Steelers cut Rainey...

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Djfan
    Legend
    • May 2008
    • 5184

    #31
    Was I the only one not impressed by him? He had flashes, but he didn't seem to be able to get past the one hit at times. Sorry about his demons, but not worried about the player loss too much.
    Steel City Mafia
    So Cal Boss (Ret)
    [URL]http://www.anewsong.com[/URL]

    Comment

    • hawaiiansteel
      Legend
      • May 2008
      • 35649

      #32
      Originally posted by Djfan
      Was I the only one not impressed by him? He had flashes, but he didn't seem to be able to get past the one hit at times. Sorry about his demons, but not worried about the player loss too much.
      I'm probably not going to lose too much sleep about losing our 4th string RB either...

      Comment

      • feltdizz
        Legend
        • May 2008
        • 27531

        #33
        Originally posted by Shoe
        Oh, don't get it twisted--it is a moral thing. He wasn't cut due to his lack of performance on the field. You're right in the sense that, if he showed the potential of a young Marshall Faulk, he would still be on the Steelers. But don't downplay the moral stance the team is taking here. Rainey has talent. He is probably one of the 5 or 10 fastest players in the league... and he converts it on to the field. The team cutting him is no small sacrifice.

        I know the bottom line is wins and losses, but I'm glad the team I root for places a premium on guys who act right.
        ...and yet, we have Harrison who smacked his baby mama, Ben and his drama, Plax and his gun wound and countless video of him cursing out Coughlin, Mendenhall and his issues, Tamu on the practice squad and God knows how many other infractions that have been kept in house.

        I love my Steelers but I'm not too far gone to believe we have a moral high ground. We keep drafting players who get in trouble...
        Last edited by feltdizz; 01-10-2013, 09:45 PM.
        Steelers 27
        Rats 16

        Comment

        • feltdizz
          Legend
          • May 2008
          • 27531

          #34
          Originally posted by Djfan
          Was I the only one not impressed by him? He had flashes, but he didn't seem to be able to get past the one hit at times. Sorry about his demons, but not worried about the player loss too much.
          If the ST's didn't draw so many penalties I think you would mid him. The only reason you weren't impressed is because we failed to use him correctly on the flats.
          Steelers 27
          Rats 16

          Comment

          • Eddie Spaghetti
            Hall of Famer
            • Jul 2008
            • 4123

            #35
            I will miss him.

            had a chance to be dynamic.

            Comment

            • DBR96A
              Backup
              • Feb 2012
              • 469

              #36
              Hey, is this where we complain about the "inconsistency" of the front office and fail to consider a player's replaceability as a factor?
              sigpic
              Pittsburgh, PA: City of Champions.

              Comment

              • Djfan
                Legend
                • May 2008
                • 5184

                #37
                Originally posted by feltdizz
                If the ST's didn't draw so many penalties I think you would mid him. The only reason you weren't impressed is because we failed to use him correctly on the flats.
                That may be. I say let him find his career somewhere else, and best of luck to him. Next.
                Steel City Mafia
                So Cal Boss (Ret)
                [URL]http://www.anewsong.com[/URL]

                Comment

                • lloydroid
                  Pro Bowler
                  • Aug 2012
                  • 2026

                  #38
                  Originally posted by ruthlessburgher
                  just barely...

                  lmmfao.....

                  Comment

                  • Shoe
                    Hall of Famer
                    • May 2008
                    • 4044

                    #39
                    Originally posted by hawaiiansteel
                    and yet Ta'amu is still on the Steelers' roster, how do you explain that?
                    I don't. But that doesn't mean I'm not right. A family can have a deadbeat, loser, @s$h01e in their family. It doesn't make the whole family a piece of $h1+.
                    I wasn't hired for my disposition.

                    Comment

                    • Crash
                      Legend
                      • Apr 2009
                      • 5008

                      #40
                      I think Ta'amu's playing future isn't guaranteed. I think they are just trying to help him deal with his booze issues.

                      It's called compassion. From what I hear he's also willing to get help and going to meetings.

                      Comment

                      • SidSmythe
                        Hall of Famer
                        • Sep 2008
                        • 4708

                        #41
                        Originally posted by hawaiiansteel
                        and yet Ta'amu is still on the Steelers' roster, how do you explain that?
                        This is Rainey's 2nd incident. This was Ta'amu's first.
                        Here We Go Steelers, Here We Go...
                        Here We Go Steelers, Here We Go...
                        Here We Go Steelers, Here We Go...!!!

                        Comment

                        • Crash
                          Legend
                          • Apr 2009
                          • 5008

                          #42
                          Ta'amu had issues with booze in college.

                          Comment

                          • hawaiiansteel
                            Legend
                            • May 2008
                            • 35649

                            #43
                            Originally posted by SidSmythe
                            This is Rainey's 2nd incident. This was Ta'amu's first.
                            no, it's not.

                            this was Ta'amu's 2nd DUI in a span of a couple of years.

                            Comment

                            • thor75
                              Pro Bowler
                              • Dec 2012
                              • 1038

                              #44
                              I would blame these offenses on them being young and immature, but Hines had a DUI last year too. Tough to know the FO's line or justification for players being released. It is a little hazy. I don't want to be the Pittsburgh choir boys but I don't want concertina wire scars under their jerseys either.
                              1. C.J. Mosley LB Alabama
                              2. Jordan Matthews WR Vanderbilt
                              3. (comp) Philip Gaines CB Rice
                              4. Arthur Lynch TE Georgia
                              5. Ross Cockrell CB Duke
                              5. (comp) Derrick Hopkins DT Virginia Tech
                              6. Josh Mauro DE Stanford
                              6. (comp) Shaquil Barrett OLB Colorado State
                              7. Quincy Enunwa WR Nebraska

                              Comment

                              • hawaiiansteel
                                Legend
                                • May 2008
                                • 35649

                                #45
                                Originally posted by feltdizz
                                it's not a good look to chase a woman down with her purse in hand... but it's Florida, she may have moves.
                                I wonder if Rainey fumbled his phone and his gf was just getting it for him?

                                Comment

                                Working...