Torey Smith > Mike Wallace

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SidSmythe
    Hall of Famer
    • Sep 2008
    • 4708

    Torey Smith > Mike Wallace

    After Torey Smith's rookie year I told my RAVEN buddy that Torey Smith would become a better WR than Mike Wallace.
    This week I texted him "I told you Torey Smith would be better than Mike Wallace"

    He burned Champ Bailey in the 1st Quarter using his deep speed, now he goes up to the highest point and catches a lob over Bailey.

    Before we give that girl Wallace big money, lets wait for Torey Smith to hit the market and throw the money at him.
    Here We Go Steelers, Here We Go...
    Here We Go Steelers, Here We Go...
    Here We Go Steelers, Here We Go...!!!
  • NJ-STEELER
    Legend
    • May 2008
    • 12563

    #2
    wait 2 years to improve the receiving corps?

    Comment

    • SidSmythe
      Hall of Famer
      • Sep 2008
      • 4708

      #3
      Originally posted by NJ-STEELER
      wait 2 years to improve the receiving corps?
      Didn't say that. But I'm all for drafting someone this year and then stealing Smith from the Ravens!!
      Here We Go Steelers, Here We Go...
      Here We Go Steelers, Here We Go...
      Here We Go Steelers, Here We Go...!!!

      Comment

      • SteelBucks
        Legend
        • Aug 2008
        • 8075

        #4
        He's making Flacco look good that's for sure.

        Comment

        • Mister Pittsburgh
          Hall of Famer
          • Jul 2008
          • 3674

          #5
          Eric Decker is high pointing the ball over DB's & Demarius Thomas is as well. We need at least one big physical WR that can high point a ball and catch the thing with his hands over a DB. Our WR corp is totally unphysical. Anquan Boldin is clutch as well.
          Last edited by Mister Pittsburgh; 01-12-2013, 09:01 PM.
          @_Hellgrammite

          Comment

          • supersteeler
            Pro Bowler
            • Dec 2012
            • 1089

            #6
            I don't believe you have to have big physical receveirs to have success. Remember the Marks brothers? Clayton&Duper from the Dolphins 5-9 and 5-10 also Gary Clark of the Skins. All smurfs by todays standards but its not the size as everyone thinks.
            Our receiver corps was pretty good before this season, I think the change in the offense had something to do with their sub-par year. If you want eight yd pass plays bring back Hines, Brown and Wallace are better suited for the longer pass plays.

            I do agree we could get better blocking from our receivers something that was missing since Hines retired, then again no one blocked like Hines ward.
            sigpic

            Comment

            • Shoe
              Hall of Famer
              • May 2008
              • 4044

              #7
              Why would we want Torrey Smith? Receivers come and go every year... we don't want Raven players coming here, just as much as we don't want Steeler players going over there. It's a rivalry. Swapping guys like it's nothing devalues the whole thing.
              I wasn't hired for my disposition.

              Comment

              • Chadman
                Legend
                • May 2008
                • 6537

                #8
                Steelers can't afford 2 WR's paid to be #1's.

                Besides, the Haley offense would waste Torrey Smith as much as it wasted Wallace.

                Best off drafting T.O. Part 2- a guy that can go across the middle, then shrug off defenders as best he can to make extra yards. That's our offense now.
                The people that are trying to make the world worse never take a day off, why should I?

                Light up the darkness.

                Comment

                • Mister Pittsburgh
                  Hall of Famer
                  • Jul 2008
                  • 3674

                  #9
                  Originally posted by supersteeler
                  I don't believe you have to have big physical receveirs to have success. Remember the Marks brothers? Clayton&Duper from the Dolphins 5-9 and 5-10 also Gary Clark of the Skins. All smurfs by todays standards but its not the size as everyone thinks.
                  Our receiver corps was pretty good before this season, I think the change in the offense had something to do with their sub-par year. If you want eight yd pass plays bring back Hines, Brown and Wallace are better suited for the longer pass plays.

                  I do agree we could get better blocking from our receivers something that was missing since Hines retired, then again no one blocked like Hines ward.
                  Yes of course you don't need big WR. For the offense we run a bigger WR would fit better though and bring more to the table then a small non-physical WR brings. With all small WR you should spread teams out. We don't do that. We do the opposite of that.
                  @_Hellgrammite

                  Comment

                  • jj28west
                    Starter
                    • Dec 2008
                    • 784

                    #10
                    Wondering if Bowe was effective in Haley's offense in KC

                    Comment

                    • supersteeler
                      Pro Bowler
                      • Dec 2012
                      • 1089

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Mister Pittsburgh
                      Yes of course you don't need big WR. For the offense we run a bigger WR would fit better though and bring more to the table then a small non-physical WR brings. With all small WR you should spread teams out. We don't do that. We do the opposite of that.

                      Exactly, that why I hope the Steelers consider Randy Fitz for OC, he knows how to run that offense and Ben will elevate his play and the receivers as well.
                      sigpic

                      Comment

                      • Mister Pittsburgh
                        Hall of Famer
                        • Jul 2008
                        • 3674

                        #12
                        Originally posted by supersteeler
                        Exactly, that why I hope the Steelers consider Randy Fitz for OC, he knows how to run that offense and Ben will elevate his play and the receivers as well.
                        If you really think the OC decides the type of offense we run you are wrong.
                        @_Hellgrammite

                        Comment

                        • lloydroid
                          Pro Bowler
                          • Aug 2012
                          • 2026

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Mister Pittsburgh
                          Eric Decker is high pointing the ball over DB's & Demarius Thomas is as well. We need at least one big physical WR that can high point a ball and catch the thing with his hands over a DB. Our WR corp is totally unphysical. Anquan Boldin is clutch as well.
                          I thought that was Plex's forte?

                          Comment

                          • SteelBucks
                            Legend
                            • Aug 2008
                            • 8075

                            #14
                            Originally posted by lloydroid
                            I thought that was Plex's forte?
                            Plax is "big" minus the "physical". I'd like to have him back though for another season.

                            Comment

                            • costanza2k1
                              Hall of Famer
                              • Mar 2008
                              • 2579

                              #15
                              I think we need to look for a WR that can catch the ball with his hands not his body, someone who will fight for the ball, someone who will secure the ball after the catch...we're pretty much in back to basics mode. Interesting perspective by Chadman
                              ours is not to wonder why just invert and multiply...

                              Comment

                              Working...