Truth of the matter with WR in 2012

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • feltdizz
    Legend
    • May 2008
    • 27532

    #16
    Originally posted by RuthlessBurgher
    Yeah, no kidding...Plaxico will turn THIRTY-SIX during training camp. He caught all of THREE PASSES this season (and only one catch in games that meant anything). Yeah...he's the answer. For those who lament Mike Wallace's attitude, do you forget that Plaxico's attitude was worse back when he was 26?
    a bullet, jail cell and time changed all that. Plax isn't the answer but he is a short term solution.

    ..and Brown may have cost us a game or made some mental errors but it wasn't from a lack of trying. Brown has a few things to clean up but a bad attitude isn't one of them.
    Steelers 27
    Rats 16

    Comment

    • ikestops85
      Hall of Famer
      • Jun 2008
      • 3724

      #17
      Originally posted by RuthlessBurgher
      Yeah, no kidding...Plaxico will turn THIRTY-SIX during training camp. He caught all of THREE PASSES this season (and only one catch in games that meant anything). Yeah...he's the answer. For those who lament Mike Wallace's attitude, do you forget that Plaxico's attitude was worse back when he was 26?
      I don't think Plaxico is the answer or better than Wallace. I do think he could teach Wallace a couple of things that would make Mike a better receiver. How to draw a pass interference being one of them.

      While Burress only caught 3 passes I think he was responsible for 3 touchdowns. Given he was rarely on the field I think that he has a great ratio of plays to steeler touchdowns.
      As many on this site think ... The Rooney's suck, Colbert sucks, Tomlin sucks, the coaches suck, and the players suck.

      but Go Steelers!!!

      Comment

      • lloydroid
        Pro Bowler
        • Aug 2012
        • 2026

        #18
        Originally posted by phillyesq
        I hate to break it to you, but there is no world in which Plaxico Burress now is a better WR than Wallace.

        Wallace had an awful year and will probably be overpaid, but his departure leaves the Steelers with a below average group of WRs and another hole that needs to be filled.
        When is there an off season when a player leaving DOESN'T leave a hole at some position? It is the norm. Adjust, adapt, make it happen. Deal with it. Oh, and as much as Wallace played like a wet fart, he created a hole BY PLAYING in Pgh last season. We will be better without him. Watch and see.
        Last edited by lloydroid; 01-15-2013, 04:13 PM.

        Comment

        • lloydroid
          Pro Bowler
          • Aug 2012
          • 2026

          #19
          Originally posted by feltdizz
          a bullet, jail cell and time changed all that. Plax isn't the answer but he is a short term solution.

          ..and Brown may have cost us a game or made some mental errors but it wasn't from a lack of trying. Brown has a few things to clean up but a bad attitude isn't one of them.
          Brown will be better when his "young $" buddy is gone. But let's not forget the image of Brown just standing there, looking at the football in the end zone, and not bothering to bend over or fall on it, costing us a TD vs. SD, in a game that we lost. That certainly ___WAS___ an example of him not bothering to give any effort, for sure.

          Comment

          • phillyesq
            Legend
            • May 2008
            • 7568

            #20
            Originally posted by lloydroid
            When is their an off season when a player leaving DOESN'T leave a hole at some position? It is the norm. Adjust, adapt, make it happen. Deal with it. Oh, and as much as Wallace played like a wet fart, he created a hole BY PLAYING in Pgh last season. We will be better without him. Watch and see.
            Typically the Steelers try to groom a backup plan. When Aaron Smith left, Ziggy stepped in. When Keisel goes, Heyward will step in. Foote taking over for Farrior.

            There are holes that occur becuase of age and you cannot prevent those. Wallace is a younger player and that is the difference.

            Again, I was as displeased with his play as anybody this year, but his departure will weaken the team.

            Comment

            • Slapstick
              Rookie
              • May 2008
              • 0

              #21
              Originally posted by lloydroid
              Brown will be better when his "young $" buddy is gone. But let's not forget the image of Brown just standing there, looking at the football in the end zone, and not bothering to bend over or fall on it, costing us a TD vs. SD, in a game that we lost. That certainly ___WAS___ an example of him not bothering to give any effort, for sure.
              That wasn't a lack of effort...that was just being dumb...

              When there is a loose football, just fall on it...he was so sure that it was an incomplete forward pass that he stupidly let it roll around in our endzone...

              Brown works plenty hard and gives fantastic effort...now, he needs to play smarter...
              Actually, my post was NOT about you...but, if the shoe fits, feel free to lace that &!+€# up and wear it.

              Comment

              • papillon
                Legend
                • Mar 2008
                • 11340

                #22
                Originally posted by phillyesq
                Typically the Steelers try to groom a backup plan. When Aaron Smith left, Ziggy stepped in. When Keisel goes, Heyward will step in. Foote taking over for Farrior.

                There are holes that occur because of age and you cannot prevent those. Wallace is a younger player and that is the difference.

                Again, I was as displeased with his play as anybody this year, but his departure will weaken the team.
                The Steelers replaced Plax in his prime and continued to succeed, the Steelers replaced Santonio Holmes in his prime and continue to succeed and they'll replace Wallace in his prime and continue to succeed who isn't as good (IMO) as either Plax or Holmes in their primes. Because of changes in the game colleges are grooming more and more receivers for the NFL. Finding a replacement for Mike Wallace shouldn't be to tall of an order, he isn't in the caliber of Fitz, Johnson (Andre and Calvin), Jones (Julio), Green (AJ), White (Roddy), etc all of those guys go and high point the ball something Wallace can't or won't do. The 3rd or 4th round will probably produce Wallace's replacement.

                Pappy
                sigpic

                The 2025 Pittsburgh Steeler draft

                1.21 - Derrick Harmon, DT, Oregon - Nick Emmanwori, S, S. Carolina
                3.83 - Kaleb Johnson, RB, Iowa - DJ Giddens, RB, Kans St
                3.123 - Will Howard, QB, OSU
                4.156 - JJ Pegues, DT, Ole Miss
                5.185 - Clay Webb, OG, Jack St
                7.229 - Tyrion Ingram-Dawkins, DT, Georgia

                "Football is a physical game, well, it used to be anyways" - Mel Blount

                Comment

                • lloydroid
                  Pro Bowler
                  • Aug 2012
                  • 2026

                  #23
                  Originally posted by Slapstick
                  That wasn't a lack of effort...that was just being dumb...

                  When there is a loose football, just fall on it...he was so sure that it was an incomplete forward pass that he stupidly let it roll around in our endzone...

                  Brown works plenty hard and gives fantastic effort...now, he needs to play smarter...
                  Being dumb is often the result of lacking effort or bothering to give a damn. When you aren't focused, you do dumb things. I threw my pool-cleaning robot in the water instead of "placing" it in the pool. It didn't break, but it could have. My wife asked me, "Why did you do that?" and I said, "I was just being stupid." Had I been paying more attention, I would not have done that. If I am playing in an NFL game, I would be paying attention the entire game; I don't know how you can just not pay attention with the stakes being so high. It doesn't make sense. Brown was not paying attention. Not acceptable.

                  Comment

                  • lloydroid
                    Pro Bowler
                    • Aug 2012
                    • 2026

                    #24
                    Originally posted by phillyesq
                    Typically the Steelers try to groom a backup plan. When Aaron Smith left, Ziggy stepped in. When Keisel goes, Heyward will step in. Foote taking over for Farrior.

                    There are holes that occur becuase of age and you cannot prevent those. Wallace is a younger player and that is the difference.

                    Again, I was as displeased with his play as anybody this year, but his departure will weaken the team.
                    There is far more to the quality of a team than merely the collection of talent. Chemistry is everything. Without it, no level of talent makes up for it, and MW was a chemistry destroyer last year. Him leaving will be a case of addition through subtraction. Watch and learn.

                    Comment

                    • JUST-PLAIN-NASTY
                      Hall of Famer
                      • May 2008
                      • 3937

                      #25
                      Although we all BELIEVE defense will be hot & heavy early we know the Steelers could do the opposite if Wallace leaves and target a WR. It would not surprise me in the very least that the Steelers are 100% confident in their previous drafts & UDFA on this team to fill the holes on defense in 2013 and maybe even after. I didn't say I agree with it....But they are the ones that know best.

                      If Wallace leaves & they don't sign Burress...Don't be surprised when the Steelers are on the clock a "Trade" is announced where the Steelers move down...And they end up taking Cordarrelle Patterson. I said it...I'm sure many won't like it...But he takes care of your #3 immediately & your KR/PR. I would say there is no reason to think he couldn't be your X as soon as the start of the season if he picks up the spot.

                      Comment

                      • skyhawk
                        Hall of Famer
                        • Dec 2008
                        • 3732

                        #26
                        Yancy Thigpen, Ernie Mills, and Andre Hastings were a better stable of WRs than we have now.

                        Comment

                        • phillyesq
                          Legend
                          • May 2008
                          • 7568

                          #27
                          Originally posted by papillon
                          The Steelers replaced Plax in his prime and continued to succeed, the Steelers replaced Santonio Holmes in his prime and continue to succeed and they'll replace Wallace in his prime and continue to succeed who isn't as good (IMO) as either Plax or Holmes in their primes. Because of changes in the game colleges are grooming more and more receivers for the NFL. Finding a replacement for Mike Wallace shouldn't be to tall of an order, he isn't in the caliber of Fitz, Johnson (Andre and Calvin), Jones (Julio), Green (AJ), White (Roddy), etc all of those guys go and high point the ball something Wallace can't or won't do. The 3rd or 4th round will probably produce Wallace's replacement.

                          Pappy
                          I'm not saying that Wallace is not replaceable. He is. But having to replace him is one more pick that can't be used on another area of need. And there is nobody waiting in the wings.

                          Even if the Steelers find a great replacement in the draft, he is not likely to be productive until at least year 2. Using the examples above, Santonio and Plaxico were both awful as rookies. Holmes cost the team a few games with his gaffes before winning the meaningless season finale with a late TD. The most productive rookie WR this year was TY Hilton - none of the rest made significant contributions.

                          This is a setback for the offense, even if tempoarary, and it takes awya from another resource on the field.

                          Comment

                          • phillyesq
                            Legend
                            • May 2008
                            • 7568

                            #28
                            Originally posted by skyhawk
                            Yancy Thigpen, Ernie Mills, and Andre Hastings were a better stable of WRs than we have now.
                            Don't forget Charles Johnson and, at times, Slash. That was a really solid group.

                            Comment

                            • phillyesq
                              Legend
                              • May 2008
                              • 7568

                              #29
                              Originally posted by lloydroid
                              Watch and learn.
                              GTH. I'm not going to be lectured by the board clown.

                              Comment

                              • papillon
                                Legend
                                • Mar 2008
                                • 11340

                                #30
                                Originally posted by phillyesq
                                I'm not saying that Wallace is not replaceable. He is. But having to replace him is one more pick that can't be used on another area of need. And there is nobody waiting in the wings.

                                Even if the Steelers find a great replacement in the draft, he is not likely to be productive until at least year 2. Using the examples above, Santonio and Plaxico were both awful as rookies. Holmes cost the team a few games with his gaffes before winning the meaningless season finale with a late TD. The most productive rookie WR this year was TY Hilton - none of the rest made significant contributions.

                                This is a setback for the offense, even if temporary, and it takes away from another resource on the field.
                                I agree with you 100% and it would be better if they don't have to use a pick to replace Wallace. Hopefully, only a temporary setback, but the good news is that Ben has managed throughout his career to get by using average to slightly above average and one HOF receiver and being successful. But, if they can find his replacement where they found him (3rd I think) it wouldn't be a horrible waste of resource. We'll see where this takes the Steelers once free agency can start and the offers start heading Wallace's way.

                                Pappy
                                sigpic

                                The 2025 Pittsburgh Steeler draft

                                1.21 - Derrick Harmon, DT, Oregon - Nick Emmanwori, S, S. Carolina
                                3.83 - Kaleb Johnson, RB, Iowa - DJ Giddens, RB, Kans St
                                3.123 - Will Howard, QB, OSU
                                4.156 - JJ Pegues, DT, Ole Miss
                                5.185 - Clay Webb, OG, Jack St
                                7.229 - Tyrion Ingram-Dawkins, DT, Georgia

                                "Football is a physical game, well, it used to be anyways" - Mel Blount

                                Comment

                                Working...