How do you guys think our OL played?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SanAntonioSteelerFan
    Legend
    • May 2008
    • 8361

    How do you guys think our OL played?

    I always forget to focus on them during the game ... I don't remember too many false starts (Colon must have been under the weather or something), but Ben did have to scramble hard 2 or 3 times, seems like they did ok overall to me ... any one want to give them a grade?


    We got our "6-PACK" - time to work on a CASE!

    HERE WE GO STEELERS, HERE WE GO!
  • DBR96A
    Backup
    • Feb 2012
    • 469

    #2
    They did a better job in pass protection than they did in run blocking.
    sigpic
    Pittsburgh, PA: City of Champions.

    Comment

    • Starlifter
      Legend
      • May 2008
      • 5078

      #3
      they completed the game without injury and ben for the most part stayed clean. it appeared the jets were executing a lot of run blitzes, many which were successful. nevertheless we ran enough to keep them honest and gave ben enough time to find the open WR's. I'd grade today as a solid B.
      2014 MNF EXEC CHAMPION!!!

      Comment

      • Oviedo
        Legend
        • May 2008
        • 23824

        #4
        Run blocking is still work in progress. Ben made the pass blocking look better than it was. Overall it was a "C" game for the OL.
        "My team, may they always be right, but right or wrong...MY TEAM!"

        Comment

        • steelfin
          Backup
          • Jan 2009
          • 455

          #5
          Obviously they played well enough to win...but....

          The running game needs help.

          Short passes have allowed us to keep Ben healthy.

          Way too much contact behind the line of scrimmage.

          The OL needs to continue to improve and hopefully will as the season progresses.

          Comment

          • flippy
            Legend
            • Dec 2008
            • 17088

            #6
            On pace for 64 sacks. Helping out backs get 2 YPC. Getting everyone hit in the backfield.
            sigpic

            Comment

            • Oviedo
              Legend
              • May 2008
              • 23824

              #7
              Originally posted by flippy
              On pace for 64 sacks. Helping out backs get 2 YPC. Getting everyone hit in the backfield.
              Still way too much penetration of the interior of the OL. Everyone got beat yesterday. We know Foster isn't the answer, but is Pouncey more hype than performance? Is Colon still learning?

              For a new thought, is Kugler the problem? We all, me included, praised Kugler a couple of years ago but the OL is still marginal and we absorb an extremely high number of injuries. Thoughts?
              "My team, may they always be right, but right or wrong...MY TEAM!"

              Comment

              • BigRob
                Pro Bowler
                • Jul 2008
                • 1381

                #8
                I still think this OL has some real potential if they can stay healthy. Once we get Castro in the line-up and he gets his feet under him, I think we can be good.

                One thing I like about this year, it seems like we are going to be able to get and peak at the right time if everyone can get and stay healthy.
                Here comes the BOOM!
                sigpic

                Comment

                • RuthlessBurgher
                  Legend
                  • May 2008
                  • 33208

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Oviedo
                  Still way too much penetration of the interior of the OL. Everyone got beat yesterday. We know Foster isn't the answer, but is Pouncey more hype than performance? Is Colon still learning?

                  For a new thought, is Kugler the problem? We all, me included, praised Kugler a couple of years ago but the OL is still marginal and we absorb an extremely high number of injuries. Thoughts?
                  I think formations are giving away our intentions too much. Lining up 3 TE's next to each other on the end of the line then attempting to run behind them over and over (had to be a half dozen times at least) is moronically stupid. Leonard Pope and David Paulson scare no one. The speed of our wideouts scare everyone. Why keep our WR's on the bench in favor of multiple TE packages? I think the reason that Ben is so good on 3rd down is because that is the only time that he has Wallace, Brown, Sanders, Heath, and a single RB at his disposal. If we used that formation more on 1st and 2nd down as well, we could pass and run out of it as well. The oppositon is forced to play nickel against our 3-wide set, and the safeties have to play deep in order to respect our deep speed. That means that there are only 6 men in the box for our 5 OL and Heath to block if we want to run. That is much better than bringing in more crappy TE's on the line so that the defense has 9 men stacked in the box against us (shocking that we can't run for 3 yards a carry when we have a steady dose of this as our routine run formation).
                  Steeler teams featuring stat-driven, me-first, fantasy-football-darling diva types such as Antonio Brown & Le'Veon Bell won no championships.

                  Super Bowl winning Steeler teams were built around a dynamic, in-your-face defense plus blue-collar, hard-hitting, no-nonsense football players on offense such as Hines Ward & Jerome Bettis.

                  We don't want Juju & Conner to replace what we lost in Brown & Bell.

                  We are counting on Juju & Conner to return us to the glory we once had with Hines & The Bus.

                  Comment

                  • hawaiiansteel
                    Legend
                    • May 2008
                    • 35648

                    #10
                    Originally posted by RuthlessBurgher
                    I think formations are giving away our intentions too much. Lining up 3 TE's next to each other on the end of the line then attempting to run behind them over and over (had to be a half dozen times at least) is moronically stupid. Leonard Pope and David Paulson scare no one. The speed of our wideouts scare everyone. Why keep our WR's on the bench in favor of multiple TE packages? I think the reason that Ben is so good on 3rd down is because that is the only time that he has Wallace, Brown, Sanders, Heath, and a single RB at his disposal. If we used that formation more on 1st and 2nd down as well, we could pass and run out of it as well. The oppositon is forced to play nickel against our 3-wide set, and the safeties have to play deep in order to respect our deep speed. That means that there are only 6 men in the box for our 5 OL and Heath to block if we want to run. That is much better than bringing in more crappy TE's on the line so that the defense has 9 men stacked in the box against us (shocking that we can't run for 3 yards a carry when we have a steady dose of this as our routine run formation).

                    I completely agree, with Revis out I really expected us to run some 4 WR formations and instead we ran 3 TE ones?

                    Comment

                    • SanAntonioSteelerFan
                      Legend
                      • May 2008
                      • 8361

                      #11
                      ^ ^ Were we just running out the clock, or using the run to set up the pass?


                      We got our "6-PACK" - time to work on a CASE!

                      HERE WE GO STEELERS, HERE WE GO!

                      Comment

                      • Slapstick
                        Rookie
                        • May 2008
                        • 0

                        #12
                        Originally posted by RuthlessBurgher
                        I think formations are giving away our intentions too much. Lining up 3 TE's next to each other on the end of the line then attempting to run behind them over and over (had to be a half dozen times at least) is moronically stupid. Leonard Pope and David Paulson scare no one. The speed of our wideouts scare everyone. Why keep our WR's on the bench in favor of multiple TE packages? I think the reason that Ben is so good on 3rd down is because that is the only time that he has Wallace, Brown, Sanders, Heath, and a single RB at his disposal. If we used that formation more on 1st and 2nd down as well, we could pass and run out of it as well. The oppositon is forced to play nickel against our 3-wide set, and the safeties have to play deep in order to respect our deep speed. That means that there are only 6 men in the box for our 5 OL and Heath to block if we want to run. That is much better than bringing in more crappy TE's on the line so that the defense has 9 men stacked in the box against us (shocking that we can't run for 3 yards a carry when we have a steady dose of this as our routine run formation).
                        I can only figure that it was something that Haley saw on tape...Buffalo ran for 195 yards on the Jest last week...they shored up their run D by run blitzing quite a bit...

                        Last week, against the Yonkos, the Steelers were in 3 WR formations for most of the game...
                        Actually, my post was NOT about you...but, if the shoe fits, feel free to lace that &!+€# up and wear it.

                        Comment

                        • ikestops85
                          Hall of Famer
                          • Jun 2008
                          • 3724

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Oviedo
                          Still way too much penetration of the interior of the OL. Everyone got beat yesterday. We know Foster isn't the answer, but is Pouncey more hype than performance? Is Colon still learning?

                          For a new thought, is Kugler the problem? We all, me included, praised Kugler a couple of years ago but the OL is still marginal and we absorb an extremely high number of injuries. Thoughts?
                          I agree with everything you said. The penetration the Jets got on running plays was unbelieveable.

                          Pouncey did not look as good last year as he did as a rookie. This year so far he looks worse. I've seen him walked into the backfield on numerous plays. I thought Colon and Pouncey would give us some nice push on the left side for us to get some of those tough 1 and 2 yards pickups that we need occasionally. That hasn't been the case. Maybe Kugler isn't what we thought after that first year when it appeared he was turning the offensive line around.
                          As many on this site think ... The Rooney's suck, Colbert sucks, Tomlin sucks, the coaches suck, and the players suck.

                          but Go Steelers!!!

                          Comment

                          • chiken
                            Backup
                            • Jun 2010
                            • 489

                            #14
                            I am wondering if those Tight End sets will be more effective in the play action game when Saunders comes back..

                            Comment

                            • RuthlessBurgher
                              Legend
                              • May 2008
                              • 33208

                              #15
                              Originally posted by chiken
                              I am wondering if those Tight End sets will be more effective in the play action game when Saunders comes back..
                              I like Saunders more than Pope or Paulson, but there is still no excuse for having 3 TE and only 1 WR on the field. Based on best available talent, that ratio should be reversed.
                              Steeler teams featuring stat-driven, me-first, fantasy-football-darling diva types such as Antonio Brown & Le'Veon Bell won no championships.

                              Super Bowl winning Steeler teams were built around a dynamic, in-your-face defense plus blue-collar, hard-hitting, no-nonsense football players on offense such as Hines Ward & Jerome Bettis.

                              We don't want Juju & Conner to replace what we lost in Brown & Bell.

                              We are counting on Juju & Conner to return us to the glory we once had with Hines & The Bus.

                              Comment

                              Working...