Reed suspension reduced to a fine

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • flippy
    Legend
    • Dec 2008
    • 17088

    #16
    Ed Reed knows how hard James Harrison hits. I think James embarrassed him on the one punt return a few years back.
    sigpic

    Comment

    • Steel Life
      Pro Bowler
      • May 2008
      • 1535

      #17
      I'm sorry but this whole thing about Reed being "a good guy" or "not that kind of player" is BS & has nothing to do with his actions & that in each case he INTENDED to do what he did & that is what the league is trying to prohibit - intentional hits to the head. On both the Sanders & Branch hits he has time to decide to make a legitimate tackle but DECIDES to go high & that's what this should be based on. Sanders DOES NOT dramatically drop his head into Reed's hitting plane & to put the onus for either the Sanders or Branch's hit - which is indefensible - on the WRs is just searching for a rationalization to protect Reed. What is clear is that Reed, who is quickly becoming a shadow of his former self with shoulder & neck injuries, no longer goes for the secure tackle but instead tries to over compensate by attempting to blow WRs up & the best way to do that is go high.

      All that said, I never agreed with the loss of a game check but a substantial fine & a suspension were certainly warranted & it could be argued that the suspension would've been more effective in curtailing the kind of hits the NFL wants to see weeded out.
      It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust & sweat & blood...

      Comment

      • flippy
        Legend
        • Dec 2008
        • 17088

        #18
        Instead of fining or suspending a player, how about the guy who gives another guy a concussion is responsible for his future medical bills. If a bunch of guys concuss the same guy, then they split the future medical bills.
        sigpic

        Comment

        • BradshawsHairdresser
          Legend
          • Dec 2008
          • 7056

          #19
          How 'bout the league drops its arbitrary, capricious manner of penalizing players and instead invests some money into better helmets?

          Comment

          • Terrible Towlie
            Benchwarmer
            • Sep 2012
            • 53

            #20
            Originally posted by BradshawsHairdresser
            How 'bout the league drops its arbitrary, capricious manner of penalizing players and instead invests some money into better helmets?
            Exactly. The NFL says that it's #1 concern is the health and safety of the players, but they don't require the players to wear the newer helmets developed that protect the head better. If there is a helmet (and there is) that lessens the impact to the head during contact, it should be mandatory that those are the helmets used.
            Don't Forget to bring a Towel

            Comment

            Working...