen the best OLB on this team with bad OLB play is all. So that does not say much. How has Kruger played? Not sold on Worilds at all. Would keep him for a Steelers friendly deal but nothing else from my point of view. Can Worilds even be a Gildon? Who fans love to hate it seems to me. Was Gildon more then a average OLB? Do we want a average OLB? Or is this all about Woodley really hurting this team and fans? Really wish Woodley would get his head out of his ASS! He can be a game changer. Can Worilds be a game changer? I am not so sure.
                Worilds is definitely on that Gildon scale. I think Gildon is the top of the scale, and a guy like Clark Haggans is the bottom of such scale. That is, a solid guy who doesn't move the needle. If you can team that kind of guy with a guy who does move the needle (i.e. a Peezy, James Harrison), you have yourself a nice situation. My problem with marrying Worilds really, is that I have a feeling that Jarvis Jones is the same type of guy (i.e. only a 7-9 sack guy). And since we're already tied to Jones, we shouldn't tie ourselves to another above-average yet not game-breaking player. Not at OLB, which is a feature position in our D.

                We need at least one great player, a "difference-maker" playing there. Worilds isn't it IMO. Jarvis may not be it (I reserve full judgement, but I'm hesitant). Woodley has proven he isn't it either. We gotta just focus on that, and see if there is such a player in the Top 15 (I think there are three, two of which figure to be gone by then.)
                I wasn't hired for my disposition.

                Comment

                Working...