Pittsburgh Steelers Fans Wrong on Loss of Mike Wallace

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • hawaiiansteel
    Legend
    • May 2008
    • 35649

    Pittsburgh Steelers Fans Wrong on Loss of Mike Wallace

    Pittsburgh Steelers Fans Wrong on Loss of Mike Wallace

    By Sheldon Rodgers | Yahoo! Contributor Network – Thu, Jun 27, 2013

    COMMENTARY | I have always held Pittsburgh Steelers enthusiasts in high regard as being the most knowledgeable and educated of any fanbase in the NFL. However, recent discussions I have had with many of Steelers Nation have me beginning to question the truth of this statement, and all because of a player that is no longer with the organization. That player is wide receiver Mike Wallace, and the common thread of what I am hearing is that, essentially, Wallace is a bum and the team is better off without him.

    At first, I thought these types of comments were merely sour grapes from a few fans that were upset that Wallace had signed with the Miami Dolphins instead of reupping with the Steelers. But then those comments continued throughout the offseason, becoming more and more vitriolic as time went by, and said by more and more people that I've spoken with on the matter.

    I couldn't wrap my head around it, as Wallace had been one of the more spectacular offensive players on the team in many years. He is widely regarded as the fastest player in the NFL and was one of the few wide receivers to make an impact as a Steelers rookie and throughout his four years with the team.

    There also can be no denying that Pittsburgh has very little in the way of proven pass catchers to take his place, and there seems to be no guarantees that his on-field production can be compensated for this upcoming season.

    We're talking about a player that has 32 touchdown receptions in those four seasons, with 4,042 yards and an average yards per catch of 17.2. Throw in the fact that Wallace has the longest TD catch in Steelers history (95 yards), led the league in yards per catch in 2009 and the AFC in 2010 and the picture is clearly painted of a guy who can flat out ball in the National Football League. No matter how you slice it, those are exceptional numbers and ones that absolutely cannot be easily replaced.

    The complaints that I heard vary to some degree. One recurring knock on Wallace was that his hands were poor and he dropped too many balls. The numbers don't show that to be true, though, as Wallace had a total of six dropped passes in 2012. That didn't even place him into the top 25 players with the most drops. And even if he had double-digit drops, he would be in the company of Jimmy Graham, Victor Cruz, Calvin Johnson and Brandon Marshall. That is not bad company to be in.

    Others have said that Antonio Brown is simply the better receiver. Here again, the numbers don't show that to be true either. The most touchdowns that Brown had in a season was 5, while the least amount of touchdowns that Wallace had was 6. Brown also had fewer receiving yards than Wallace in each of the three seasons that they played together.

    While Brown is an excellent player, it is not true to say that he is better than Wallace. Maybe 2013 is the year that Brown shows me otherwise, but the truest thing I can say about all of this is that Pittsburgh was better off having both Wallace and Brown, and they are certainly not a better team now that Wallace is gone, at least not on the field.

    This, then, takes me back to my original assertion and those feelings of sour grapes. But these feelings were not just based on Wallace signing with a different team this offseason. It goes back to the attitude that Wallace had as a rookie, and being the leader of the "Young Money Crew."

    For the uninitiated, the "Young Money Crew" was the name Wallace gave to himself and the other new receivers coming onto the team from 2010 to 2012 and included Brown and Emmanuel Sanders. Like the name implies, Wallace let everyone know early on what he was about: money. He backed up this sentiment last offseason, holding out of training camp in complaint of his contract.

    That doesn't fly in Pittsburgh. There is one surefire way to become beloved in this town, and that is to work your butt off, every day and every game, without complaint and without braggadocio. See Heath Miller or Hines Ward. If you play for a team in this city and you're only about the money, then the fans will gladly see you leave, regardless of how good you are.

    So there it is in a nutshell. Wallace was not our kind of person, plain and simple. So while I wasn't sad to see him leave, either, I still know that his absence will be felt on the field of play. While Wallace has indeed presented himself as a bum, it was in the newspapers and not on the gridiron.

    [URL]http://sports.yahoo.com/news/pittsburgh-steelers-fans-wrong-loss-mike-wallace-212700392.html[/URL]
  • Djfan
    Legend
    • May 2008
    • 5184

    #2
    We'll miss him. But, not much. There are other guys dying to prove themselves. Wallace just isn't B&G material, IMO. Doesn't fight to win, not clutch, money hungry, seems focused on himself over team, instead of self as part of team.

    No big loss. He was over paid by Miami.
    Steel City Mafia
    So Cal Boss (Ret)
    [URL]http://www.anewsong.com[/URL]

    Comment

    • NorthCoast
      Legend
      • Sep 2008
      • 26636

      #3
      You can't deny his production. But his production as a Steeler was clearly in decline.... for whatever reason. Did the NE miss R Moss when he left? Yes. Did they survive? Yes. (and Wallace ain't no RM).

      Comment

      • Shoe
        Hall of Famer
        • May 2008
        • 4044

        #4
        I've said this all along. People here are overly dismissing Wallace as if he was Darrius Heyward-Bey or James Jett. He isn't just some fast guy playing WR. You don't see the "just fast guy" types making the impact he did. He will be missed, and we will see that when the middle of the field looks more compressed this year (hopefully, the new running game help open up the deep ball to take advantage likewise).

        One thing the article isn't pointing out--that he wouldn't be held to this standard if he wasn't paid in the manner he was. he is being judged with the top WRs in the game now. (He may not be getting quite the dollars of Fitz or Calvin, but it is what it is.) And in that regard, he certainly has deficiciencies. As a lower-end #1 or top-flight #2? He's fine.
        I wasn't hired for my disposition.

        Comment

        • AzStillers1989
          Pro Bowler
          • Jul 2010
          • 1286

          #5
          He's gone.... Lets move on and focus on the men we have on the roster and put them in the best postion for this team to succeed.
          Last edited by AzStillers1989; 06-29-2013, 02:27 PM.
          sigpic

          Comment

          • LordVile
            Starter
            • Sep 2009
            • 834

            #6
            dumb article.. we all know he is a good player but we didn't wana over pay for him and screw up the team $$$
            Black N' Gold Til' I'm Dead N' Cold...
            [url=http://img203.imageshack.us/i/32023126285034060670100.jpg/]http://img203.imageshack.us/img203/4...4060670100.jpg[/url]
            [url=http://img19.imageshack.us/i/steelertowngal.jpg/]http://img19.imageshack.us/img19/107...lertowngal.jpg[/url]
            We don't have any cheerleaders but we do have a few of these \m/...

            Comment

            • BradshawsHairdresser
              Legend
              • Dec 2008
              • 7056

              #7
              Thanks for the memories, Mike.

              Now, next man up.

              Comment

              • Oviedo
                Legend
                • May 2008
                • 23824

                #8
                Originally posted by Shoe
                I've said this all along. People here are overly dismissing Wallace as if he was Darrius Heyward-Bey or James Jett. He isn't just some fast guy playing WR. You don't see the "just fast guy" types making the impact he did. He will be missed, and we will see that when the middle of the field looks more compressed this year (hopefully, the new running game help open up the deep ball to take advantage likewise).

                One thing the article isn't pointing out--that he wouldn't be held to this standard if he wasn't paid in the manner he was. he is being judged with the top WRs in the game now. (He may not be getting quite the dollars of Fitz or Calvin, but it is what it is.) And in that regard, he certainly has deficiciencies. As a lower-end #1 or top-flight #2? He's fine.

                I disagree. I think Wallace is very much like Heyward-Bey and Jett. Lacking developed WR skills who get by on speed. Wallace's only benefit is that he has had a better QB throwing him the ball than the others you mention.

                Much like when some bemoaned the loss of Stupidio Holmes we won't miss Wallace in the long run and Miami will not get the production they think they paid for.
                "My team, may they always be right, but right or wrong...MY TEAM!"

                Comment

                • Djfan
                  Legend
                  • May 2008
                  • 5184

                  #9
                  Ovi nailed it. He will be a memory to NFL fans as the "one who could'a been", and had a couple of good years.
                  Steel City Mafia
                  So Cal Boss (Ret)
                  [URL]http://www.anewsong.com[/URL]

                  Comment

                  • Sugar
                    Hall of Famer
                    • Oct 2008
                    • 3700

                    #10
                    I agree with the article. There is no reason to hate on Mike from a playing perspective. He just didn't fit in with what a lot of fans thought he should be. Frankly, I'm not sure his skill set will be best used in Haley's O anyway, so no need to pay high dollars for a tool you don't really need.

                    Comment

                    • Oviedo
                      Legend
                      • May 2008
                      • 23824

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Sugar
                      I agree with the article. There is no reason to hate on Mike from a playing perspective. He just didn't fit in with what a lot of fans thought he should be. Frankly, I'm not sure his skill set will be best used in Haley's O anyway, so no need to pay high dollars for a tool you don't really need.
                      I don't think anyone hates on him from a playing perspective as much as some fans recognize he was a WR with many flaws who did not handle his departure with class (some will argue I'm sure) playing all out and giving 100%.

                      Personally, I'm glad he is gone and hope that it tempers Ben's always hopefu desire to sling the ball deep for a low probability of success while passing up sure gains short.
                      "My team, may they always be right, but right or wrong...MY TEAM!"

                      Comment

                      • Captain Crunch
                        Backup
                        • Aug 2012
                        • 116

                        #12
                        Wallace will only be missed if someone doesn't step up and be the guy to catch the long ball once or twice a game... Last year he certainly wasn't clutch in the games he needed to be. He really was a "one trick pony", but was very good at that trick. He was a very fast guy that wasn't a polished product. Will he ever develop into a more complete receiver? I guess we'll see what he does in Miami... The fact that he named the WR group "The Young Money Crew" said a lot about him... What is that supposed to mean? What message did he send to management and his team mates with that moniker?

                        Comment

                        • Oviedo
                          Legend
                          • May 2008
                          • 23824

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Captain Crunch
                          Wallace will only be missed if someone doesn't step up and be the guy to catch the long ball once or twice a game... Last year he certainly wasn't clutch in the games he needed to be. He really was a "one trick pony", but was very good at that trick. He was a very fast guy that wasn't a polished product. Will he ever develop into a more complete receiver? I guess we'll see what he does in Miami... The fact that he named the WR group "The Young Money Crew" said a lot about him... What is that supposed to mean? What message did he send to management and his team mates with that moniker?
                          IMO, by the end of his second year Wheaton will make us forget Wallace. Much better receiver in every aspect except maybe the 40 yard dash.
                          "My team, may they always be right, but right or wrong...MY TEAM!"

                          Comment

                          • Eddie Spaghetti
                            Hall of Famer
                            • Jul 2008
                            • 4123

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Oviedo
                            IMO, by the end of his second year Wheaton will make us forget Wallace. Much better receiver in every aspect except maybe the 40 yard dash.
                            why in the world you think that? wheaton hasnt played a single snap in the NFL, while wallace has 4 very solid years on his professional resume.

                            the simple fact is that some fans got extremely butthurt because wallace refused to play for less than his market value. I harbor no ill will towards wallace, unlike some here who have openly wished him to blow out his knee just because he didn't give the steelers a "hometown discount".

                            Comment

                            • Sugar
                              Hall of Famer
                              • Oct 2008
                              • 3700

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Eddie Spaghetti
                              why in the world you think that? wheaton hasnt played a single snap in the NFL, while wallace has 4 very solid years on his professional resume.

                              the simple fact is that some fans got extremely butthurt because wallace refused to play for less than his market value. I harbor no ill will towards wallace, unlike some here who have openly wished him to blow out his knee just because he didn't give the steelers a "hometown discount".
                              It reminds me of all the people that said that Mendy would make us forget Willie Parker because he would be so much better straight out of the draft. While it's nice that Mendy broke the top 10 of Steelers rushers, FWP sits at #3. Wheaton doesn't have to best Wallaces numbers to be useful to this team, but it's silly to predict that a guy that hasn't played an NFL down will be greater than a guy with a real track record of success.

                              Comment

                              Working...