Steelers Takin Unfair Hits

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Steelhere10
    Hall of Famer
    • May 2008
    • 3849

    #16
    Originally posted by D Rock
    Woodley was coming off of 3 great years when he signed his new contract - 13.5, 11.5, and 10 sack seasons, including great performances in the playoffs. The contract he signed was not an issue at the time.

    He came in the next season with his new money and started tearing it up. 9 sacks in the first 8 games, and then the injuries started and have plagued him for the past 1.5 seasons.

    Looking back at that contract as a mistake is silly. At the time it was a great signing. ~10 million a year for one of the league's best sack artists, and a guy with consistent production.

    Pass rushing DE's make more than that. There are 9 DE's with higher average/yr salaries. Woodley is still the 3rd highest average LB, but at the time he was also one of the best and rightly set the market price for a stud pass rushing OLB.

    Don't let the injuries affect the hindsight 20/20 vision with this one. That was a good signing.
    I disagree about Woodley fat boy took the money and ran. He had only one sack in the first four games of that season and then was called out by Tomlin and that's when he decided to play, he then went on to have a couple of two sack games before getting injured that boosted his total to 9. I bet you right now if they had ask Fat boy to take a pay cut this year and if he refuse, NO other team would have gave him no where near a 61 million dollar contract.
    [url=http://img525.imageshack.us/i/steelers2010.jpg/]http://img525.imageshack.us/img525/2...eelers2010.jpg[/url]

    Comment

    • pittpete
      Legend
      • Aug 2008
      • 6825

      #17
      And if the Steelers lowballed Woodley and another team signed him, I bet all the cryers would've been bashing the front office & the organization just like now.
      sigpic

      Comment

      • D Rock
        Hall of Famer
        • Dec 2008
        • 2797

        #18
        Originally posted by Steelhere10
        I disagree about Woodley fat boy took the money and ran. He had only one sack in the first four games of that season and then was called out by Tomlin and that's when he decided to play, he then went on to have a couple of two sack games before getting injured that boosted his total to 9. I bet you right now if they had ask Fat boy to take a pay cut this year and if he refuse, NO other team would have gave him no where near a 61 million dollar contract.

        4 games? that's you sample size? He actually had 1.5 sacks in those 4 games, 1 in week 1 and .5 in week 2. So he had two games without a sack and then went on a tear, and that's what you find issue with?

        Unreal.

        Comment

        • Steelhere10
          Hall of Famer
          • May 2008
          • 3849

          #19
          I find a issue with half azzing it until the coach made public that they need more production from him, but here's the key word AFTER THE BIG PAY DAY!
          [url=http://img525.imageshack.us/i/steelers2010.jpg/]http://img525.imageshack.us/img525/2...eelers2010.jpg[/url]

          Comment

          • BradshawsHairdresser
            Legend
            • Dec 2008
            • 7056

            #20
            Originally posted by supersteeler
            Before Pouncey was drafted the Steelers considered Colon to be their best O-lineman
            I kept hearing that...but from watching the games, honestly, I never could see it. I never saw him being that great at right tackle, and while he may have been starting to come on at guard, how did he ever really show himself to be worthy of big money?

            With Woodley I tend to agree, and was surprised they gave him that much money. My guess is another team would of paid him that amount and the Steelers didn't want to lose a talented OLB.
            Maybe...or maybe the Steelers didn't evaluate well and overpaid. He always seemed to be sort of one-dimensional, more so than Harrison, and IMO, would have been easier to replace.

            The injuries killed him just like many other Steelers, maybe we get a healthy Lamar in 2013 and he's back to form and in shape.
            Hopefully he's gotten the message and is working on it...and isn't the D's version of Colon, good for only a few games a season.

            We need the playmaker Lamar this coming season more than ever, when he's on he's damn good, maybe Woodley earns that big payday in 2013 we sure could use some QB pressure.
            I wonder how much of the "on" Lamarr was the result of better play in front of and around him. In other words, I don't know if he's a guy who can help carry the team as much as a guy who excels only when everyone around him is doing well. Like you, I hope he's the former....because after re-working his contract again, I think we're stuck with him for a few more years.

            Comment

            • BradshawsHairdresser
              Legend
              • Dec 2008
              • 7056

              #21
              Originally posted by D Rock
              Woodley was coming off of 3 great years when he signed his new contract - 13.5, 11.5, and 10 sack seasons, including great performances in the playoffs. The contract he signed was not an issue at the time.

              He came in the next season with his new money and started tearing it up. 9 sacks in the first 8 games, and then the injuries started and have plagued him for the past 1.5 seasons.

              Looking back at that contract as a mistake is silly. At the time it was a great signing. ~10 million a year for one of the league's best sack artists, and a guy with consistent production.

              Pass rushing DE's make more than that. There are 9 DE's with higher average/yr salaries. Woodley is still the 3rd highest average LB, but at the time he was also one of the best and rightly set the market price for a stud pass rushing OLB.

              Don't let the injuries affect the hindsight 20/20 vision with this one. That was a good signing.
              Playing OLB is more than just getting sacks. Is it worth it to pay that big a contract to a one-dimensional LB, who often disappears on the field for long stretches at a time, who tends to begin the season out of shape and out of sync, and expects to play his way into shape? That's what we did with Woodley. Hope he turns it around, but he's got a lot of ground to make up, especially after the past two seasons.

              Comment

              • lloydroid
                Pro Bowler
                • Aug 2012
                • 2026

                #22
                The issue isn't cap management. It's player procurement. If the Steelers have opened themselves to criticism, it's in the draft room, not the boardroom.
                Finally, some mainstream media is admitting/discussing that Pgh has NOT been drafting all that well, even though they arrogantly walk around acting as if they are still the draft gurus. This just in: YOU AIN'T. They have had mostly garbage drafts since 2008.

                Comment

                • Steelhere10
                  Hall of Famer
                  • May 2008
                  • 3849

                  #23
                  Those same media experts swear that the Patriots draft so well but tell me how they draft have been coming the last 5 - 8 years.
                  [url=http://img525.imageshack.us/i/steelers2010.jpg/]http://img525.imageshack.us/img525/2...eelers2010.jpg[/url]

                  Comment

                  • Allegheny ILS
                    Rookie
                    • Mar 2013
                    • 8

                    #24
                    Originally posted by BradshawsHairdresser
                    Ahem...I didn't predict his body would fall apart, but I did say I didn't think it was wise to offer such a large contract to a player who up to that point, in my opinion, had not been all that great.

                    I was also critical of the large deal given to LaMarr Woodley.
                    He was never good enough to get a deal like that to begin with.

                    Comment

                    • squidkid
                      Legend
                      • Feb 2012
                      • 5847

                      #25
                      like i've been saying all along, our drafts have sucked since tomlin become involved
                      steelers = 3 ring circus with tomlin being the head clown

                      Comment

                      • ikestops85
                        Hall of Famer
                        • Jun 2008
                        • 3724

                        #26
                        Originally posted by lloydroid
                        Finally, some mainstream media is admitting/discussing that Pgh has NOT been drafting all that well, even though they arrogantly walk around acting as if they are still the draft gurus. This just in: YOU AIN'T. They have had mostly garbage drafts since 2008.
                        Please show me some evidence of Steeler Front Office or coaches acting arrogant about their draft picks. I have never seen any evidence to confirm that.
                        As many on this site think ... The Rooney's suck, Colbert sucks, Tomlin sucks, the coaches suck, and the players suck.

                        but Go Steelers!!!

                        Comment

                        • Slapstick
                          Rookie
                          • May 2008
                          • 0

                          #27
                          Originally posted by ikestops85
                          Please show me some evidence of Steeler Front Office or coaches acting arrogant about their draft picks. I have never seen any evidence to confirm that.
                          That is what we refer to as a "straw man"...note the irony...
                          Actually, my post was NOT about you...but, if the shoe fits, feel free to lace that &!+€# up and wear it.

                          Comment

                          Working...