Foote Back on Three Year Deal

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • hawaiiansteel
    Legend
    • May 2008
    • 35649

    #76
    Q & A with Larry Foote

    By Josh Newkirk
    GoBlueWolverine.com
    Posted May 16, 2013



    The former U-M linebacker was a guest speaker at NFL HSPD camp in Detroit on Wednesday. GBW caught up with Foote, as he talked about influencing the kids of Detroit, his thoughts on Michigan, Notre Dame dropping the rivalry, his expectations in Pittsburgh next season and more.

    Josh Newkirk: You’re out here at the NFL HSPD camp, what brings you to an event like this?

    Larry Foote: “Just growing up in Detroit, this is a big camp. (Event Manager, Curtis) Blackwell is doing a great job of getting these kids together and bringing the right kids around teaching them the right fundamentals and techniques. And Detroit is full of talent. A lot of guys are coming out of here through football. A lot people think it’s a basketball city, but it’s really a football city. Just by the numbers and talent that’s coming out here year in and year out.”

    Josh Newkirk: Now, I know you played for the Detroit Lions for a season and for the Pittsburgh Steelers for most of your career, but what’s it like coming back and speaking to the kids?

    Larry Foote: “It’s awesome. That’s what got me where I’m at. Older guys that paved the way came back and gave me some wisdom. I’m just proud to give back. It’s just natural. Eventually when I get done (playing in the NFL), hopefully I can be coaching somewhere in the city.”

    Josh Newkirk: Switching up to Michigan, have you been paying attention to the team lately? Also, what are your thoughts on coach Brady Hoke and the job he has done the past two seasons?

    Larry Foote: “It’s building. It’s starting up front. He’s the man that knows the game. You can’t win, if you don’t have the big guys up front. He had a great class this past year with the offensive lineman. The defensive line is getting stacked up. It’s starting from where it counts.”

    Josh Newkirk: You’re paying attention a little bit to the recruiting?

    Larry Foote: “Absolutely!”

    Josh Newkirk: So, you’re noticing that Hoke and coach Greg Mattison are doing work? Even though coach Mattison used to coach against you with the Baltimore Ravens, are you noticing that Mattison is bring back that traditional Michigan defense back to Ann Arbor?

    Larry Foote: “I mean, he set the foundation in the 90s with the defense before he left. Mattison is a great coach. He is one of the greatest coaches in the country. He is doing it the right way. It’s only a matter of time. The other part of it, is guys just need to jump into the program with both feet and start developing like they should. (They should be) living up to the blue chip or whatever ranking they’ve been getting now. Guys just need to start developing.”

    Josh Newkirk: Was it tough for you watching the team struggles through the Rich Rodriguez years? Obviously, it wasn’t the Michigan team you were used to seeing on the field?”

    Larry Foote: “Anytime you’re losing to (Michigan) State or Ohio State, that’s just depressing and terrible. I liked Rich Rod personally. I think he needed better coaches with him. But that philosophy wasn’t working in the Big Ten. That’s just the way it is. But I’m excite what Hoke is doing and hopefully will beat (Michigan) State and Ohio State this year.”

    Josh Newkirk: What do you think about Hoke’s comments on Notre Dame “chickening out” on the rivalry?

    Larry Foote: “It’s true! It’s true! How can you keep Michigan State and Purdue, but not Michigan? Why would you want to do that? It’s from a competition standpoint, why would you want your program to play Purdue and not Michigan, if you had a choice?”

    Josh Newkirk: Since Hoke has come to Ann Arbor, he has called Ohio State—“Ohio”—What do former players in the NFL think of this?

    Larry Foote: “I call them Suckeyes. I call them a whole bunch of names.”

    Josh Newkirk: Is there a whole bunch of banter between former OSU and Michigan players in the league?

    Larry Foote: “Absolutely! Especially in the locker room. We got a couple Ohio State guys. The only Buckeye that I ever liked is Dick LeBeau. He gives it to me all the time. When the big games come up (Steelers coach,)Mike Tomlin will highlight it that Saturday night (with a) speech before we play our game on Sunday. It’s a lot of trash talking. A lot of money gets exchanged, pushups, dinners, all types of stuff.”

    Josh Newkirk: What are you expectations of Michigan going forward this season?

    Larry Foote: “Well, young guys need to step up. (Devin Gardner) is one of them I am talking about. He needs to step up. He needs to own his position. He needs to be the man. If he don’t do it, then it’s only so far we can go. I don’t care what kind of lineman or guys are around him. He took some steps (last season.) He showed some signs for me to be excited this year. But we all know quarterback will take you. So hopefully he is doing his stuff this off-season to be the man.”

    Josh Newkirk: What about Michigan’s linebackers, is there anyone that sticks out to you?

    Larry Foote: “James Ross, he was a (Detroit little league) West side Cub, he is one of my young protégés. I have known him since he was knee high. I’m excited about lot of guys. It was a big blow when Jake Ryan got hurt. He was showing signs like he can be an NFL player. That’s going to be a big blow. But we got young Royce Jenkins-Stone. I’m comfortable with our linebackers position.”

    Josh Newkirk: Lastly, what are your expectations for the Steelers? You guys didn’t make the playoffs last year. So what are you guys doing this off-season to get back to where you guys are normally—and that’s in playoffs?

    Larry Foote: “We’re pissed off we didn’t make the playoffs. On top of that, our rival won the Super Bowl. I know guys are taking it personally. It’s just a whole different mindset to the off-season. I know guys are ready to get back where we need to be.”

    [URL]http://michigan.scout.com/2/1292242.html[/URL]

    Comment

    • flippy
      Legend
      • Dec 2008
      • 17088

      #77
      Originally posted by hawaiiansteel

      Larry Foote: “We’re pissed off we didn’t make the playoffs. On top of that, our rival won the Super Bowl. I know guys are taking it personally. It’s just a whole different mindset to the off-season. I know guys are ready to get back where we need to be.”

      [URL]http://michigan.scout.com/2/1292242.html[/URL]
      Hope Larry's right.
      sigpic

      Comment

      • skyhawk
        Hall of Famer
        • Dec 2008
        • 3732

        #78
        Originally posted by SteelerOfDeVille
        yup... foote was a weak link on an excellent defense. Connor was the weak link on a BAD defense... let's just hope for an ILB in the draft... or that Spence recovers quickly this summer...
        I don't get all the hate for Foote on this board. It was just the same hate for Farrior before he retired. Foote arguably had his best year last year on a great defense, and he's the weak link? Gimme a break, he leads the team with 113 tackles and has a career best 4 sacks.

        The guy is NEVER HURT, never complains, and has played solid his entire career with the Steelers. You know what you are getting with Foote. Now, him NOT being signed would be a surprise to me.

        Sometimes I have to shake my head on the hate for Foote (and Farrior in his last two years) on this board. Are we watching the same players here?

        Comment

        • flippy
          Legend
          • Dec 2008
          • 17088

          #79
          Originally posted by skyhawk
          I don't get all the hate for Foote on this board. It was just the same hate for Farrior before he retired. Foote arguably had his best year last year on a great defense, and he's the weak link? Gimme a break, he leads the team with 113 tackles and has a career best 4 sacks.

          The guy is NEVER HURT, never complains, and has played solid his entire career with the Steelers. You know what you are getting with Foote. Now, him NOT being signed would be a surprise to me.

          Sometimes I have to shake my head on the hate for Foote (and Farrior in his last two years) on this board. Are we watching the same players here?
          I've loved Foote since the day we drafted him and always felt he was underrated. He started getting some respect about the time we drafted Timmy to replace him and then fans soured on him again.

          He is what he is. He's not big. He's not fast. But he always seems to be the smartest guy on the field and always in the right spot. I wish more guys played like him.
          sigpic

          Comment

          • Big Ern McCracken
            Backup
            • Mar 2013
            • 130

            #80
            Originally posted by flippy
            I've loved Foote since the day we drafted him and always felt he was underrated. He started getting some respect about the time we drafted Timmy to replace him and then fans soured on him again.

            He is what he is. He's not big. He's not fast. But he always seems to be the smartest guy on the field and always in the right spot. I wish more guys played like him.
            Exactly!!!! a quick phrase or two to describe Larry Foote... he a football player. Tough as nails, and has a nose for the football.

            Comment

            • NorthCoast
              Legend
              • Sep 2008
              • 26636

              #81
              Steeler fans consistently undervalue Foote. He is smart and usually in position to make a play. Won't make the highlight reel with jawbreaking tackles but knows the defense well and gets them to play together.
              More than adequate replacement for Farrior. Consider:

              Farrior in his final season: 54 tackles, 24 assists
              Foote in 2012: 75 tackles, 38 assists

              Comment

              • ikestops85
                Hall of Famer
                • Jun 2008
                • 3724

                #82
                Originally posted by skyhawk
                I don't get all the hate for Foote on this board. It was just the same hate for Farrior before he retired. Foote arguably had his best year last year on a great defense, and he's the weak link? Gimme a break, he leads the team with 113 tackles and has a career best 4 sacks.

                The guy is NEVER HURT, never complains, and has played solid his entire career with the Steelers. You know what you are getting with Foote. Now, him NOT being signed would be a surprise to me.

                Sometimes I have to shake my head on the hate for Foote (and Farrior in his last two years) on this board. Are we watching the same players here?
                Don't you know that you are either a superstar of dogcrap in the eyes of Steeler fans. A lot of them don't recognize solid football players. Farrior got beat by Ray Rice on a key 4th down play and from then on he was useless according to many fans. Many here didn't like the job Ryan Clark was doing until last year when he took over Troy's position for 6 or 7 games and he made big hits and some splash plays. Then, and only then, did Clark start getting some respect.

                Foote is one of those glue type players who help hold the team together. He is a good solid player and he won't be as easy to replace as some think.
                As many on this site think ... The Rooney's suck, Colbert sucks, Tomlin sucks, the coaches suck, and the players suck.

                but Go Steelers!!!

                Comment

                • skyhawk
                  Hall of Famer
                  • Dec 2008
                  • 3732

                  #83
                  I guess we are spoiled. Foote and Clark have the best years of their careers in 2012 and the sky is falling!

                  Comment

                  • SteelCrazy
                    Legend
                    • Aug 2008
                    • 5049

                    #84
                    Foote only had 133 tackles last year. Totally useless!
                    2019 Mock

                    1. ILB
                    2. CB
                    3. ILB
                    4. S
                    5. CB
                    6. ILB
                    7. S

                    Comment

                    • skyhawk
                      Hall of Famer
                      • Dec 2008
                      • 3732

                      #85
                      Originally posted by SteelCrazy
                      Foote only had 133 tackles last year. Totally useless!
                      113 according to nfl.com. But you're right! Totally useless!

                      Comment

                      • SteelerOfDeVille
                        Legend
                        • May 2008
                        • 9069

                        #86
                        to put that in perspective, Rey Maualuga had 122... you can't just use numbers... My problem with the LBs is that the team doesn't have a run-stuffer any more.

                        On Farrior's last season, NorthCoast, he didn't play 16. Those stats are Apples and Oranges...

                        Foote is "solid". I expect excellence from the LBs. Just one man's opionion.
                        2013 MNF Executive Champion!

                        Comment

                        • ikestops85
                          Hall of Famer
                          • Jun 2008
                          • 3724

                          #87
                          Originally posted by SteelerOfDeVille
                          to put that in perspective, Rey Maualuga had 122... you can't just use numbers... My problem with the LBs is that the team doesn't have a run-stuffer any more.

                          On Farrior's last season, NorthCoast, he didn't play 16. Those stats are Apples and Oranges...

                          Foote is "solid". I expect excellence from the LBs. Just one man's opionion.
                          While you might "expect" excellence you can't afford excellence. It just isn't possible to pay 4 excellent linebackers and still field a competitive team. Almost all teams have their share of superstars but the teams that win consistently are the ones that field more "solid" players than weak ones.

                          ... but like you this is just one man's opinion.
                          As many on this site think ... The Rooney's suck, Colbert sucks, Tomlin sucks, the coaches suck, and the players suck.

                          but Go Steelers!!!

                          Comment

                          • hawaiiansteel
                            Legend
                            • May 2008
                            • 35649

                            #88
                            Larry Foote: Steelers should have gone 12-4

                            Posted by Michael David Smith on June 10, 2013



                            The Steelers went 8-8 last season, but four of those eight losses were by a field goal. And that has Steelers linebacker Larry Foote thinking about what might have been.

                            Foote told the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review that he thinks the Steelers were good enough to be a 12-4 team because those close losses were games they should have won.

                            “Four games we should have won. Do that, and we’re 12-4, but that’s how the league goes,” Foote said. “The year before, we made the playoffs and we could have lost four games. The bottom line is we lost some games that we should have won and we didn’t.”

                            Of course, every team in the NFL that missed the playoffs last year could look back at a few close losses and say those were games they should have won. And the Steelers also could have lost most of the games they won: Five of their eight wins were by seven points or less.

                            Ultimately, however many games the Steelers “should have won,” eight is the number they did win. And that’s what matters.

                            [URL]http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/06/10/larry-foote-steelers-should-have-gone-12-4/[/URL]

                            Comment

                            • Slapstick
                              Rookie
                              • May 2008
                              • 0

                              #89
                              Originally posted by hawaiiansteel
                              Ultimately, however many games the Steelers “should have won,” eight is the number they did win. And that’s what matters.
                              Does this somehow contradict what Larry Foote said?
                              Actually, my post was NOT about you...but, if the shoe fits, feel free to lace that &!+€# up and wear it.

                              Comment

                              • SteelerOfDeVille
                                Legend
                                • May 2008
                                • 9069

                                #90
                                Originally posted by ikestops85
                                While you might "expect" excellence you can't afford excellence. It just isn't possible to pay 4 excellent linebackers and still field a competitive team. Almost all teams have their share of superstars but the teams that win consistently are the ones that field more "solid" players than weak ones.

                                ... but like you this is just one man's opinion.
                                missed this a month ago.. but, san fran is... just sayin'
                                2013 MNF Executive Champion!

                                Comment

                                Working...