Good article on Plax, coaching, etc

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Slapstick
    Rookie
    • May 2008
    • 0

    #16
    If Ben likes him, he can make the occasional catch and he's cheap, why not? As a #4 WR, he'd be a mismatch for whomever would cover him...or, he'd draw a better CB and create a mismatch elsewhere...
    Actually, my post was NOT about you...but, if the shoe fits, feel free to lace that &!+€# up and wear it.

    Comment

    • skyhawk
      Hall of Famer
      • Dec 2008
      • 3732

      #17
      A #4 receiver? I believe he can be much higher than that. Sanders is better than Burress? I think us Steeler fans overrate our receiving corps. It needs to be addressed in the draft this year.

      Comment

      • skyhawk
        Hall of Famer
        • Dec 2008
        • 3732

        #18
        Originally posted by Mister Pittsburgh
        This! They want to run this all control offense with 3 yard runs and the chain moving pass designs but then have small framed speed receivers that can't get separation off the LOS, run poor routes, don't block we'll for one another or for the RB half the time, and have made some killer mistakes that have thwarted some huge drives.

        We had Plax outside but I would play him in the slot with Brown outside.
        TOTALLY THIS!!

        Our receivers cannot get open and run routes and create separation. It's one of the reasons Ben holds the ball so long.

        Comment

        • feltdizz
          Legend
          • May 2008
          • 27532

          #19
          Not even a Burress fan but it was stupid to have him out vs Cincy in a must win game. Unlike the other WR's Plax knows how to draw a PI flag. I don't care if he;s old and slow... he is valuable in the red zone and we STINK in the red zone.
          Steelers 27
          Rats 16

          Comment

          • Chadman
            Legend
            • May 2008
            • 6537

            #20
            Given that Haley plays the dink & dunk offense, and there are so many short to medium WR routes, separation just won't happen all the time. This is why a big-bodied guy like Burress is valuable, because even when he's covered, he's open due to his height. Reckon we'd be surprised how much Ben would look Plex's way...
            The people that are trying to make the world worse never take a day off, why should I?

            Light up the darkness.

            Comment

            • Sugar
              Hall of Famer
              • Oct 2008
              • 3700

              #21
              Originally posted by skyhawk
              Sanders is better than Burress?
              At this point? Yes. Yes, he is.

              Comment

              • skyhawk
                Hall of Famer
                • Dec 2008
                • 3732

                #22
                Short to medium routes? What routes? There is very little timing in this offense. The loss of Hines Ward is bigger than people think (although last year he didn't contribute much). I would also tend to think that Holmes was a more phyical receiver and able to run routes better than what we have now.

                This is a majpr passing league now. With Ben, these receivers should be doing more. But they clearly are not. Is that Haley's fault? I am not sure. Going through the motions and completing the few pass that are made is irrelevant if this team can't score points. That is the issue. Points.
                Last edited by skyhawk; 01-02-2013, 10:52 PM.

                Comment

                • skyhawk
                  Hall of Famer
                  • Dec 2008
                  • 3732

                  #23
                  Originally posted by Sugar
                  At this point? Yes. Yes, he is.
                  Ha, Steeler cool-aid? I think if Burress is worked into the mix more he would be more productive than Sanders. Come on now.

                  Comment

                  Working...